Patients lie to, conceal from, and deceive their doctors every single day.
You do not know what Dr. Bardack knows, you do not know what she’s been told, and you don’t know how much she sees HRC, or where, or when.
Writing a “doctor’s note” so somebody can run for President is unwise, but an appeal to vanity almost always works with us doctors.
The jury is out on Dr. Bardack.
Given the news surrounding her initial “bill of clean health” for Clinton that mainly centered on remediation efforts for prior mishaps is one thing.
Continuing to “vainly” fall (as you put it) for continued manipulation, especially with the plethora of health irregularities even spotted by laymen, media and health professionals alike is far beyond doctor-patient privilege, in my opinion.
As for your other “you do not knows”.....yes, none of us knows fully because the Clinton Cabal is rigorously silent and deceitful about it all. If this doctor only saw her once or twice, then that should be noted, and she shouldn’t allow herself to be trotted out as her continuing physician that ‘has it all under control’ and ‘nothing to see here, folks’.
Since you’ve implied you’re a doctor, would you having diagnosed Clinton with pneumonia on a Friday, allow her to go out in public on a Sunday? Would you further approve of said patient with Pneumonia being around children in close contact?
This whole health stuff stinks to high heaven and a doctor that took his job seriously wouldn’t be a part of it.
Absolutely, and if the patient refuses to do tests recommended by the doctor then the doctor can be totally ignorant as to the real truth, and only left with educated guesses.
No one knows what Dr. Bardack knows, that's true. However, we also do not know if her knowledge is actually limited to what she has been allowed to discuss in public, due to obfuscation, as well as, refusal by the patient to submit to further tests.
The jury in this case has to be the American voter, that should be limited to Hillary, and not include Dr. Bardack.