Posted on 10/25/2016 4:27:59 AM PDT by Helicondelta
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
There is no more time to improve the process. It's now or never.
I don't see any purpose in rigging a machine to visually to visually tip you off that that is in fact happening.
I am not a programmer but it seems to me the theft would be in the code and you'd be none the wiser. It would seem like the code would just say something like . But again, I struggle with javascript so WTF do I know?
This explains it better. No paper trail in Texas. And watch the video to see the state director of elections run away from the issue. The democrats have rigged Texas.
http://www.infowars.com/report-votes-switched-from-trump-to-hillary-in-texas/
The machines that visually tip off the voter are the ones that are misprogrammed. The rest of them likely do it after the vote is cast.
Evoting means NO WAY to ever audit a vote trail.
No black pill involved.
But this only confirms the input is marked correctly.
The software reading the ballot, and then incrementing values, can do anything the programmer devised it to do.
The software can perform incorrect math, or it can simply add 10 votes to column A and subtract 20 votes from column B. Or it might ignore all the votes and simply report a predetermined total.
Furthermore, one of the polling staff might, independently of any voter, simply walk over to a machine and vote 50 times for candidate X, or feed in 90 ballots for candidate Y.
Solution:
Voters should get a unique ID number and a physical item carrying that ID number. Every vote/ballot should receive yet another unique vote number. Every voting record should come coupled with the voter's unique ID number, the unique transaction number of the vote, and a record of each item on the ballot. And date, time, location....
Leaving the polling station, the voter should receive two versions of his vote, one in clear text and one encoded. Each would hold all three pieces of info: voter number, vote number, and ballot choices. The voter might choose to destroy the clear text receipt there at the polling station.
With this, an individual voter would be able to, ten years after the vote, go online, enter his voter number and ballot/vote number, and compare his paper receipt with what the system claims was his vote.
None of this would stop fraudulent algorithms or poll-worker multi-voting or manipulation.
A partial solution would be to print physical copies of two receipts per vote. One goes home with the voter. One stays with the county election board. The board copies would be and should be used for recounts. These should be done as a matter of course. AND these should be checked for non-unique voter ID numbers.
We could do all this.
The only way to prove the machines wrong is to do an actual, manual ballot count. This is expensive and will never be ordered unless it is very close. Certainly the County and City clerks will be trying to avoid a manual count.
Bkmk
Or a show a trend like it has been by video.
death
Vote fraud is a crime against the Republic and should be a capital crime
there is no greater crime
NEEDS to be repeated OVER AND OVER!
pinging
You are on point. She seemed so smug and confident about the whole thing even in the Bermne Sanders stages.
As I have said, nothing save for divine intervention can win this election for Trump.
Thanks but I cannot view videos. dial-up.
What’s in the video?
Shows how the diebold machines that count paper ballots are probably being rigged as well.
For those machines counting paper ballots, before using at polling places, they need to run a certain number of dummy ballots with the results known through the machines, compare the results, then lock the machines if they are accurate. That could and should be done at each polling place where the number of machines is relatively small. Machines that fail are taken out of service. It shouldn't be difficult if you have adequate and honest poll watchers.
Thanks.
in 336 hours, I vote.
Trump’s added burden is to have a vote margin of victory greater than the dems’ extra margin of vote fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.