Enough with the Trump is Hitler already.
The MSM demonstrates that there is no lower limit to their stupidity..
When the ignorant idiotess retires, she can spout her silliness.
She wants to go to bed with the handsome Trump bit she knows she is too ugly so she is sexially harassing Trump by abusing her position of power under the color of authority and to try and get his attention because she is an obsessed dithering of egyptian mummy wrapped in black robes wearing those stupid ovrrsize drink cuasters as ties that she wanted to market in competition with Trump ties but she wastes a lot of time with vibrators that do nothing for her and what is really setting her off is that old lady smell she has that the other justices have been secretly complaing about.
She also needs to stay away from Thomas, he isn’t her little black toy baby who needs her mama sympathy and “love”.
Wrong question.
The question should be “When is Ginsburg going to speak out against the lawbreaker Hillary Clinton?”
She blatantly violated cannon 5 of the judicial cannons. She is not a judge — she is a political HACK!!
She is displaying exactly the kind of jurist that can be expected from Hitlery.
AND she just nullified herself, which this buffoon author does not understand.
When a normal citizen questions the possible biases or motivations of a judge. In that case he's shouted down and called all sorts of terrible things.
Until she retires, never. She may have all the opinions she wants. As a justice, she is supposed to remain politically aloof in her decisions and pronouncements.
Back in the 1700's, people's life expectancies were much lower than today.
They thought that a SC justice, appointed in his/her late 50's or 60's would probably serve no more than about 10 years.
Now, turds like RBG live well into their 80's. Medical technology can keep people alive well beyond age 70.
I would propose an amendment - SC justices must be "re-approved" by the Senate every 10 years.
She has shown a complete lack of judicial prudence in her comments and in her “threat” to move to another country. And, the Sac Bee’s attempt to insert Hitlerian imagery into the minds of it’s readers is idiotic. Especially given that it is Trump’s opposition that more closely resembles the Brown Shirts (Matter) of the 1930’s.
This guy is too much of a dumbass to waste time arguing with him.
How can she be a “brilliant jurist” when how she is going to vote is known before any arguments are heard?
She was never a good judge. She was Bill Clinton’s pay back to Planned Parenthood.
Judges voluntarily give up a measure of their first amendment rights when the take the bench. It is a requirement of office. All judges and justices are bound by the canons. Ginsburg violated Canon 5 of the federal rules.
Hubler knows this, but he hates Trump, thus the rules don’t matter.
Simple for the left—the end always justifies the means. They see themselves as above the law.
They don't even try to hide it.
It’s one thing to criticize a president by name in a Supreme Court decision for his policies involved in a case before the court. Or to criticize a politician in private. It’s another to publicly criticize a presidential candidate in the media.
When is the First Amendment not the First Amendment? Apparently, when a liberal U.S. Supreme Court justice exercises it to voice alarm at the possibility that Donald Trump might become the next president.
Hopefully she will resign after the election and move to a country that is more in tune with her beliefs.
One point that puzzles me however, is why she has not resigned before now to let Obama pick her replacement.
Dje Dje
Ginsburg has gone beyond stating a personal opinion. She is interfering with a public election for POTUS. She can be impeached if members of the US House of Representatives find that her comments violate the "good behavior" required of all federal judges by the US Constitution. I think that they do. Her remarks are biased, unprecedented, and reveal an inability to render impartial judgements. For the sake of the nation, she should apologize for undermining public trust in the nation's courts and resign immediately.
Anybody live near the “Bee” can yell a #### you when they pass it for me?
Where did this rag come from. It’s CA’s version of the NY Times.
Trump, to the contrary, is the one who has gone after--aggressively gone after the "politically correct" bullies, who have been stifling free discussion of vital social & political & legal issues, for the past quarter century. The bigots are the ones who insist that all of the rest of us simply accept their insulting views on social, political & ethnic questions.
The bigot in this case is the Justice, who throws over the normal restraints that go with her position, to vilify one who chooses to dissent from her very biased position. The writer is even more pathetic. She is so imbued with an insulting narrative against dissenters, that she seems to actually think it necessary for a sitting Supreme Court Justice to slander a Presidential candidate--because the Ginsburg tirade was indeed slanderous. (Now I know that the Court has held that public figures can be slandered with impunity--but one expects something a little better from the Justices themselves.)