Posted on 04/20/2017 7:38:44 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
During todays Morning Joe discussion of the ouster of Bill OReilly at Fox News, Joe Scarborough asked, Do they remake over the entire network? Is anybody else in the [Murdoch] familys crosshairs right now?
Replied New York Times reporter Jeremy Peters: I think you have to look at somebody like Sean Hannity, and question whether or not his almost propaganda-like attitude and programming every night is going to be acceptable in the minds of the family, which is clearly trying to shift the network in a different direction.
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Same.
The key to that whole article is the first two words out of the mouth of that leftist, I think. If he were honest he would have said I wish. This is all speculation by a leftist, its not going to happen. If Hannity goes its because his show is not drawing ratings.
Absurd projection from the number 1 purveyor of Fake News.
A NYT reporter calling Hannity a propagandist is the pot calling the kettle black.
Garbage and wishful thinking.
This is why you don’t feed the alligators. Yesterday it was Roger Ailes, today it’s Bill O’Reilly, and eventually they’ll come after Sean, Eric Bolling and on and on.
Socialism is a magnet because it protects the lazy, the inept and the dysfunctional from having to sufferer the consequences of their own incompetence. It does that by forcing the ept and productive to carry their parasitical asses. Of course human parasites love Socialism.
Why doesn’t Breitbart merge with OANN and create a global news network. They don’t have to be on cable they can live stream.
They (the leaders) don’t care if it “works” per se.
What they want is the destruction of the West, free markets, and yes, freedom in general.
It’s a magnet for the masses, because of the (false) prospect of prosperity and comfort, without effort and work.
The result is always, misery for all, except the privileged few that are in command.
You have to understand, this is but a wet dream on the part of a NYT columnist. Sean Hannity can be a little wearing to listen to at times, but mostly, his heart is in the right place.
When the Left spouts its one-sided and biased opinions, that is not “propaganda”, that is just “continuing education”. Just so the sheeple do not stray, doncha know.
If only he wouldn’t constantly interrupt.
Why not say if the sun rises tomorrow it will prove O’Reilly was fired for fake claims.
Your logic is false, there would be no connection between such events unless you can prove one.
I grew up saying that one as my dad used it all the time. I certainly knew the context of its proper use and thought it was a word, not an acronym. I think it was a cornerstone of WWII.
Again, got a late life education on that one too! I have a few more that I repeated in total innocence. Those were the days.
The minds of the Manson family.
It seems very obvious that since the Murdochs took over Fox that the network is being run by lib Amateurs. The once great news organization will now sink into the Same gutter slime as the rest if the MSM.
R.I.P. Fox...it was great while it lasted.
It would possibly show that the ouster of O'Reilly and Hannity (if this article is true) is based on the ideological shift of the network/Murdochs. Even you should be able to follow that.
I have cable for FOX and TCM. Now it is just for TCM. When TCM goes leftist political, now that Robert Osborne is gone, I will have no more reason to get cable.
Because those folks are the doubleplusgood kind of propagandists.
So a year of bogus MSM polls using unattainable turnout models just to boost Hillary Clinton's perceived electoral lead was NOT propaganda?
-PJ
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/jan/06/facebook-posts/facebook-group-no-2-owner-fox-news-prince-alwaleed/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.