Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whoopi Goldberg Says Media Coverage of Donald Trump Was '98% Positive'
Mediaite.com ^ | 6:22 pm, June 13th, 2017 | by Joe Bilello

Posted on 06/13/2017 4:04:37 PM PDT by drewh

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich appeared on The View Tuesday morning to discuss all things Donald Trump with the ladies. At one point, host Jedediah Bila asked Gingrich about Trump’s support among the public. “Are people frustrated with him, are they disappointed with him? What are they feeling out there?” she asked.

Gingrich expressed his surprise that the President has been able to garner any level of support from the public after the “endless barrage” of negative, even hostile press he has faced since he announced his bid for the White House.

Gingrich cited a recent Harvard study which found that 93% of the media coverage of the President was negative prompting host Whoopi Goldberg to make a bizarre, perhaps delusional claim about the relationship between Donald Trump and the media:

GINGRICH: I think it’s amazing, if you look at the — for example, CNN’s 93% negative coverage according to Harvard, 93% negative, I think it’s a miracle that Trump has any approval.

JOY BEHAR: Oh, my God.

GINGRICH: Constant unending barrage —

BEHAR: I have a question, too.

WHOOPI: So, do you mean, because I recall––and maybe I’m crazy––but I recall from the time the gentleman came down the escalator until the time he won, he was 24/7 on every television on every network forcing– making one of the head of the networks saying, ‘Yeah, it wasn’t good for America but it was great for us.’ It was all positive until people started asking questions. Now —

GINGRICH: It wasn’t all positive!

SUNNY HOSTIN: It was live coverage of Donald Trump was saying.

WHOOPI: I’m sorry, I —

GINGRICH: It was all noisy but it wasn’t all positive.

WHOOPI: No, no. 98% of it was positive, Newt.

There is no doubt that the media coverage of Donald Trump was not quite as hostile when his candidacy was considered by many to be nothing more than a publicity stunt. The coverage become increasingly more negative as Trump’s chances of victory became more apparent eventually devolving to all-negative-all-the-time coverage from most media outlets. But, even in the early days, 98% postive?

Watch above, via ABC.

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: xkaydet65

As a Trump supporter, you have no idea how wrong you are.

They slammed Trump 24/7/365 while he was running.

Good grief, former Conservative internet sites joined in.

They attempted to toss the debates to others by pinpointing him with personal attacks.

Remember the WSJ, the WP, the NYT, and almost every other paper. They were attacking him prior to the nomination.

Remember Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, and a host of other internet sites. Remember FoxNews, CNN, MSNBC, and CNBC?

Remember the NFL and it’s players? Remember ESPN?

It was full on attack Trump mode throughout.

Megan Kelly tossed out the first pitch including reference to Rosie O’Donnell. The media swooned for weeks about that, after Trump ripped her for doing it.

Free ride, supported Trump?

LOL


41 posted on 06/13/2017 4:59:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

To prove it, ask Goldberg this... “You say that you know what 98% is. Then answer this: 724,122 people, or 98% of some number of people who were sampled, think Obama was a foreign born fraud who wasn’t even constitutionally qualified to be our president. How many people were sampled? You can use your calculator.”

Who thinks she could answer? If she knows what 98% is, she could guess the answer and get pretty close. But if I’m right, and she doesn’t know what 98% means, she couldn’t get close guessing, and she couldn’t calculate it with her calculator either. In other words, when she says 98% of the news stories about Trump were favorable, she has no idea what she’s talking about. Hence, the absurdity of the claim.


42 posted on 06/13/2017 5:00:40 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

I really don’t see a problem here...

Everyone knows Ms Goldberg’s resume...

She has long been an expert senior political analyst ever since she graduated summa cum laude from Yale with a BS in Political Science, then Wharton School of Business with a Masters in Business Management, Then her Law Degree from Harvard...

She has worked directly with ALL presidents since Eisenhower, you know....

Ohhhhhhhh.....wait......


43 posted on 06/13/2017 5:05:20 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I don’t know why this demented woman receives media coverage.

Her opinions are never rooted in reality or truth.


44 posted on 06/13/2017 5:09:44 PM PDT by onyx (Donate Monthly ~ Join 300 Club!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Maybe 98% positively negative.


45 posted on 06/13/2017 5:11:50 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; drewh

On one of Whoopi’s 8 abortions the doctor must have put the tube in her cranium.


