Posted on 12/12/2016 7:35:37 AM PST by pgkdan
A federal judge on Monday issued a stinging rejection of a Green Party-backed request to recount paper ballots in Pennsylvania's presidential election, won by Republican Donald Trump, and scan some counties' election systems for signs of hacking.
In his 31-page decision, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond said there were at least six grounds that required him to reject the Green Party's lawsuit, which had been opposed by Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general's office.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
Ignore that “oops”, carried over from copy/paste...
The ICC would gladly take up her case. It's up their alley. Go for it Jill!
It would be very interesting to see this happen. I’ve always thought it was voter fraud that got Obama elected, especially the second term.
If this was found to be accurate, does that strike the last eight years from the record? Does he get impeached, after the fact?
According to http://elections.wi.gov/elections-voting/recount/2016-presidential, still need the absentee ballots counted in Milwaukee, Wards 3 & 9 of City of Glendale are not yet recounted. There are a few other wards around the state that have not been recounted yet.
Judge Diamond correctly & precisely explained the legal grounds for rejecting Stein’s absurd statewide recount petition. There are still pockets of sanity remaining in American jurisprudence.
I fully expected this, & am very glad to read his decision.
Stein’s we–wuz–robbed street theatrics will dissolve into irrelevance. Her abuses of the courts in filing obviously frivolous suits will motivate state legislatures to pass stricter voting-recount laws; already happening. Her mad behavior further fragments the Red Greenies.
More winning for us!
Yep...buh bye beotch!
But.. but. the dems told Trump that not accepting the election results was an attack on the very foundation of our constitution and principles of democracy! :/
SCOTUS won’t disturb GOP voter fraud decree
By Tal Kopan and Josh Gerstein
01/14/13 03:03 PM EST
The Supreme Court on Monday declined the Republican National Committee’s request to lift a three-decade-old court order that limits the national GOP’s ability to challenge voters’ eligibility at the polls.
Thanks!
Well, a billion dollars just doesn't buy what it used to, you know...
“Has Milwaukee reported yet? “
They are still busing people in from Chicago to fill out ballots.
There was a Liberal WI judge who did the same thing in rejecting the state wide hand count demand by Stein. She stated that “I must follow the law regardless of my personal opinions”.
Couldn't she be defeated...ever? Now we see another tower of Clinton corruption crash to the ground. Amazing.
It is amazing...a day I was starting to believe would never come. No matter how glaring the corruption, no matter how obvious they always got a pass. This time it seems that we're finally finished with these odious creatures. A fact that I've prayed for for years!
Do you have a link to that? I need it for a FB discussion.
Two Russians walked into a polling place. They took floppies disguised as a ham and cheese sandwich and placed it facing the machine.
Suddenly, the lights dimmed and everyone looked at each other...except Jill. She was eating the sandwich and choking.
Disk, disk said the Russians.
Absolutely...
It's about the possibility that the Democrat Fraud Machine didn't work. Now, they are using the smokescreen of 'hacking' to find out why it didn't work.
Consider.
Hillary! has almost 2 million votes in her favor over Trump.
Had the fraud the Dems normally use to 'win' had occurred correctly, Hillary would have had 320+ EC votes AND a 2 million vote 'mandate'.
She only needed a few states for this to happen. Any of these states in combination, PA, MI, WI, FL, OH would have created this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.