Posted on 07/05/2016 3:28:29 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.
Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran! Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”
Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.
Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran! Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”
It’s true.
In January 2013, Pravda celebrated the Russian atomic energy agency’s purchase of the company “Uranium One” in Canada.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
And faggot.
bkmk
Not that I can share because the information is sensitive and confidential but I will say this. I prepare analytical reports and executive summaries after conducting investigations so I gather a LOT of facts. Sometimes my cases are so big I have to keep track of a massive amount of information so I use either databases or spreadsheets. This helps me understand the intel I've developed out of all the information so I can process it and understand what I've learned. Having said all that the human brain is much better at processing information if it's put into categories or summarized. There has to be an order to it or it just shuts down. Or at least that's my experience.
Tables are very effective at summarizing the info in an easy to read format especially if you lay it out with columns that migh say something like "Date of Action", "Action by Clintons" then something like "Result". This is just one example but simplification with links to a more detailed explanation if they want to look works good. I often bookmark the detail explanations or footnotes in my report and put a hyperlink in the table where they can click and go to it in a document.
Before you embark on that journey I suggest you look to see if someone else has already done it. If they have tell them you want to help assist their efforts and become a researcher or assistant for them. They usually won't mind at all...: )
Thanks for explaining some of the method of clear and easily digested information. I will take your advice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.