Posted on 11/23/2016 4:10:33 AM PST by drewh
Megyn Kelly got a little personal about her politics in an interview with Fox colleague Alan Colmes tonight, given how many have publicly speculated about what she believes in.
Kelly said, I am not an ideologue. I always laugh because when I was coming up the ranks at Fox News, the left thought I was always in the tank for the Republicans because they always see you through a certain prism.
And because of, well, everything that happened in the past year, there are a lot of people assuming Kelly is in the tank for, you know, the Never Trumpers or for the liberals.
But Kelly made it clear that shes not in the tank for anyone:
I have no political ideology. Im a soulless lawyer at heart. I can see both sides of any argument. Im willing to be persuaded, but we have to stay open-minded.
Listen above, via Fox News Radio.
[image via screengrab]
Follow Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac
S/b. MEGYN above
So she should tell us for whom she voted.
Bingo!!!
Same for BOR.
I've always said if it paid as well to be a left wing cable news personality, BOR would be first in line...
She doesn’t even get that she’s embarrassing herself the way she’s shamelessly promoting her godforsaken book. A normal person would have a touch of humility in her demeanor, but there’s none there. “Me. Me. Me.”
Ainsley Earhardt on Fox also is promoting a book, but she’s tolerable.
WHO IS ASKING HER ANTHING????? SHE IS C O M P L E T E L Y IRRELEVANT!!!
“soulless”
At least she was honest about that.........
Well, she got the ‘soulless’ part right....
>>She doesnt even get that shes embarrassing herself the way shes shamelessly promoting her godforsaken book. A normal person would have a touch of humility in her demeanor, but theres none there. Me. Me. Me.
I agree. Two years ago, the title of her book “ Settle for More” would have shown her to be strong. Now, it’s just a pitiful display of her narcissism. Funny how her decision that she’s smarter than all her viewers combined affects our perception of her.
Yeh right
The difference between Ainsley’s book and Kelly’s book is that Ainsley’s book isn’t all about Ainsley.
She is a feminist, that is obvious.
So, she’s one of those people who believes in nothing, but will fall for anything?
If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.
She just wants to be loved by Hollywood and the leftist party planners. She will go where the celebrities go. She is weak.
Her interview with Howard Stern tells us her story.
She must have loved it that Ailes could be provoked by her body...despite what she has said.
She told Newt he needs anger management therapy.
A promising future in porn awaits her.
She’s halfway cute until she opens her mouth and then it all goes to h@ll in a hurry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.