46 posted on 06/13/2017 5:19:07 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (Show me a peaceful Muslim and I will show you a heretic to the Koran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drewh
The MSM coverage was positive if you take into account that many of us invert their message. That is, if they say something is 'up', I'll take it as meaning that it is really 'down'.
Our MSM intrepid reporters are the personification of the Isaiah 5:20 people
(Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!).
I admit though, once in a blue moon the MSM will tell the truth - but I think they just do that to mess with my mind. But this is very rare.

So from my standpoint, the MSM coverage of Trump was very positive. They hate his guts and I hate their guts.

47 posted on 06/13/2017 5:21:30 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

It WAS 98% positive for her - she loved it.


48 posted on 06/13/2017 5:23:09 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

To the goldberg any anything less than calling for Trump’s assassination because he was a treasonous wifebeating paedophile was “positive” because trump is obviously far worse than a treasonous wife beating paedophile.


49 posted on 06/13/2017 5:26:31 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Everyone knows Ms Goldberg’s resume...
*************
Lets rehash it here ...

real name Caryn Elaine Johnson ....
moved to LA as a young teen
joined a street gang that sold drugs
she was the “crew slut” for the gang with the responsibility of providing sex to any gang member that demanded it..
she was of course a drug addict
her name “whoopi” came from her inability to control her bowels after many years of providing anal sex to well hung gang members
She chose the name goldberg because she thought it was funny to be black and jewish
She was a comedian for many years and her signature act was pretending to be a young white girl with golden hair
She testified before congress back in the 1990’s when the rats were accusing repubs of hating women because of the “Mexico City” restrictions on abortion funding, in that testimony she admitted to having 7 or 8 abortions (couldn’t remember) ,, and that Medi-Cal paid all but $2 each time...
“Without abortion she never would have made it as a comedian....”
Although she was a HS dropout she has pretended to have a PhD in Lit. ,, seems like she attended/graduated from an acting school after making some money on the comedy club circuit.


50 posted on 06/13/2017 5:34:36 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (Show me a peaceful Muslim and I will show you a heretic to the Koran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

Oh....THAT Ms Goldberg.....

I see.....LOL


51 posted on 06/13/2017 5:39:27 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Maybe?


52 posted on 06/13/2017 5:47:28 PM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy is not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Pres. Trump got more face time on the cable channels than all other 16 GOP candidates combined. That is media. Erick Erickson, Beck, Levin have auudience but thet are not news media. Pres. Trump was on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, he was almost a regular on Fox and friends. Nor was he bludgeoned on these appearances. The hope was to elevate him to the nomination and get him slaughtered in the General. So once he got the nod the media turned on a dime and gave a nickel change. Now if the former Mrs. Ted Danson is talking about the General and the Presidency, she is in need of treatment for delusions.


53 posted on 06/13/2017 5:50:40 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

What you are forgetting is that every time he was on, they literally trashed him. Good grief.

The media coverage of Trump was negative from the word go.

The only people who spin the way your are, are the Ted Cruz supporters who made this claim all along, and completely ignored the fact that when he was on, it was one scandal after another that was focused on.

It was almost all negative coverage.

Oh you were mean to Rosie. How can you justify that?

Oh were were mean to Megan Kelly. How can you justify that?

Oh you sexually harassed women. What do you have to say about that?

Oh you incited violence. What do you have to say about that?

Oh that video about grabbing crotches, what do you have to say about that?

You don’t remember any of this?


54 posted on 06/13/2017 5:56:38 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Hahahahaha...that’s great! I’m stealing that...


55 posted on 06/13/2017 5:59:40 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals are in a state of constant cognitive dissonance, which explains their mental instability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Since her brains are in her crotch this seven abortions so she braged about must have made her the moron she is.


56 posted on 06/13/2017 6:00:29 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vehmgericht
"...Whoopi should go back to making her cushions..."

Or breathing into them to make them smell more life-like...

57 posted on 06/13/2017 6:00:37 PM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals are in a state of constant cognitive dissonance, which explains their mental instability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All

Whoopi is right, ....

....from her point of view.

She considers anything but a demand for immediate assassination of Trump to be positive...

And only about 2% of them called for him to be immediately assassinated.


58 posted on 06/13/2017 6:19:41 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Wow, I posted mine above before reading your earlier one.

GMTA,


59 posted on 06/13/2017 6:25:17 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: drewh
No, no. 98% of it was positive

In my youth I smoked some serious weed, I "aint never" smoked what she is smoking. "hell." one ounce of her stuff would probably get me to my grave! That be serious weed!

60 posted on 06/13/2017 7:54:51 PM PDT by cpdiii ( Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. CONSTITUTUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson