Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Convention of States Hopes to Rein in Federal Government
Blue Ridge Now ^ | September 27th 2017 | Derek Lacey

Posted on 09/29/2017 4:20:29 PM PDT by Jacquerie

In his remarks at the Henderson County public library, Mike Faulkenberry, state director of the N.C. Convention of States Project, asked a crowd of about 80 people whether they felt the federal government is “doing just a bang-up job.”

None raised their hand to answer yes.

He asked whether they felt the federal government gets carried away sometimes, but for the most part does pretty well in areas such as taxes and regulations, and again none answered yes.

But when he asked who felt the federal government “is completely out of control,” hands went up across the room.

The Convention of States Project is an effort to hold a convention of states to rein in the federal government, focusing specifically on term limits, fiscal restraint and reducing and restraining its power and jurisdiction. “We all agree that the federal government is just broken; it doesn’t work anymore,” he said. “It certainly doesn’t work anything like the way that the founders intended for it to work and that the framers of the Constitution dictated that it work.”

Faulkenberry led a discussion Tuesday night at the library about the Convention of States Project’s effort. He said the government can be fixed, but those in power will never fix it themselves.

The framers of the Constitution knew three things were necessary for good government, he said: that the people need to pay attention and vet who they elect in order to send good people to office, that those people implement good policy, and that a good structure is imperative for the other two.

That structure is the Constitution, he explained, but “that’s where we have dropped the ball a lot, is by allowing the structure, the Constitution, that the framers did such a wonderful job with, (to) be distorted, be changed, be modified, in some cases be ignored, and instead, we’ve got what we’ve got now.”

The fix, though, is also in the Constitution, he said — in Article V, a convention of the states. “It’s time we step up and do something about it,” Faulkenberry said.

Article V provides ways to amend the Constitution: that two-thirds of both houses of Congress can propose amendments when they deem it necessary, or that two-thirds of the legislatures of the states call for a convention.

Regardless of which of those two ways an amendment is proposed, the Article provides that the amendment must then be ratified by either three-fourths of the states’ legislatures or by conventions in three-fourths of the states, with Congress to decide which.

One chamber in 13 states saying no or saying nothing, Faulkenberry explained, would prevent the passage of the amendment. Of the country’s 99 state legislative bodies, it would take only 13 to stop it.

“That’s a really high bar — a really high bar — and it should be,” he said. “We shouldn’t amend the Constitution lightly.”

For North Carolina, Senate Joint Resolution 36, “A joint resolution applying to Congress for an Article V convention of the states with the purpose of proposing amendments to the United States Constitution,” has passed the Senate and is set to be considered by the House.

State Reps. Chuck McGrady and Cody Henson and State Sen. Chuck Edwards are all in favor of the measure, and both McGrady and Edwards were on hand Tuesday night to discuss their position.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: articlev; constitution; cos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Jacquerie

Keep the 17th but modify it that states that Senators must win a majority of counties to be the winner


21 posted on 09/30/2017 1:52:59 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (We're right, you're wrong - that's the end of the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Our best chance is that President Trump gets great judicial confirmations. Most of the damage that's been done has been from rogue judges.

The Convention is a really bad idea. Look at the NFL as an example.....the players and team ownership that used to be patriotic have been bullied into submission by the forces that seek to destroy the nation. And look at the incredible numbers of pols who campaign conservative then when in power implement the globalist agenda.

A convention to change the Constitution we're trying to preserve? Too much downside risk.

22 posted on 09/30/2017 2:25:04 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

No.


23 posted on 09/30/2017 2:28:18 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Doesn’t matter what the ‘laws’ are. There is always a way around them and liberals/deep-staters/statists will use them to defeat an nullify the intent. Worse, you won’t find out until its all over, and any punitive state laws that held sway before the start will be gone by the end.

Such events are only for ‘trusting souls,’ but not for the real world which has teeth and will use them to tear such souls apart before devouring them.


