BREAKING: FBI RECOMMENDS NO PROSECUTION OF HILLARY CLINTON!!!

FOX NEWS LIVE ^ | 07-05-2016 | cww

[CWW]

WOW -- JUST WOW!!!

sloppiness, negligence, etc. but not willful and intentional acts

162 emails contained classified email.

8 - top secret

2000 emails up classified to make confidential.

Several thousand work-related emails discovered that Hillary didn't disclose.

No evidence of intentional deletion.

Evidence of Extreme Carelessness in Handling Email. There's evidence that Hillary and others should have known that handling of emails was improper.

No proof of hacking, but hacking by hostile actors may have occurred.

FBI Recommends: No Prosecution.

[theoilpainter]

We will always have the rule of law, it’s just that it will apply to some more than others.

Were I a powerful Senator or Governor of a big state, tomorrow I would set up my own charitable foundation - because I want to do my best for mankind, of course - and solicit money from all types who do business in my state or branch of the fed government. I’d incorporate a branch in Canada, and use it to launder money into my fun account.

And if some agency wants to subpoena my records, I’ll just destroy any evidence the records ever existed.

Apparently, this works in the new USA.

[VTenigma]

If they can rig this they will rig the election too.

---

Post of the day, you win the internet! And you can be assured of this outcome too.

[Auslander154]

Ambassador to Kenya ( Gration ) was fired by Clinton’s State Dept. for using Google gmail.

http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/05/hillarys-state-dept-forced-the-resignation-of-an-ambassador-for-using-private-e-mail/

“The New York Times wrote that Gration “preferred to use Gmail for official business and set up private offices in his residence — and an embassy bathroom — to work outside the purview of the embassy staff.”

[timestax]

[uncbob]

I've listened to the FBI statement twice and it is clear he says Hillary broke the law.

He sure did

But then he essentially said no prosecutor wanted to be the one to take the case

[Mr. Jeeves]

It’s better this way. Indict her, and she becomes the victim. Now the corruption allegation just sits there - stinking - all the way until the election.

[Sarah Barracuda]

I really dont get why so many are shocked. I knew from day 1 no charges would be filed..after all its the CLINTONS, they have been getting away with MURDER for 30+ years now..everyone knows that meeting with Bill and Loretta was to ensure no charges are filed..yeah it was about talking about the “Grandkids” more like “Loretta, if you dont want to be in a body bag you know what to do” the system has always been rigged..this country has gone to hell since Obama was elected..America is weeping

[justa-hairyape]

She will be elected. After the FBI basically falls on their sword for her ? You do not sacrifice that organization for someone who may not be President. She will be President. Voter fraud will be done first. Everyone needs to check with their states to verify no one has screwed with their absentee voter status or party affiliation. Barring voter fraud and mass media attacks on Trump, there will be physical attacks on Trump. It is over. All that matters now is will you go out standing up or bending over. The good people of Venezuela went out bending over when they allowed criminals to run their government. Now they are starving to death.

[flaglady47]

“lunatic”?”

Sick bastard is more like it. Clarence Thomas is a Catholic, as is Sam Alito. As was Antonin Scalia. Three out of five Justices are/were honorable men. Justice Roberts is gay and compromised, IMO; Justice Kennedy is a liberal. Three liberal Justices are Jews. Let’s hear you badmouth the Jews too. Come on, I double dare you. Give it to them. Less safe to do so, isn’t it? Half assed remarks by a halfast brain.

[hondact200]

Hillary for Prison 2016 Flag is Up. the Hildabeast committed a crime. Okay the guy whom was just indicted for a crime should be free, as Hillary committed no crime so this guy did nothing wrong either.

[Enchante]

For convenience, I've isolated the key summary of facts from Comey's statement. While he shrinks from drawing the necessary implications, it is clear that Hillary has broken multiple laws, behaved with extreme negligence wrt our national security, led the State Dept. in a "security culture" which was extremely deficient and reckless, and mishandled secret and top secret materials in ways that would end the careers and the very freedom of "lesser" mortals:

===================================================

....

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

....

With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”

....

That’s what we have done. Now let me tell you what we found:

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

[cblue55]

.......in other news, Obama and Hillary in Charlotte NC today to begin the FU America Tour.

[Chaguito]

I doubt it. He’s over to the dark side.

[flaglady47]

“I’m a social observer. Trump needs to focus. Focus on jobs and let Hillary implode on her own. Questions will come about the Clinton Foundation soon.”

I have not used this word before, but I will now. You are an unmitigated troll. Get the hell off of this thread.

[Auslander154]

Thank you for being an honest government employee - a vanishing breed. Hope you are recovered from your heart attack.

I do believe it will be even easier to beat Hillary after the blatant ( for all to see who want to see) corruption in the past 4 days. If she had been indicted, we would be facing Biden.

My dream is that Trump gets elected and his justice department goes after both Clintons - the foundation and the emails.

[VTenigma]

that is why they never explain or answer questions

---

No one even asks questions anymore.

[nicksaunt]

No you are not mistaken, this stinks to high heaven.

I just read a tweet from Laura Ingraham. She tweeted, "HRC lied about not sending or receiving classified info. So how does that not help inform a finding of "intent?"

[CivilWarBrewing]

'Comey D. Clown' says he "did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information,"

First, she absolutely DID intend to violate laws, and secondly, even if she didn't INTEND on violating laws SHE STILL VIOLATED THE LAW. Section 18 doesn't give a rats arse about 'INTENT', Comey D. Clown!!!!

Think of all the thousands of people with security clearances across America who will now NOT GIVE A CR*P ABOUT PROTECTING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION!!!!

[thoughtomator]

This is total bullshit. It’s the complete abandonment of the Rule of Law.

I hope the FBI revolts and the truth gets out there. This woman MUST NOT be allowed to become President.

[Vic S]

How does Comey interogate Hillary for 3 hours and 2 days later say that there is no recommendation for indictiment?

Doesn’t he have to go over her statements with other people’s statements and crossreference her statements to statements she made to other committees?

That alone should take weeks. The fix was in, he knew there would be no indictment before he interviewed her.