Posted on 10/12/2016 4:36:31 PM PDT by Red Badger
Today Wikileaks released what is, by far, the most devastating leak of the entire campaign. This makes Trumps dirty talk video looks like an episode of Barney and Friends.
Even though when Trump called Hillary the founder of ISIS he was telling the truth and 100% accurate, the media has never stopped ripping him apart over it.
Today the media is forced to eat their hats because the newest batch of leaked emails show Hillary, in her own words, admitting to doing just that, funding and running ISIS.
John Podesta, Hillarys campaign chair, who was also a counselor to President Obama at the time, was the recipient of the 2014 email which was released today.
Assange promised his latest batch of leaks would lead to the indictment of Hillary, and it looks like he was not kidding. The email proves Hillary knew and was complicit in the funding and arming of ISIS by our allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar!
The media is yet to report on this, even though Wikileaks has a 10 year history of being 100% accurate in their leaks, never once releasing info that proved to be false.
Can you guess why?
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that The Saudis brag about funding 20% of Hillarys Presidential campaign, and along with Qatar, are among the largest donors to the CLINTON FOUNDATION.
Is it any mystery now why ISIS has flourished under the Obama/Clinton administration? The United States has created armed and funded the terrorists overthrowing Syria via our Terrorist State allies. When you know this it makes you look at the situation in Syria differently. Perhaps Russia and Iran are the ones fighting ISIS, it stands to reason once you know we are fighting Russia, and at the same time arming ISIS.
Clintons campaign and her Clinton Foundation are literally funded by the SAME PEOPLE who are funding ISIS and killing hundreds of thousands of innocents in the Middle East, and now, even here at home.
This is nothing short of TREASON. Hillary must be sent to trial and held accountable for crimes against humanity and Treason against the United States of America.
We know the media will do all in their power to bury this story so it is up to us to use social media to make sure every voter in America knows this before they cast their vote for president on Nov 8th. You know what to do
There's no law against taking money from the Saudis. There are laws against influence peddling, etc. The email doesn't implicate her in influence peddling.
Now you know why the Sauds bombed a funeral. Forcing war between the US and Yemen. We are now at open war with Yemen and will be with Iran in literally hours if not days. You can thank all those Saudi whores.
The facts in total implicate her. The email here provides a crucial fact.
You are arguing that one piece of evidence must by itself incriminate. That is so false, lawyers would not even address it because it is childish to argue about such.
Once again, what is the law that was broken? Did she take Saudi money and influence policy to benefit the Saudis? Probably. But it's not in the email. You say:
She talks about `pressure' not to stop ISIS but to contain the rivalry between the Saudis and the Qataris.
In the email she says
we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region
That doesn't match up with your claim. If I am quoting the wrong part of the email, then quote the correct part below.
Would not surprise me if Obozo starts a war between now and November 8th to seal the deal for H!.
Here's a counterexample to yours. My tagline for the past while is a direct quote from a Hillary email. The snippet is incriminating in the context of the situation. Some facts: they were trying to send classified talking points via secure fax. Another fact is that she needed the information soon. So she apparently directed someone to scan the paper into the computer and send it to her electronically via the nonsecure email server that she used. There is no other reasonable interpretation of the evidence.
Yep, wag the dog. They are all corrupt to the core.
Even though when Trump called Hillary the founder of ISIS he was telling the truth and 100% accurate, the media has never stopped ripping him apart over it.
Today the media is forced to eat their hats because the newest batch of leaked emails show Hillary, in her own words, admitting to doing just that, funding and running ISIS.
I believe that Obama, Hillary, and McCain made a big mistake by arming and funding the Muslim Brotherhood/al Qaeda in Syria. I believe this fund almost certainly helped ISIS spring forth upon the scene. I don't however think that was their plan. They were just inept, stupid, and even childish in their attempt to regional affairs.
Hillary didn't run ISIS. She didn't make day to day decisions what ISIS would do, or what it's hierarchy would be like.
