Are Evangelical Roy Moore Supporters Hypocrites?

Was Moore convicted of something while I was napping?

No.

"Beloved believe not every spirit but try the spirits to see if they are of God."

I weighed the evidence before me and made my judgement.

Who isn’t ?

May the Lord rebuke whoever wrote this Article, and all in FR who agree with it. You are supporting the Demonrat Party by going along with the forgeries, the lies, and the false witnesses.

I am voting for Roy Moore on Dec 12th.

Is the hypocrite’s hypocrisy worse than the hypocrisy of the hypocrite he points the finger at?

You lie. You are aiding and abetting the Demonrats.

if the charges against Moore are true then what he did is terribly ugly and evil

I do not get this.

Even if every single thing said about him is true, what is it said he did that is "terribly ugly and evil"?

If ethics didn’t matter we’d be democrats.

Christianity does not consider a courtship between a 32-year-old man and a 16-year-old girl to be a sin, as long as civil laws are not violated. Rather than a sin, it is seen as a good thing—two mature adults discerning whether they have a vocation to marry each other and try to bring new souls into the world, who are predestined to love God for all eternity in Heaven.

There’s nothing virtuous in the behavior alleged by the three allegations of misconduct (the 14yo, the yearbook/car incident, the groping), nor in the implied allegation of lying. With that said, there are contradictions in the story of the 14yo, the yearbook looks on balance to have been forged, the character of the witnesses is in question, the witnesses are not available for further questioning, there is no common modus operandi in the alleged crimes, and other than the yearbook there is no corroborating evidence of any sort, physical or testimonial. With control of trillions of dollars at stake in the election, it is difficult to take these sorts of claims at face value.

Now there is no law that says that you have to vote for a man if you disapprove of his dating choices. For example, Christianity says that interracial dating is a good thing, but many voters have in the past disapproved of that sort of thing.

We have seen Moore’s character over the last several decades. We know what he stands for. We know what his opponents stand for. Its an easy choice.

The Anita Hill attack on Thomas was fraudulent. She worked for him for years and followed him from job to job. There was no evidence she had a problem until the ambush during his confirmation.

As for Moore and Trump, I would normally give the women the benefit of the doubt if they spoke up at some time other than days before an election after the ballots have been printed (in Moore’s case). And whatever Moore was 40 years ago, we know what he stands for now, and we know what his opponents stand for now.

Yup.

Elections are always about comparative choices. Always. It is not hypocritical to support Roy Moore compared to an abortion-loving democrat ... even if the charges turned out to be true. There are degrees of bad.

moses
To: Rush Limbaugh
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 12:06 PM
Subject: Moore 2

Never Trumpers and drive by media radio talk hosts are having a field day ignoring the fact that all of the accusers were of the age of legal consent. Including the one claiming when 14 years old. For her accusations are the juiciest. Which they gleefully relate and dwell on in a touchy feel-ly manner as if it came off of a police report yesterday. Not as a unsubstantiated recollection from 40 years ago. Because they know these are damaging accusations which will be almost impossible to disprove.

Despite that fact that it has been uncovered that two of his accusers are working for the Perversion Party and that their accusations are false and politically motivated. The drivebys and the nevers media are not reporting this but are mentioning one accuser is a “Republican” .

Here is background on two accusers. One works for the perverts that one knows the one who claimed she was 14. But was actually 17 at the time? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3603606/posts
Latest charge : Grad book signature a forgery; http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3604591/posts
someone named Roy signed it Moore’s last name was added to it. His legal secretary at the time he was a Circuit Court Judge declared it a forgery because her initials DA appear with his signature in that year book. Because she would do so to verify his signature only on his court rullings.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3605761/posts

I’ve always said we’d face the same things we used as wedge issues. That day has come and gone.

Ask that potential Dem senator if he gives a s*it if they are.

Start voting like you actually want to stop the left, and tell the church ladies to go sit on it if they dont like it.

No.

NOT AT ALL !

Read this:

IT’S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED The sevens in 1977 to the right of “Christmas,” are very different from the sevens in the date (12-22-77) above “Old Hickory House.” “Look at the two versions of the number “7,” tweeted Wictor. “”12-22-77” and “Olde Hickory House” were written by a different person,” he added. Next, [Thomas] Wictor points out “the “R” and “y” in “Roy,”” are not written the same way. The inflection of the “Y” is more pronounced in Moore’ signature as Chief Justice. The “R” is noticeably longer in the signature of Chief Justice, as well. “During his legal career, Judge Moore became the first full-time Deputy District Attorney in Etowah County, Alabama, and served in this position from 1977 until 1982. In 1984, Judge Moore undertook private practice of law in Gadsden, Alabama,” states Moore’s bio on his campaign website. “The accuser to this day calls him the District Attorney. He was NEVER District attorney. He was DEPUTY DA. DDA,” says Wictor. ... "

