Posted on 06/23/2016 7:41:15 AM PDT by georgiegirl
Breaking news by Stu Varney. Supreme Court was tied 4 to 4, so the lower court decision stands against Obama's Immigration plan.
“So far Husseins Muslim terrorists handlers are right. Americans are stupid enough to let the Muslims succeed.”
Spot on. This is the lens that everything must be seen in regards to this terrorist in the white mosque.
Scrotus rulings are irrelevant. Treason and lawlessness abounds.
....Or will be force to fight back and fight back BIG. That is one of the reasons why guns and ammo has been flying off the shelves.
Looking forward to when Mr. Trump is elected.
I agree, and I'm not about to start use of it.
The only reason I introduced the concept was to clarify my thoughts, since the courts affix the label "constitutional" to actions that are not constitutional. "Constitutional" is defined by the victor, not by the law or the constitution.
JUDGE ANDREW HANEN FOR VICE PRESIDENT....OR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE...HE SAVED THIS COUNTRY
Yep.. And here’s to hoping they’ll both be lame ducks.
The judge must send the Marshalls and arrest him for contempt of court
ditto the Lynch woman
then let them bitch a while from jail
Excellent!
Anothrr article on this from the Washington Post:
The article said:
“Supreme Court was tied 4 to 4, so the lower court decision stands against Obama’s Immigration plan.”
hussein will fire back with 500,000 more muslim “refuges”..
If you believe that then you're ripe for the rule of man which is tyranny - what we have now.
No, "constitutional" is the rule of law of the Constitution itself AS WRITTEN and ORIGINALLY understood and intended which is essentially what we had for the first 125 years before the ungodly lurch to the Left in the 20th Century spiritually and politically.
Who is actually going to do their duty to stop tyranny? First you have to understand what that duty is, which many do not. It is not irrelevant - it is how uprisings against tyranny start because it puts you on the moral and legal high ground, very important.
Much of the reason we don’t have too many “whos” is many don’t understand their constitutionally protected rights and freedoms. For instance few get that states have the moral and legal high ground to nullify unconstitutional federal acts which are acts of tyranny.
Once enough people understood that, it would be easier to find those who would actually take that moral and legal high ground against the feds.
I can work with either definition of "constitutional," and prefer to not argue over what the label means. My point is that the victor claims his actions are constitutional. As you point out, the "rule of man" that the PTB impose these days is labeled "constitutional" by the courts and the government. The official word (for what that is worth) is that homosexual marriage, affirmative action, deprivation of rights by entry on a secret list, unfettered snooping, etc. are "constitutional."
SCOTUS has Alice in Wonderland powers, and it is eager to use them.
I don't personally grant them legitimacy, but if push comes to shove, they'd kill me and laugh about it.
I just heard the won talking about how terrible we are ripping children from their parents arms. Nothing yet about ripping babies from the womb and selling the parts.
Again, don’t acquiesce to the Leftist lies. Just because the Left (and those gullible enough to believe the Left, “constitutional” doesn’t make it so.
I’ve given a reasonable definition of what is actually “constitutional” supported by renowned constitutional scholars such as Judge Bork. Left says its constitutional because SCOTUS says it is. Don’t let the Lying Left make up their own definitions for you.
And if it comes to Left coming to kill you, be ready to shoot first.
Breaking news by Stu Varney. Supreme Court was tied 4 to 4, so the lower court decision stands against Obama’s Immigration plan.
Since when has the US Constitution’s limits ever stopped obama from doing whatever he wants????
I'll use whichever the label or definition my correspondent prefers - arguing over labels and definitions is usually a waste of time, so I let the other guy define it, and argue my point from there.
-- Left says its constitutional because SCOTUS says it is. --
Plenty of righties use that formula too. Especially the law and order types.
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
posted on September 29, 2012 at 1:20:20 PM CDT by LucyT.
Yup, a lot of duped folks out there. We have a lot of work to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.