This article talks about Saudi Arabia and Qatar financing ISIS. Perhaps they do. They also seem to donate to Hillary's foundation. That doesn't mean that Hillary is coordinating with them on ISIS.
The comments I listed above are not factual. I believe they verge on misinformation. They are certainly misguided if there was no il intent.
I despise Clinton as much as anyone, believe me. I still don't want our cause to be harmed by buying off on too much over the top stuff.
It's plenty damning enough that she was involved in advocating for and arming known terrorist groups. It is bad enough to realize that probably spilled over or was redirected to the ISIS start-up. Massive ignorance involved there...
I just want us to stick with what we know, and not attribute too much to her. Running ISIS? That may not be extremely far fetched for this demonic woman, but it isn't proven by anything we have seen.
I also meant to mention that when Hillary did address the funding to ISIS from Saudi Arabia and Qater, in the segment of notes posted on this thread, she talks about bringing pressure to bear to get them to stop it.
That is very damning to the claims the writer was making.
Thanks for the link!
Your argument is short and blinded. You’d make a typical hack addition to team Clinton.
She has committed treason by acting as an agent for an enemy’s bankers and acting to bring that enemy into the US where the enemy has killed and will continue to kill American innocents.
It could not be more clear.
Yes I saw the pic in post #4 on this thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3479854/posts?page=4#4
I think there may be irony connected with the photo of the two of them together.
McCain needed him dead just as Hillary and Obama did.
Reminds me of the picture of B Clinton being buddy-buddy with Ron Brown.
I think there may be irony connected with the photo of the two of them together.
McCain needed him dead just as Hillary and Obama did.
Reminds me of the picture of B Clinton being buddy-buddy with Ron Brown.
so stop with the the pub bashing....
its the rats that control the media, the purse strings, the fbi and cia's etc, as well as all of academia/Hollywood etc....
the pubs are just sniffing up the remnants....
lets concentrate on bashing the real crooks and traitors...the rats...
ELECT TRUMP...give him a congress and a senate with at least a chance of righting this ship....
OH and you are WHO??? The POST POLICE or something???
I very well KNOW what needs to be posted and what doesn’t, take your self back over to Hillary’s side and stay There!!! TROLL!!!
and facilitating THAT, was what Benghazi was all about.
It’s why they died...and it is also why Clinton and Obama would not lift a finger to help them...and fired the Admirals and Generals who were willing to try.
A few brave, loyal Americans on the ground kept it from being a total slaughter.
I am certain that Clinton and Obama were hoping that everyone at the Consulate and the Annex was going to die.
That they didn’t led to the lies about the attacks and their motivation...and will ultimately lead to the whole sordid, ugly, treacherous, traitorous truth coming out.
The email was posted in 217.
Was that email was sent on an unsecure server?
While this does not match the headline, it seems clear to me that here is a smoking gun of another kind:
If she failed to follow security protocol, she had endangered special forces as well as US allies by sending out that email. It revealed plans that could have tipped off ISIS. And since she pointed out the need for ‘surprise’, that makes it all the worse.
Very clear. A secretary of state is not supposed to accept bribes from foreign governments — period.
She calls it a ‘charitable foundation’. But that claim has been blown out of the water a long time ago.
Here’s an example of the flip-side:
The King of Bahrain donates land for the construction of a new Coptic church
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3480388/posts
And the Clintons shook him down for $ 30 million, money that could have been used to help Coptic Christian refugees!
This king has done his best to maintain public tranquility and to follow the Golden Rule. But the Clintons only care about one thing.
I would agree with that. Still, she talks of defeating ISIL (ISIS). She’s not trying to advance it’s cause or create a situation where it is successful.
I noted in the comments at 217 it is stated the she is destabilizing the region by getting one faction to go against another. That seems like so much hogwash.
We have many people on this forum that don’t want us to send over troops. So how do we facilitate the end of ISIS, if not to help folks in the region do it?
We argue here for one thing. Then we argue against the only choice left.
There are times when some of us just get nutty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.