Skip to comments.
Huma Abedin denies active role at radical Muslim journal
New York Post ^
| August 21, 2016
| Paul Sperry
Posted on 08/22/2016 6:37:46 AM PDT by detective
Top Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin played no formal role in a radical Muslim journal — even though she was listed as an editor on the hate-filled periodical’s masthead for a dozen years, a campaign rep claimed Sunday.
“My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said hours after The Post broke the bombshell story. “She did not play a role in editing at the publication.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintonhuma; humabio; humaradicalislam; humaradicalmuslim; muslims; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: detective
To: detective
42
posted on
08/22/2016 6:59:01 AM PDT
by
jpsb
(Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
To: NEMDF
Indeed. We are well past needing hip waders.
43
posted on
08/22/2016 6:59:57 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: detective
She should say it was akin to Obama at Harvard Law Review - no work done, just resume padding.
44
posted on
08/22/2016 7:00:36 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: pinkandgreenmom
Are we really supposed to believe this?
That's the plan.
45
posted on
08/22/2016 7:02:21 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: detective
"The Clinton campaign is lying and hopes people are too stupid to understand the truth." I think the Clinton Campaign hopes (knows) the mainstream media will bury the story and the people will never hear the truth.
To: detective
Top Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin played no formal role in a radical Muslim journal — even though she was listed as an editor on the hate-filled periodical’s masthead for a dozen years, a campaign rep claimed Sunday. Then maybe she should have seen to it that her name was not used. Another typical lie / denial from the Clinton campaign.
47
posted on
08/22/2016 7:03:05 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty.)
To: detective
Sure Huma, whatever you say...
48
posted on
08/22/2016 7:04:12 AM PDT
by
Paulie
(America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
To: txrefugee
"Where were the watchdogs in the CIA?"
The current head of the CIA is a muslim convert.
49
posted on
08/22/2016 7:04:23 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: detective
After reading a couple of articles, it just may happen that Huma gets thrown under the bus.
Huma is a muzzie through and through.
To: hal ogen
Hey, Obama spent 20 years in Jeremiah Wright’s church and got a pass; should we expect anything different?
51
posted on
08/22/2016 7:07:05 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Donald Trump, warts and all, is not a public enemy. The Golems in the GOP are stasis and apathy)
To: detective
She was listed as "editor", but did no editing.
Just like Obama, who was listed on the "Harvard Law Review", but did no reviewing.
To: detective
Undermining and overthrowing government of the United States is a tough job. I’m sure pappy muslim cut her some slack.
53
posted on
08/22/2016 7:08:22 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Authors frequently write these things themselves.
54
posted on
08/22/2016 7:09:58 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: detective
But Clinton people say Huma did no editing. She was paid to be a figurehead on the terrorist supporting magazine but Huma did no work for the magazine. Ah! I get it! A paid figurehead, sorta like Hillary!™ as Secretary of State!
I wonder witch one was more responsible for Benghazi?...
55
posted on
08/22/2016 7:10:57 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Has there ever been a death associated with the Clintons that *wasn't* beneficial to them?)
To: proudpapa
An editor who did no editing??? Then why even list her?
YUGE name recognition???
56
posted on
08/22/2016 7:12:24 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Has there ever been a death associated with the Clintons that *wasn't* beneficial to them?)
To: detective
1992: “I smoked but I didn’t inhale”
2016: “My name was on the masthead but I didn’t have an active role”
To: Rebelbase
Because in the Muslim world, unknown, 20-year old, FEMALE figureheads have respect akin to that of an Imam. Why yes, yes of course!
58
posted on
08/22/2016 7:14:02 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Has there ever been a death associated with the Clintons that *wasn't* beneficial to them?)
To: detective
59
posted on
08/22/2016 7:14:12 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: detective
Headline lies.
Huma, herself, did not deny...a Clinton spokesperson denied
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
