To: CedarDave; DarthVader
The only way to prove the machines wrong is to do an actual, manual ballot count. This is expensive and will never be ordered unless it is very close. Certainly the County and City clerks will be trying to avoid a manual count.
146 posted on
10/25/2016 10:02:01 AM PDT by
afraidfortherepublic
( “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.”)
To: afraidfortherepublic
148 posted on
10/25/2016 10:03:36 AM PDT by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Or a show a trend like it has been by video.
150 posted on
10/25/2016 10:08:22 AM PDT by
DarthVader
(Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
To: afraidfortherepublic
The only way to prove the machines wrong is to do an actual, manual ballot count. This is expensive and will never be ordered unless it is very close. Certainly the County and City clerks will be trying to avoid a manual count.For those machines counting paper ballots, before using at polling places, they need to run a certain number of dummy ballots with the results known through the machines, compare the results, then lock the machines if they are accurate. That could and should be done at each polling place where the number of machines is relatively small. Machines that fail are taken out of service. It shouldn't be difficult if you have adequate and honest poll watchers.
158 posted on
10/25/2016 11:01:31 AM PDT by
CedarDave
(Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
