Posted on 09/12/2016 3:00:41 AM PDT by Zakeet
Clinton's health is no longer a background issue in the presidential race.
The footage of her entry to her ride out is especially troubling: She's leaning oddly backward as she waits, and plainly almost collapses as she moves toward the vehicle; a mob of aides then conveys her inside.
Also telling is that her staff avoided alerting the press that travels with her - and were left to catch up after noticing her missing. Clinton's brief walkabout some 90 minutes later, after she'd rested in daughter Chelsea's apartment, settles nothing. Nor does word late Sunday that she has pneumonia.
We hadn't made much of Clinton's long coughing fit last week, but that now seems more disturbing, too. Maybe her repeated memory failures when the FBI interviewed her over her e-mail abuses were actually real, rather than dodges of questions she didn’t dare answer truthfully.
Even her refusal to hold a single real press conference for more than nine months suddenly looks different: Is she dodging the press to avoid questions about all her endless scandals, or does she fear something else?
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Neither she nor Trump will take their jackets off and expose their vests. That’s a non-issue.
You give the media too much credit, they are just an organ of the Democrat party trying to fix the election for their candidate.
Well, I don't know why Lisa Bardack is her doctor, but both of the things you cite (top medical school and patient reviews) are more or less meaningless.
Dr. Bardack may be great, or she may not. I don't know her, and I don't know anyone who does. That she's being used by a very powerful organization is at least as plausible as the inference that she's a bad doctor.
She was wearing a shirt beneath her unbuttoned jacket.
Patient doctor confidentiality. She is not allowed to say anything unless given permission to do so.
That is well understood. But it also is not free license to lie and omit.
Patients lie to, conceal from, and deceive their doctors every single day.
You do not know what Dr. Bardack knows, you do not know what she’s been told, and you don’t know how much she sees HRC, or where, or when.
Writing a “doctor’s note” so somebody can run for President is unwise, but an appeal to vanity almost always works with us doctors.
The jury is out on Dr. Bardack.
Given the news surrounding her initial “bill of clean health” for Clinton that mainly centered on remediation efforts for prior mishaps is one thing.
Continuing to “vainly” fall (as you put it) for continued manipulation, especially with the plethora of health irregularities even spotted by laymen, media and health professionals alike is far beyond doctor-patient privilege, in my opinion.
As for your other “you do not knows”.....yes, none of us knows fully because the Clinton Cabal is rigorously silent and deceitful about it all. If this doctor only saw her once or twice, then that should be noted, and she shouldn’t allow herself to be trotted out as her continuing physician that ‘has it all under control’ and ‘nothing to see here, folks’.
Since you’ve implied you’re a doctor, would you having diagnosed Clinton with pneumonia on a Friday, allow her to go out in public on a Sunday? Would you further approve of said patient with Pneumonia being around children in close contact?
This whole health stuff stinks to high heaven and a doctor that took his job seriously wouldn’t be a part of it.
I don’t care what swirl of events unfold....as long as she ultimately dies in prison alongside Bill and the Chelse.
You may be right.
And...no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges on such a sick, old lady
Lie, no. Omit, absolutely. She is not at liberty to speak on the issue without consent from the patient. That she may have chosen to speak a partial truth is wrong but it is a very fine line in reality. Crossing that line could cost her, her entire career. Remaining silent, in the case of Hillary, just might cost her, her life.
There is still the issue of how the press was protecting her and covering up the issue.
The only reason the health story got “hot” was due to video footage from someone’s cell phone.
She was not recorded by press, leaving the scene.
Did not say she was bad just not a well known, widely respected doctor that one might expect a snob like Hillary to see.
Absolutely, and if the patient refuses to do tests recommended by the doctor then the doctor can be totally ignorant as to the real truth, and only left with educated guesses.
No one knows what Dr. Bardack knows, that's true. However, we also do not know if her knowledge is actually limited to what she has been allowed to discuss in public, due to obfuscation, as well as, refusal by the patient to submit to further tests.
The jury in this case has to be the American voter, that should be limited to Hillary, and not include Dr. Bardack.
Excellent observation.
Their reaction was the equivalent of a person’s reaction to a nosebleed. Those who nosebleed often react quickly and without a fuss. Those who never have them freak out.
They reacted quickly and without a fuss.
Excellent observation.
Their reaction was the equivalent of a person’s reaction to a nosebleed. Those who nosebleed often react quickly and without a fuss. Those who never have them freak out.
They reacted quickly and without a fuss.
Maybe, and maybe. Not enough information to answer either question.
I believe the "pneumonia diagnosis" was 9/2, not 9/9, implying nine days of Rx before the 9/11 event. If that's true, I would not expect her to be contagious (and many forms of pneumonia are not).
Beyond all that - you have a woman with a chronic cough, who has been carried with a diagnosis of "allergies". Hopefully, there's a negative chest x ray at some point to support that diagnosis, but we don't know. NOW, your "allergies" patient has no only a chronic cough, but an abnormal chest X ray.
Step one, with regard to the X ray, is to treat with antibiotics and hope the abnormality goes away.
Along with the antibiotics comes a diagnosis of "pneumonia". Remember, the government no longer allows "rule out" or "suspicion of" as diagnoses, or as justification for tests.
It's much too soon to evaluate the care HRC has been getting, but, like any other sociopath and congenital liar, it's possible she's been fool
"like any other sociopath and congenital liar, it's possible she's been fooling her doctor".
Hillary Clinton’s health is now a real issue...
_________________________________________________
Hey NY Post, that lying Skank’s health has BEEN a real issue for months while all of you phony journalists have been refusing to report it. But the good news is that your readers have learned that most of what you print about this blatant liar are simply more lies to help her cover her fat a*s.
[”I feel creepy trying to find something funny about this.”]
Good theme song for the next (if ever) HILLARY CLINTON rally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.