Check out this little fact from TheCipher

Interesting revelation about the signature in the yearbook and where it probably came from. Turns out Moore was the judge who ruled against Nelson in her divorce case and the signature is exactly how it was on his ruling - explains the D.A. ( which Nelson has ). Nelson also said she never had contact with him since the "incident"and failed to mention he was the judge in her divorce case.Roy Moore Attorney Demands Gloria Allred Release Original Yearbook, Contends it’s a ‘Fraud’ " ... "D.A." (District Attorney) initials after Moore’s signature, was recognized by Moore as the initials that his then-assistant, Deborah Adams , used to sign documents. ... "

From "TigerClaws" :

" ... But (exhibit 2) click on the image in the link.
You can clearly see two different color ink pens were used.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CNN/status/930205088299257859

Here's that image and a link to its ORIGINAL source :

And here’s one more source:

Live Stream: Moore Campaign Holding Press Conference

stamped his signature on papers and then put "D.A." on them

That's the THIRD Spelling of his assistant.

WHICH ONE IS CORRECT ?

Check out this little fact from TheCipher

Interesting revelation about the signature in the yearbook and where it probably came from. Turns out Moore was the judge who ruled against Nelson in her divorce case and the signature is exactly how it was on his ruling - explains the D.A. ( which Nelson has ). Nelson also said she never had contact with him since the "incident"and failed to mention he was the judge in her divorce case.Roy Moore Attorney Demands Gloria Allred Release Original Yearbook, Contends it’s a ‘Fraud’ " ... "D.A." (District Attorney) initials after Moore’s signature, was recognized by Moore as the initials that his then-assistant, Deborah Adams , used to sign documents. ... "

Here’s one more source:

Embattled GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore's attorney implies his signature in a girl's high school yearbook was a forgery

Delver Adams

And here’s a link to a DIFFERENT SPELLING of that name:

Roy Moore Campaign to Gloria Allred: Release the Evidence to Determine Whether There is Fraud " … “Judge Moore says he can’t remember ever signing his name with DA after it. But he had seen it before. You know where he had seen it ? When he was on the bench, his assistant whose initials are capital D. A. Delbra Adams would stamp his signature on a document and put capital D. A. That’s exactly how this signature appears on the divorce decree that Judge Moore signed dismissing the divorce action of Beverly Nelson.” … "

The more I search those different spellings of the assistant's name, the more I'm inclined to believe it was Delbra Adams.
I get results for a Court Specialist at State of Alabama Circuit Clerk's Office Cherokee County.
I also get results as a certified public notary located in Sand Rock, AL.
And ... I get results for Delbra Adams in Leesburg , AL. with a lot of A.K.A.s

Debra L Adams, Delbra M Adams, Debbie Adams, Debra Ly Adams, Delbra L Adams, Debble Adams, Debra Adams, Delbra Lynn Adams, Delbra L Admas

Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:

The Swamp Demands Conformity Nov 15, 2017 ... RUSH: Here’s Mark in Port Townsend — where’s Port Townsend ? Port Townsend what? CALLER: That’s a little bit west of Seattle. RUSH: In Washington. Okay. Great to have you with us. How you doing, sir ? CALLER: I’m doing great, sir. I hope you’re doing well yourself. RUSH: I am under siege today, Mark. I’m under siege. The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat. CALLER: That’s why you get paid the big bucks. I’m envious of you. RUSH: (laughing). CALLER: So the comment I wanted to make was that as a retired law enforcement officer, Jeff Sessions — I’m speaking as a retired law enforcement officer — Jeff Sessions says he doesn’t see any reason to doubt these girls’ word. Well, I see a really good reason. None of these girls have been put under oath and made a sworn statement under penalty of perjury. And Gloria Allred should be able to tell you that is the first thing you do when you get a client, you depose them and you get their statement on the record, and then you go from there. And if they’re not willing to make a sworn statement, that sounds really fishy to me. RUSH: I take it you don’t believe the women or you just don’t have enough information yet to make a determination ? CALLER: You don’t have enough information to make a determination, but speaking as an ex-cop, I find it fishy that nobody has made a sworn statement. And about that yearbook thing,you know, when I was in uniform at a certain time of year you’d get kids walking up to you all the time wanting you to sign their yearbook.“Hey, Officer Mark, sign my yearbook.” And I was only a cop. Can you imagine how politicians get kids wanting — doesn’t mean you remember all of them. RUSH: Hang on. On the yearbook stuff, folks, for those of you who may not be up to speed on this —and I doubt there are very many of you — there are allegations that some of these autographs in yearbooks are forged. There are conservative blog sites claiming to have evidence by virtue of side-by-side comparison that somebody other than Judge Moore signed some of these things. This is the first I’ve mentioned that. I’m just reacting to you bringing up the yearbooks. You’re upset with Jeff Sessions. He’s the attorney general, and he is going ahead and acknowledging thathe believes witnesses before anybody’s been put under oath, and you think that’s a little unprofessional, right ? CALLER: It sounds to me like he’s just trying to tread carefully. RUSH: Well, look, this is politics. It has its own court, and it’s not a court of law. CALLER: But these girls are making public statements — RUSH: They are women. They are women. CALLER: Okay, they’re making public statements impugning somebody’s honor. And somebody with responsibility needs to explain to them,if you’re gonna besmirch somebody, you gotta put it on the record. RUSH: No, you don’t. Only in court. And this is not in court. This is in politics. CALLER: I understand it’s politics, but Gloria Allred should know what the law is. RUSH: I’m sure she does. That’s why she’s not in court and is instead on TV. CALLER: I just want to make that point, Rush. Thank you. RUSH: I’m glad you called, Mark. Folks, I have to tell you,I’m having a little fun with this. No, don’t misunderstand here, but he’s exactly right, but of course that doesn’t —there’s a whole different inertia and movement now that is taking place in the world of politics, and there is no room for doubt. I mean,the guy did it, you don’t disbelieve the women. I mean, that’s something you must subscribe to now.The women don’t lie,except if you’re Juanita Broaddrick, then of course… that’s the point. BREAK TRANSCRIPT RUSH: I was having fun with the caller and his obvious consternationby confusing what happens in politics with what happens in the law,which is ironic, because the laws are written by these people. But what happens thereapparently the law doesn’t matter first and foremost. Find it funny. BREAK TRANSCRIPT RUSH: Steve in Rochester, Minnesota. Great to have you with us, sir. How are you ? CALLER: Hey, good. Thanks, Rush. Dittos. I’ve been listening since 1991. So I was reading through a Fox News story on the various senators,Republican senators and their comments about this whole situation, and I read read ’em one after another; there were many. And I was thinking as I got most of the way through it,this sounds a lot like your media montages, vis-a-vis gravitas, that I often hear on your show. The similarities were striking in what they said. And it was an observation that led me to think thatthis is really a coordinated attack. And I think that should be the focus, not the “he said, she said,” but the fact thatthis guy’s being attacked by the establishment, big time. RUSH: Let me put it to you another way in the form of a question. Interesting observation, by the way, that you,in reading and listening to all of the different people opposing Judge Moore, they’re all saying the same thing, is that your point ? Just like when Cheney was mentioned as the potential vice presidential nominee for George W. Bush, about 85 media people all said,“That’s gravitas. This is to provide gravitas.” They all had that word. You think the same thing’s happening here with the response to Judge Moore ? CALLER: Yes. Exactly. RUSH: Okay. So do you think —let me just ask you point-blank — do you think that, whether he did it or not, he’s being railroaded ? CALLER: Yes. RUSH: Interesting. CALLER: Yep. I think this is a coordinated attack, and what spurred me to think thiswas your comments yesterday about Mitch McConnell attacking Bannon’s choice. And I thoughthow else could you do this ? Here we are a month away from the election. RUSH: Let me tell you something. I don’t think there’s any doubt here. When Bannon went public and said thatJudge Moore was the first of many candidates they’re gonna support in order to oust the Republican leadership, I don’t think there’s any question here that McConnell’s reacting to that. Let me just ask you this.Have any of you ever, do you ever remember Mitch McConnell or the Republican leadership ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after — (interruption) You don’t remember. You don’t remember McConnell ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after …

Yep, this is why the culture war has been lost. Play to win, not “muh principles”...while the left laughs and goes about destroying everything they can.

Voting can be viewed as a choice between the lesser of two evils. Democrats support abortion (infanticide really) on demand.

The ad centers on an MSNBC interview Jones did on Sept. 27. Host Chuck Todd asked Jones what “limitations” he believes there should be when it comes to abortion.

“I am a firm believer that a woman should have the freedom to choose what happens to her own body,” Jones said. “And I’m going to stand up for that and I’m going to make sure that that continues to happen.”

More from the interview:

TODD: But you wouldn’t legislate ― so you wouldn’t be in favor of legislation that said ban abortion after 20 weeks or something like that?

JONES: No, I’m not in favor of anything that is going to infringe on a woman’s right and her freedom to choose. That’s just the position that I’ve had for many years. It is a position that I continue to have.

But when those people ― I want to make sure people understand that once a baby is born, I’m going to be there for that child. And that’s where I become a right-to-lifer. Jones has made no secret of his support for women’s reproductive rights. On Sept. 23, he posted a photo of himself at a Planned Parenthood event.