Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Again, don’t acquiesce to the Leftist lies. Just because the Left (and those gullible enough to believe the Left, “constitutional” doesn’t make it so.

I’ve given a reasonable definition of what is actually “constitutional” supported by renowned constitutional scholars such as Judge Bork. Left says its constitutional because SCOTUS says it is. Don’t let the Lying Left make up their own definitions for you.

And if it comes to Left coming to kill you, be ready to shoot first.


116 posted on 06/23/2016 11:24:03 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216
I'm not acquiescing. I'm mocking the illegitimate edicts put out by the courts, even though they are labeled "constitutional" by the entities that issue them.

I'll use whichever the label or definition my correspondent prefers - arguing over labels and definitions is usually a waste of time, so I let the other guy define it, and argue my point from there.

-- Left says its constitutional because SCOTUS says it is. --

Plenty of righties use that formula too. Especially the law and order types.

118 posted on 06/23/2016 11:46:50 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson