Posted on 11/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PST by knak
Fwd: Sanders criticism
From:re47@hillaryclinton.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-05-26 12:04 Subject: Fwd: Sanders criticism
This isn't in keeping w the agreement. Since we clearly have some leverage, would be good to flag this for him. I could send a signal via Welch--or did you establish a direct line w him?
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Christina Reynolds *Date:* May 26, 2015 at 9:22:07 AM EDT *To:* Robby Mook , Kristina Schake < kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, Jennifer Palmieri < jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>, Tony Carrk , John Podesta , Oren Shur , Brian Fallon *Subject:* *FW: Sanders criticism*
Following up on our call on Friday, just wanted to give some updates and flag that Bernie went after HRC and WJC on wealth (including using the word “hustle.)
I followed up with Brad. The only thing they’ve pushed is from the attached docs—trying to get reporters to write that HRC and Bernie are actually in the same place. They are happy for any suggestions, but were not planning on making any big attacks around the announcement.
We’re working on talking points for surrogates now and will get those around. Unless others disagree, I don’t think we comment on the question below.
*From:* hrcrr@hillaryclinton.com [mailto:hrcrr@hillaryclinton.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Schwerin *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:58 AM *To:* HRCRR *Subject:* Fwd: Sanders criticism
Are we just declining comment on all these?
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Colin Campbell *Date:* May 26, 2015 at 8:54:10 AM EDT *To:* Josh Schwerin *Subject:* *Sanders criticism*
Morning Josh! Fresh off of a pantsuit post (and maybe something on the latest Snoop Dogg-for-Hillary news), I'm looking at putting together something Bernie Sanders said in a CBNC interview published this morning:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102694355
Asked about the Clintons' wealth, Sanders responded: "Theoretically you can be a multibillionaire and in fact be very concerned about the issues of working people. Theoretically that's true. When you hustle money like that, you don't sit in restaurants like this. You sit in restaurants where you spend, I don't know what they spend, hundreds of dollars for dinner and so forth. That's the world you are accustomed to. And that's the worldview that you adopt. I'm not going to condemn Hillary and Bill Clinton because they've made a lot of money. That type of wealth has the potential to isolate you from the reality of the world."
I wanted to see if the campaign had any comment, especially because her town hall events involve interacting with a lot of real-world people. Otherwise, I'll just pull a campaign quote from other times the money issue has popped up.
Probably looking at publishing something later this a.m. Thanks!
CC
--
530-559-4081
@BKcolin
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HRCRR" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hrcrr+unsubscribe@hillaryclinton.com. To post to this group, send email to hrcrr@hillaryclinton.com.
BigEdLB wrote:
“Bernie supporters in California who would have voted Beast can write in Bernie, and the vote would count.”
Hmm, I wonder what % of Dems in CA are Bernie supporters?
That just put a lot of Berniebots on the Trump train.
TRUMP LANDSLIDE COMING...
Are people rally dumb enough to think they’re going to find literal “We killed Vince Foster” evidence in a freaking e-mail?
Honestly I am sick and tired of pinning hopes on stuff that anonymous internet kids put out there for viewing, the whole system is just perfect for a disinfo campaign. There’s tons of legit stuff from Wikileaks, but it is all awash in all this other nonsense that it just makes people write off the whole thing.
just because you think your age right now does not give you a excuse in committing yourself to living the life you deserve
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooPBXfnIpYI
A lot of “conservative” candidates who run against RINO’s are planted phonies based on my experience over the years.
WikiLeaks is showing us how rigged the system is inside the Uniparty of D’s as well.
It’s Bernie Sellout’s fault. He believed her.
Pray America wakes
Whatchu talkin bout, Willis? Link please!
It’s not funny. A lot of Bernie supporters were desperate to avoid the corruption. They had no job, sometimes big student loans, and they were ignorant about socialism. They donated money they NEEDED because they believed we needed a change from Obamanomics. Sad that their money was being funneled to the bitch. It’s not their fault they were devoid of knowledge of civics or economics. Our leadership wants them that way and has designed the education system accordingly.
No, it’s hilarious. Socialists are trying to avoid corruption? You might want to peddle that somewhere else. You are talking about a man that was a planted shill for the Clinton campaign. A socialist who changed his party affiliation to run as a foil to Hillary in a faux primary to make it look like she wasn’t the “chosen one” because it’s her turn. Any time socialists gets played for the fools they are it brings me great joy.
P.S. No one twisted these kids arms to take on debt for a degree useless or otherwise. There are many ways to get an education and there is workout there for people with desire and drive. Enough with the excuse making.
Re: [Analytical & Intelligence Comments] Polish plane crash
Whatever. I feel for those who were fooled still.
Bernie Blackmailed - Podesta Emails...
Can anyone explain that disconnect?
Talk about lousy English!
The last phrase is ridiculously ambiguous.
Of course the vote could either count or not count.
If it does count, it could accrue to either candidate.
What the hell has happened to the English as the first language Americans?
A slate of electors was filed with the secretary of state, hence the vote will count. A vote for Mickey mouse or you don’t count as no slate of electors was filed on your behf, or on behalf of Disney’s rodent.
Researchers are dissecting the ‘Bernie Blackmail’ emails I pinged you to yesterday.
Here is the linking Drudge used yesterday:
WIKI: BERNIE BLACKMAIL...
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794756750926876672
MOOK CLAIMED ‘LEVERAGE’...
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794756750926876672
Actual wording, direct links.
The key word is ‘leverage’. Also mentioned ‘an agreement’ they apparently had with Bernie.
Someone from hillary.com emailed John Podesta directly.
Drudge now has it up in BIG BOLD letters.
Who is ...
re47
?
Right.
“Since we clearly have some leverage, would be good to flag this for him. I could send a signal via Welch—or did you establish a direct line w him?”
A person with legal leverage can be direct. But a blackmailing politician needs to send out proxies and have ‘plausible deniability’.
“Well, that’s at least three of us.................Only I’m 71 and thought I understood English fairly well.”
Make that four.
Who is ...
re47
?
Perhaps
RE: 47(th President... i.e., Obama)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.