Posted on 06/16/2016 9:38:48 PM PDT by Williams
We are living through Benghazi 2, only this time the attack was in America with far more casualties.
Obama and Hillary knew they had a major problem with the worst terror massacre since 9/11. Trump predicted this right down to the wife and father's silent complicity. But there are far more chickens coming home to roost at the White House.
The killer's father is a radical Taliban-supporting Afghan. He was also a visitor to both the White House and State Department.
The Obama administration has been negotiating with the Taliban on a power sharing arrangement in Afghanistan. The Taliban control ever increasing amounts of Afghanistan.
Indeed this father fancied himself a future Afghan president. In short, the father who radicalized his son was favorably treated by the Obama government. That's a very close connection.
Next we hear there was an attempt to alert the FBI about the killer's weapons purchases. But Obama has instituted policies that prevent the FBI from treating suspicious Muslims with heightened scrutiny. The FBI reportedly is very upset about those policies. Very likely they led here to a failure to investigate.
And did the father's involvement with our government also play a role there?
Within a day of Obama angrily attacking republicans and blaming guns, claiming again ISIS is on the ropes and that curtailing Muslim refugees would be unAmerican - we have the incredible spectacle of the CIA director completely contradicting Obama.
Shades of Petraeus at the CIA refusing to support the Benghazi/ YouTube video cover story.
The father was huddling with the killer's wife after the massacre. What connections does he have? Will he be prosecuted as a terrorist and have it come out he was favorably received by the WH, State, and democrat notables like Rangel? They appear to have welcomed a foreign born Muslim radical who is complicit in a mass murder terror attack.
We have the spectacle of the wife casing out the possible murder scenes with her husband, helping him equip for the killings, texting "I love you" as he slaughtered. And she "tried to talk him out of it" like you might ask your husband not to go out for the night with his drinking buddies.
This whole story stinks to the high heavens with White House and Taliban complicity, with abysmal behavior by Muslims who obviously placed their cultural loyalties above the lives of countless innocents - and this is why Obama is lying and angrily denouncing conservatives just as he did after Benghazi.
Holy cow. That is amazing info. His father was trying to get the US State Department to overthrow the Afghanistan government and install him as President. Through election or their usual tactics. And he was aligned with the Taliban. So the US State Department under Obama replaced the government of Libya with terrorists. Tried to replace the Egyptian government with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists. Are still trying to replace the Syrian government with rebel terrorists. And over throw the Ukraine government with Nazi sympathizers. And apparently over throwing the Afghanistan government with Taliban terrorists was possibly next on the agenda. Our troops over there are in grave danger. And apparently an existing Afghan general wanted to personally travel to the US to kill the father.
“He is the most dangerous man in the world right now.”
“He is the most dangerous man in the world right now.”
Ultimately, this is his fault for running interference for islamic terrorists, making excuses for militant behavior and inciting liberal narratives that have no basis in reality.
Plus, it’s his appointee at the Bureau.
I like your graphic. My tagline is to an old link to an old article from 1938 regarding the New Deal. The long article has LOTS of stuff that obama has furthered - even the wording that FDR used shows up in obama’s speech.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts
Excerpt:
“Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.
But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense, and secondly, it took off from nothing that was implicit in the American scheme. It took off from a revolutionary base.
The design was European. Regarded from the point of view of revolutionary technic it made perfect sense. Its meaning was revolutionary and it had no other. For what it meant to do it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake....
Having passed this crisis, the New Deal went on from one problem to another, taking them in the proper order, according to revolutionary technic; and if the handling of one was inconsistent with the handling of another, even to the point of nullity, that was blunder in reverse.
The effect was to keep people excited about one thing at a time, and divided, while steadily through all the uproar of outrage and confusion a certain end, held constantly in view, was pursued by main intention.
The end held constantly in view was power. “
G4S is just a rent-a-mall-cop organization. If the gov’t thinks it needs security of some type...they contract out their guy. There are a couple hundred organizations in the US like this. Go look at the VIP characters who want a private wedding and they contract out security to keep cameras or the journalists from the location. I don’t see where adding regulation will do much to fix this or prevent something in the future.
Yep, it stinks.
G4S changed names (after merger/acquisition) and used to be Wackenhut.
These guys are welded into the intelligence community.
Orlando has the “hall of mirrors” thing going big time.
Obammy,
The moosie enabler
Spot on Williams.
The only way this diversion will be thwarted is by a sustained effort by Trump with whatever help he can get from the GOP.
Ultimately, only a patriot at high level within the FBI can make the case.
WE HAVE LEARNED NOTHING SINCE 9/11/2001.
In fact, we are WORSE off than we were on 9/10/2001. GWB was denounced for the attacks from the moment the smoke had cleared. Yet, the half breed gets a pass, time and time again.
There are many troubling inconsistencies in all the narratives being spun - by the regime, by the media, by Congress and activists on both sides. My biggest concerns are:
1. 49 people killed and 53 wounded = 103 people. Assuming 1 round per person (highly unlikely), he was on his FOURTH magazine. And nobody stopped him? Was there more one gunman?
2. Sig Sauer MCX retails at around $2,000. Where does a security guard get that kind of money?
3. The bouncer and a policeman fired at him when the gunman tried to enter the club - and both missed him. Why bother having a bouncer and a policeman who can’t hit a man at close range? What training, if any, are they getting?
4. Now the wife has “disappeared”. Who is hiding her? Has she been whisked out of the country?
And finally,
5. How many attacks - by Mohammedan terrorists, complicit with the regime - will we stand for?
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
John Harington
I ACCUSE THIS GOVERNMENT OF TREASON.
Always been on the good guy lists for national security ..... its expected that the socialist democrats will put everyone on “that list” on their fabricated “ain’t socialist shit list”. Adjusting “locally”, accordingly ...... plan ahead folks, be self reliant, depend on no one else for your basic needs in life, live within your means ...good and bad times are eternal .
“The father was huddling with the killer’s wife after the massacre. What connections does he have? Will he be prosecuted as a terrorist”.........
At minimum, he too should be charged for an “accessory to commit murder assuming he did know about it in advance.
Here: two plus two seems to be equal four...
The dots are close and easy to believe...
It was reported yesterday that the wife has disappeared.
My thoughts are that the left wants these attacks so they make preventing them as hard as possoble, so they can push their antigun agenda.
Imagine the outrage from the LBGT community if this is the case...the democrats will lose the solidarity of this voting block.
“””The killer’s father is a radical Taliban-supporting Afghan. He was also a visitor to both the White House and State Department.””””
Has the father’s visits to the White House and State Department been verified by MSM? If it really happened it would seem Trump would be making that fact a part of every stump speech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.