24 posted on 09/30/2017 3:29:08 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grania

An Article V convention does NOT change the Constitution. It proposes amendments for the States to vote on just like in the past Congress has done. It is a means for the States to act when Congress doesn’t. Historically what we have seen , the stupid amendments tend not to make it through the States, the exception being the 18th amendment.
Wouldn’t you like an amendment with wording specifically clarifying the “Commerce Clause” or one specifically stopping the “anchor baby” interpretation of the 14th & 15th amendments. I guess you still want to rely on the “wisdom” of lawyers and judges in those interpretations, but its “ ok” if its “conservative” lawyers and judges. Who can “grow” in office over time as the media puts it and move left! I prefer to remove the ambiguity in those interpretations. I see no other way to do it.


25 posted on 09/30/2017 8:18:51 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Cos I’m in. Go for it. Nothing to lose.


26 posted on 09/30/2017 8:21:57 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

A Cos that repelled the 16th and 17th amendments would be a huge success. It either CoS or Civil War I am good either way.


27 posted on 09/30/2017 8:23:11 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

This thread is full of older people with the attitude “don’t do anything radical or fix anything until I am dead and gone”.


28 posted on 09/30/2017 8:24:44 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grania

You’ve made your point. Now sit down.


29 posted on 09/30/2017 8:25:41 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: central_va

George Soros is involved in the Constitutional Convention big time.


30 posted on 09/30/2017 8:58:17 AM PDT by SaraJohnson ( Whites must sue for racism. It's pay day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

So what , there will be patriots involved too. I am not afraid of that old coot.


31 posted on 09/30/2017 9:07:17 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

From what I have heard/read there is a difference between a Constitutional Convention and an Art. V Convention of States.

Perhaps someone with more involvement in the COS can clarify this?


32 posted on 09/30/2017 9:10:36 AM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Freeper formerly known as bushwon ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2; SaraJohnson

Think question was answered in Post #5

It’s a gathering of state delegates that consider, then vote on, then propose amendment or amendments to the US Constitution. This amendment or amendments are then sent to the states for ratification. The states have to ratify just like in the past, it does not directly change the Constitution. It bypasses Congress drawing up and passing an amendment or amendments to be submitted to the states. See Article V US Constitution.

5 posted on 9/29/2017, 6:41:47 PM by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse]


33 posted on 09/30/2017 9:16:14 AM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Freeper formerly known as bushwon ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

Mark Levin gives a brief (30 min.) but detailed description here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKtWK79yzuY

If you prefer to read a more detailed and thorough study get his book, “The Liberty Amendments”.


34 posted on 09/30/2017 10:27:54 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2; houeto
<>From what I have heard/read there is a difference between a Constitutional Convention and an Art. V Convention of States. Perhaps someone with more involvement in the COS can clarify this?<>

I'm just a COS volunteer, but I wrote an extensive and well-received blog post on the topic.

Publius Huldah v. Article V Part III.

35 posted on 09/30/2017 2:29:47 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I have to wonder if Article V opponents oppose other clauses in the Constitution. Its early form appeared in Governor
Randolph’s proposed Virginia Plan of government at the opening of the federal convention in May 1787. What is more fundamental to republican government?


36 posted on 09/30/2017 2:38:10 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
Our masters wouldn't be our masters if they felt compelled to constantly look over their shoulders for political pitchforks.

Toward an Annual Article V State Amendments Convention.

37 posted on 09/30/2017 2:57:54 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Our masters wouldn't be our masters if they felt compelled to constantly look over their shoulders for political pitchforks.

I think they would be much more concerned about a serious, thought out campaign for a couple of specifc changes.

This COS movement, absent specific goals, is rightly viewed as a fantastic diversion. Everyone imagining that all their their wishes will come true at some magical convention.

Hardly a threat to those holding power in the real world.

38 posted on 09/30/2017 9:35:38 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

The convention is the place for specific changes.


39 posted on 10/01/2017 2:27:11 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
The convention is the place for specific changes.

Changes to what?

The only thing close to consensus as an amendment is balanced budget and that's only because everyone still has their own idea about how it will work.

It's an almost exact parallel to repealing the ACA. Everyone is for it until a specific scenario takes shape - with all it's warts. Then it all goes pear-shaped

The ACA repeal has been a genuine debacle but will seem like legislative genius compared to what would happen at a COS.

The COS is a tool to implement a solution, not a solution in itself. The first step is to agree on the solution.

40 posted on 10/01/2017 5:02:05 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson