Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Plans to Fire Back at Trump for NRA Remarks
ABC News ^ | May 21, 2016, 4:49 PM ET | By LIZ KREUTZ

Posted on 05/21/2016 6:14:50 PM PDT by drewh

Hillary Clinton plans to fire back at Donald Trump for comments he made to the National Rifle Association, in which he spoke in favor of open carry laws and accused Clinton of wanting to take away the right to bear arms -- a position she has not taken.

According to an aide to the Democratic presidential frontrunner, Clinton will use her remarks tonight at the Trayvon Martin Foundation Circle of Mothers dinner in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, to respond to Trump.

At the event, she is expected to call the presumptive Republican presidential nominee's position on guns "dangerous" and will specifically criticize his proposal to mandate that every school in the country allow guns in classrooms by arguing that it "would make our children less safe," an aide said.

On Friday, Trump received the endorsement of the NRA after he delivered remarks at the organization's annual convention in Lousiville, Kentucky.

Trump used the platform to reiterate his policy promise to eliminate gun-free zones, which exist at some schools and at military bases. And he took aim at Clinton, who has called for stricter background checks and for closing gun-show loopholes that make it easier for people to get firearms.

"The Second Amendment is under a threat like never before," the former reality TV star said. "Crooked Hillary Clinton is the most anti-gun ... candidate ever to run for office. And, as I said before, she wants to abolish the Second Amendment. She wants to take your guns away. She wants to abolish it."

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2ndamendment; banglist; clinton; election2016; guncontrol; gunvote; hillary2016; newyork; nra; secondamendment; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: drewh

hillary does not know what she is asking for... Trump is no wimp... she had better take it slow.. and find out what he has for her before she sticks that foot in her mouth.

Just imagine what a picnic the clintons would have with any other Republican candidate. no fight, no spunk, acquiesce.

and we’d all be angry all over again.


41 posted on 05/21/2016 7:04:50 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
"The Second Amendment is under a threat like never before," the former reality TV star said.

I love the biased description of Trump, like he's done nothing but a reality TV show. Did they ever call Obama "the former community organizer"?

42 posted on 05/21/2016 7:10:48 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Hillary Clinton Plans to Fire Back at Trump for NRA Remarks

Good. This will also serve to sharpen Donald Trump's debate skills on this critical issue. Hopefully his two sons will have him well prepared.

The Democrats can be shown for the overt gun-banners that they are. After all Hillary's husband was the one who passed the federal semi-auto ban, which was patently unconstitutional by any reasonable interpretation. And Hillary's already on record as opposing DC vs. Heller, which, of course, is tantamount to opposing an individual right to bear arms.

As long as the Democrats want to ban semi-autos, attack concealed/open carry, support backdoor registration, and in general erode the RKBA, they're going to consistency lose this debate.

We've had enough of the Democrats' Media-assisted, un-American, Tyrannical propaganda: let it be shown who are the Statist Authoritarians and who believes in fundamental human Rights.

Vote Trump!

43 posted on 05/21/2016 7:49:10 PM PDT by sargon (You're either with Trump, or you're with Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Does Hilary not know that neither she nor any other president or Supreme Court will have the power to expunge the 2nd? The second is front and center in our amendments because our founding fathers thought it was that important. I believe it would require a Constitutional convention to debate and vote the issue.


44 posted on 05/21/2016 7:54:13 PM PDT by ArmyTeach ( Videteco eos prius (See 'em first) Sculpin 191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Trump doesn’t have to “plan” to say anything because he says what he believes.

Cankles has to “plan” everything she says because she has no beliefs, just focus-group talking points.


45 posted on 05/21/2016 8:12:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("During a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Trump attacking Hillary on guns puts Hillary into a no win situation. If she defends the second amendment, she loses people on the left. If she attacks the 2nd, she loses people in the center. Trump is gaining the center and independents, his stand will gain more.

Listen carefully to Hillary's policy positions from now on. I believe she will keep her policies well left of center, instead of normally moving right after the convention. If a candidate moves toward the center from their own party, they figure they have their own voters locked up and enthusiastic, and they are reaching out to get independents. If she keeps to the left, it signals that she hasn't locked up even the democrats, and her election map has shrunk down to only the reliable blue states. She will spend the election season trying to build up enthusiasm within already solid democrat groups. This is what will signal a wave election for Trump.

46 posted on 05/21/2016 8:13:37 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Didn’t Chelsea say her mom was going to do away with people owning firearms?


47 posted on 05/21/2016 8:14:19 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Bring it, Bitch.


48 posted on 05/21/2016 8:39:43 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

“a position she has not taken.” ABC news covering Hillary’s fat ass.
Just a few days ago she talked about an Australian-type ‘buy back’. Already Been Chewed news.
Of course, sales are mandatory, so it’s pure OD confiscation going by another name, a euphemism: “buy-back”.
ABC and the MSM and Hitlery doing what they do best: lying.


49 posted on 05/21/2016 8:40:54 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Clinton Plans to Fire Back

And that -- In a nutshell -- is why she will get schlonged by Trump. Trump doesn't plan to fire back -- he FIRES back -- and forcefully so.

50 posted on 05/21/2016 9:12:05 PM PDT by rhinohunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Hey Hillary --

if you were really concerned about gun violence, why don't you start by disarming Muslims (Fort Hood, San Bernardino, East Coast Sniper?)

Oh, you can't ?

How about teenage blacks in downtown Chicago? (almost any weekend)

Oh, that's racist?

Oh, I know. How about Russia and China.

oh, wait...

51 posted on 05/21/2016 10:12:42 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Hillary Clinton Plans to Fire Back at Trump for NRA Remarks

Just as soon as she sobers up and has her handlers tell her what to say that might make sense.

52 posted on 05/21/2016 10:19:05 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

I recoil every-time I hear “common sense approach” or “gang of” anything in politics.


53 posted on 05/21/2016 10:46:46 PM PDT by Bubba Gump Shrimp (A Liberal is someone who cannot accept that there is a Law of Unintended Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
Trump attacking Hillary on guns puts Hillary into a no win situation.

Trump is very good at that.

54 posted on 05/21/2016 11:54:35 PM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Travon Martin Foundation barf alert. How many street thugs have “foundations” named after them?


55 posted on 05/22/2016 12:03:53 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
It's interesting that the MSM always inserts statements of support for Hillary in all their reporting. In the first paragraph, the “journolist” makes a statement countering Trump's statement - but presents no proof to back it up.
56 posted on 05/22/2016 12:17:01 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
One of the afternoon Fox shows tried to debunk Trump's claim. The best they could come up with was that a research agency said that she had never said the words about abolishing the 2nd Amendment "verbatim".

Fortunately they had a republican woman there to point out that word "verbatim" and to remind folks that she is for so much gun control that she would cripple the People's right to bear arms/ammo and that she had stated (when she thought she wasn't being taped) that the SCOTUS decision that the People have a fundamental right to bear arms (District of Columbia v. Heller) was wrong.

She's gonna have trouble backing out of that one - lots of Democrats like the Freedom to bear arms and defend themselves just as much as the rest of us.

57 posted on 05/22/2016 4:06:12 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

“...fire back...”? That sounds violent. Maybe even a potential hate crime.


58 posted on 05/22/2016 8:05:08 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

What...huma’s nether regions have been “researched, focus-grouped and rehearsed”???


59 posted on 05/22/2016 8:11:20 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drewh

hillary goes to honor a SCUMBAG.... birds of a feather
the thug got was coming to him..... good riddance
the libtards have done NOTHING but stir up racial hate.....


60 posted on 05/22/2016 8:31:11 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson