Posted on 04/29/2016 8:23:32 PM PDT by combat_boots
From October 2013 forward we have discussed the presidential election of 2016 and foretold/warned what was to come. There are trillions of dollars at stake.
The culmination of four years strategic planning (2011 – 2015) from Wall Street -via legislative priorities- are enmeshed within the outcome. The financiers have spent hundreds of millions on the construction.
Anyone with even moderate research skills could assemble the same data if they had: a.) time, and b.) inclination. Sometimes, like the “splitter strategy“, conspiracies are not theory. The behavior inherent within the visible activity is simply just an outcome of a mutually beneficial plan.
There are trillions of dollars at stake. The financial (Wall Street) bets on the international global trade and finance sectors are in the tens of trillions. More modestly, the downstream beneficiaries within the campaign consulting industry itself are worth more than several billion per election cycle.
Candidate Donald Trump is a risk to all of these enterprises – All.Of.Them.
With that in mind everyone must ask themselves what would those interests, who ultimately control all of these outcomes, do to retain power? When there are trillions at stake, how much would they spend to retain control?
Think about it.
I don’t mean just casually consider it; I mean actually reset your mind and think about what would an enterprise do to retain control over even one trillion dollars.
Think about the math.
Contemplate the size and scope.
A billion seconds ago it was still 1959. How big is a trillion? (a thousand billions).
How big is the derivatives market? Derivatives are paper bets on global assets, trade, economic outcomes, etc.
How big are those ‘paper’ bets? $800 trillion? $1.4 quadrillion? No-one really knows.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
“The globalists are within sight of their goal. They will not go quietly.”
They have made a major error by declaring victory before they’ve won.
I’m going to the convention.
I’m also donating to his campaign and plan to volunteer knocking on doors and doing what I can to get him elected this fall.
I want to be able to say that I did my part as an American to try and save the Republic.
I was living in Hollywood when KRLA (or maybe KHJ) began playing the entire White Album before it was officially released. Before each track, a voice began describing the song and what was happening in the studio during the session.
That voice? George Harrison.
His “Piggies” song takes on a new meaning these daze...
Yeah it’s pretty much over. There’s only so much even Trump can do compared to what we’re up against.
Candidate Donald Trump is a risk to all of these enterprises – All.Of.Them.
I'm for Trump because I believe he's proposing common-sense solutions to the issues I deem most important-immigration, Islamic terror, and globalization. I disagree with Trump that tariffs and other punitive measures are the answer to jobs going off shore. I have followed Conservative Treehouse since the marvelous work Sundance did with the Zimmerman/Trayvon hoax. The statement from Sundance's article above I take issue with.
Even though he opposes TPP, I don't think Trump is a threat to the established order. Not the Wall-Street-DC-Brussels-Hong Kong alliance, and certainly not the Karl Roves of the world.
The person that would be a threat to all of the above would be running on a platform of term limits and elimination of the progressive income tax. Trump is doing neither, and I don't see that person anywhere.
It's the people voting for Trump that's the threat to the above interests. I have no delusions that Trump will fix everything, he's a step in a process that COULD end up with someone who would advocate, and credibly sell term limits, and the elimination of the progressive income tax. That's the person whose life will be in constant danger.
Even with Trump, it's going to be business as usual until these two things are dealt with. Sundance has been so right, on so much, but is over-rating Trump a bit, IMHO. We Trumpeters need to temper our expectations a bit, until he makes a move on term limits and the progressive income tax, I don't see it happening.
Because reversing deflation will mean Bishop Dullard's money, and Soros' money, and Hillary's money - is worth less. Some rich people clearly don't want that.
>>It’s anti-American. Pure and simple.
In the globalists’ minds, it is pro-American. But the catch is that their America is not OUR America.
They see America as a huge work force, educated just enough to be useful but not so much as to be dangerous. But, our workers want too much money for their labor. So, the globalist is forced to go to nations where labor is cheap enough, but the political structure of those nations are risky. Prior to Trump, they controlled American politics and the risk of rebellion was non-existent (no matter how much we talk about rising up and fighitng).
The plan was to lower our standard of living over a generation and when the Boomers die off and the Gen X’ers begin to retire, that’s when they strike and end the American dream for the hundreds of millions of “peasants”. Suddenly, they will all work for Chinese wages to be able to survive and the circle is closed.
So, how is this pro-America? Well, America is an idea and and ideal. They see all the Elites of the world living an American lifestyle while the 7 billion serfs toil below them.
In the globalist mind, America is not for those little people.
It is about Globalism v. (American) Nationalism.
When you cut to the core, that is what it is about; as well it should (and needs to) be.
"Two billion seconds ago it was still 1959. How big is a trillion? (a thousand billions)."
Very good points, thank you.
(Extrapolating backward the 32 year difference that your function yielded.)
Or perhaps just get back to his original meaning - as here (!) - without the creepy Manson factor that it unfairly had for awhile.
They are no different than the feudal lords of the middle ages.
They cannot exercise true power when they are fabulously wealthy and everyone else lives a decent lifestyle with no real wants. The true power comes when ordinary people have to scrabble for survival while the elitists live like kings.
Great article!
Thank you.
I believe this push and the money behind it translates into Trump hatred and opposition.
>>They are no different than the feudal lords of the middle ages.
Exactly. I tend to call Transnational Progressivism by the more useful term, Neofeudalism. It is not communism or even socialism, by the 20th century definition of the terms.
Wow...I agree with you 100%+. Thank you for writing that post. It gives me hope there is still someone left at FR who is thoughtful, cogent and wise.
"Two billion seconds ago it was still 1959.
Two billion seconds ago, HST had about five weeks left in office.
How big is a trillion? (a thousand billions).ruby -e "puts Time.at(Time.now - 2e9)" 1952-12-14 11:57:19 -0500
According to Google, a trillion seconds in years = 31709.7919837646 years.
(Do you like ruby?)
Ruby is unsurpassed for quick and dirty tasks, such as the current one.
For more serious work, I’d probably choose Python.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.