Skip to comments.
Reuters-Ipsos Poll Showing Hillary Up by 6 Pts. Sampled 44% Dem, 33% Rep (Actual Result Trump +2.5%)
The Gateway Pundit ^
| Sep 29th, 2016
| Jim Hoft
Posted on 09/29/2016 9:35:15 AM PDT by xzins
The latest Ipsos-Reuters poll has Hillary up 6 points over Donald Trump.
For this poll, Ipsos spoke to 1705 Americans, of whom 752 were Democrats.
ipsos-poll-fraud
Thats 44 percent of the total.
Only 29 percent of Americans identify as Democrats.
Ipsos spoke to 570 Republicans for the poll.
Thats 33 percent of the total.
Thats media fraud.
Prepare for the landslide.
UPDATE: Via Zero Hedge
Using Reuters data, Hillary supposedly has a 6-point lead over Trump. However, if we alter the sample data to reflect what Pew says is the real distribution of democrats versus republicans (i.e. 33% vs. 29%, respectively) and apply the same support levels by party affiliation it results in an 8.5% swing toward Trump who would have a 2.5% lead
.very inconvenient.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016polls; elections; fraud; hillary; mediabias; polls; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
To: xzins
In 2015 Registered Republicans were 39% of the population, and 43% were Democrat.
To: heights
I thin it’ll be D+4 or D+5 tops
102
posted on
09/29/2016 12:40:08 PM PDT
by
NYC-RepublicanCT
(Trump vs Media/Dems/Obamas/NeverTrumpers. Still winning!!!)
To: Sam Gamgee
1041 x .44 = 458.04
1041 x .33 = 343.53
103
posted on
09/29/2016 12:43:31 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: NYC-RepublicanCT
I think itll be D+4 or D+5 tops For turnout? No way. The GOP is going to beat the Dems at turnout, or at least be almost even. The enthusiasm gap remains massive, and will drive the result.
Vote Trump!
104
posted on
09/29/2016 12:44:26 PM PDT
by
sargon
(The Revolution is ON! Vote Trump!)
To: xzins
So she leads 458 to 343????
To: sargon
Whether it’s even or D+5, I don’t see a realistic scenario where Trump loses... popular maybe (as Cali and NY run up the totals) but not EV.
106
posted on
09/29/2016 12:59:33 PM PDT
by
NYC-RepublicanCT
(Trump vs Media/Dems/Obamas/NeverTrumpers. Still winning!!!)
To: NYC-RepublicanCT
You’ve been here Two-weeks, and on every post, you’re just so concerned. If you’re here after the election, which I doubt, maybe then I will believe you...
107
posted on
09/29/2016 1:10:29 PM PDT
by
heights
To: NYC-RepublicanCT
that’s disgusting.
please GOD let us win and God forbid we dont, let’s not just go back to the couches.
I know that’s what i want to do, it’ comfortable and safe, but we CANT. we just cant.
108
posted on
09/29/2016 1:28:19 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: heights
Is there a limit to how often someone can post? No? Then go bug someone else. Is this some type of immature hazing? Lame
109
posted on
09/29/2016 1:35:16 PM PDT
by
NYC-RepublicanCT
(Trump vs Media/Dems/Obamas/NeverTrumpers. Still winning!!!)
To: heights
Its also a 100% on-line poll... That alone should disqualify this poll altogether... By the way, I believe the gap is only 4% in a 4-way battleHow is the above being "concerned"? It's an opinion, and discounts this fraudulent poll... Or are you just looking to throw your weight around?
110
posted on
09/29/2016 1:37:03 PM PDT
by
NYC-RepublicanCT
(Trump vs Media/Dems/Obamas/NeverTrumpers. Still winning!!!)
To: Grampa Dave
lol
At the debate Hillary reminded my of a grumpy shopping mall Santa Claus - all she needed was a hat and beard.
111
posted on
09/29/2016 1:38:09 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Biggirl
If I were king I would ban publication of any polling data within, say 6 months of the election. Campaigns would still be permitted to conduct internal polling for their own analysis, but within that 6 month window none of it could be made public. That would eliminate the obviously out of control problem of rigging polling assumptions to manipulate public perception.
112
posted on
09/29/2016 1:41:24 PM PDT
by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: sargon
And don’t forget that some percentage of dems are going to vote for Trump this time around, while very few Republicans will do the same in reverse.
113
posted on
09/29/2016 1:44:01 PM PDT
by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: NYC-RepublicanCT
To keep it simple round to 1000. So 33% registered democrats time 84% that will vote Hillary = 277. 29% registered gop times 78% that plan to vote trump = 226. Even if trump gets 27% (to Hillary 20%) of the remaining 380 votes non affiliated it is not enough. Ends up at 36 to 34% in Hillarys favor.
To: Sam Gamgee
Agreed. Thanks for the stats
115
posted on
09/29/2016 2:35:06 PM PDT
by
NYC-RepublicanCT
(Trump vs Media/Dems/Obamas/NeverTrumpers. Still winning!!!)
To: Sam Gamgee
116
posted on
09/29/2016 3:47:23 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: xzins
Truth. Truth is Trump will lose. Crooked Hillary will cheat. A pollster is going to broadcast exit polls in detail beginning when polls open and all day until polls close. Media will air it. Clinton will know what states she needs stolen.
117
posted on
09/29/2016 3:48:03 PM PDT
by
TornadoAlley3
( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
To: xzins
118
posted on
09/29/2016 3:51:30 PM PDT
by
TornadoAlley3
( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
To: dowcaet
I really hope you are right becuase I am sure the dims will steal 8-10% meaning we need to actually win by 12-15% to avoid endless recounts etc.
Don’t vote absentee and don’t vote early unless it’s the last minute. Make it as hard as possible for them to know how many votes they need to manufacture.
And please don’t vote third party, leave blank or write in Mickey Mouse.
119
posted on
09/29/2016 4:09:49 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
To: Genoa
The oversampling of Democrats is based in large part on the high enthusiasm level for Obama in the last two elections (compared to McCain and Romney). Its totally not like that this time.You are correct. The pollsters know the enthusiasm factor for Hillary is bupkus compared to Obama's; but his '08 and '12 Dem turnout numbers are the ones they're using.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson