1 posted on
06/07/2016 9:28:14 AM PDT by
Zakeet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Zakeet
And they criticized Sarah for spending much less.
2 posted on
06/07/2016 9:29:13 AM PDT by
fwdude
(If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
To: Zakeet
Hey
Clinton foundation .... Hahahahaha
3 posted on
06/07/2016 9:30:12 AM PDT by
zzwhale
To: Zakeet
Hillary wants to look less drab and more exciting.
I wonder if $12,000 buys that upgrade.
To rephrase Shakespeare, the clothes make the woman.
4 posted on
06/07/2016 9:31:17 AM PDT by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: Zakeet
Who in their right mind would pay that much for a freaking jacket?
I’m sure Hildabeast didn’t. It was probably given to her as a “gift.”
5 posted on
06/07/2016 9:31:24 AM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(The root word of vigilante is vigilant!)
To: Zakeet
A bigger,better, more expensive pantsuit....
Yeah.....that’ll do it.
Marko.
6 posted on
06/07/2016 9:31:38 AM PDT by
markoman
(If one gun is justified.....they all are.)
To: Zakeet
$12,000 and she still looks like a slob?
8 posted on
06/07/2016 9:34:19 AM PDT by
oldbill
To: Zakeet
Oh yeah, a $12k Armani jacket is going to make her more relatable.
[/s]
They have an excuse for every occasion.
9 posted on
06/07/2016 9:35:39 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Zakeet
Pigs are flying somewhere: the MSM have criticized a female DEMOCRAT for wearing pricey clothes.
11 posted on
06/07/2016 9:36:22 AM PDT by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Zakeet
Perfect graphic - on point.
The only thing more destined for failure is attempts to make shellie look good.
13 posted on
06/07/2016 9:37:12 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
To: Zakeet
Lately I have seen her wear tops that appear to hide weight gain, designed for plus sizes.
14 posted on
06/07/2016 9:37:25 AM PDT by
Jane Austen
(Neo-cons are Democrats who love war and illegal aliens)
To: Zakeet
I've seen something similar at Home Depot in the Tarp Dept for about $17.50.
15 posted on
06/07/2016 9:38:15 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: Zakeet
It's hard to believe anyone would pay $12k for something that unattractive. The amazing thing though is that the designer probably gave it to Hillary for the free "advertising". Now he's going to make a whole lot of sales to women who want to look just like Hillary . . . to impress the men in their lives.
16 posted on
06/07/2016 9:38:42 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
To: Zakeet
I’d bet a lot that she didn’t pay for it either.
17 posted on
06/07/2016 9:38:45 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.)
To: Zakeet
There is not much that Mrs. Clinton can wear that would help her, as the post menopausal gods have treated her in a most unkind manner; and, (one suspects) that many years of dissolute behavior have taken an appearance toll as well.
5-figure cost Armani suits notwithstanding, most of her pant-suit wardrobe look as if it comes from the Closeout racks from Arkansas Truckstops.
.
19 posted on
06/07/2016 9:38:59 AM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Zakeet
Hey Kenny, you want your suit? There it goes.
20 posted on
06/07/2016 9:40:15 AM PDT by
Old Yeller
(Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
To: Zakeet
No! No! She’s a socialist!
She can’t wait to get to Turnip Commune #34 so she can start pulling turnips for the people!
Hahahahahahahahaha!
27 posted on
06/07/2016 9:47:16 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Zakeet
Despite the cost, whoever picks out Hillary’s wardrobe, has no taste. Those tweedy things she seems to favor just make her look like she’s wearing a cover for some piece of equipment. For example, in some of the pictures above, she looks like a water heater with a head. (I was going to say “a human head”, but we all know that Hillary isn’t human.)
To: Zakeet
Trust me on this— that jacket did *nothing* for you, Hillary. Poundage matters, and yours is now impacting your ability to even navigate.
Forget the coat.
41 posted on
06/07/2016 9:59:30 AM PDT by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey. Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming-- infinitum.)
To: Zakeet
You’ve said it (with much better ‘a picture is worth a thousand words’)
But I am pretty sure Hillary probably did not pay full price for the suit.
I could be wrong, though.
43 posted on
06/07/2016 10:03:40 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = USSR; Journ0List + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey)
To: Zakeet
Hehe.
Somebody posted a YT link to an old HRC interview as the new FLARK.
Best thing I can say is that her current contact lenses (or laser surgery) negates her lack of fashion sense of flattering eyeglass styles.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
