Posted on 04/12/2016 5:29:05 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
YOU WON’T BELIEVE THIS! CRUZ SUPPORTERS ATTEMPT COUP AT EAGLE FORUM!
Conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly has been a national leader of the conservative movement since the publication of her best-selling 1964 book, A Choice Not An Echo. She has been a leader of the pro-family movement since 1972 when she led the fight to defeat the Equal Rights Amendment.
Phyllis Schlafly is 91 years-old.
On March 11, 2016 conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly endorsed Donald Trump for President at his St. Louis rally.
But not everyone in her organization, Eagle Forum – or her family – agreed with Phyllis Schlafly’s decision.
Last week Phyllis Schlafly released several board members for disloyalty to the organization. The group was planning to hold rogue board meeting to take over the Eagle Forum.
Today the rogue Cruz supporters attempted a coup.
They held a non-sanctioned meeting and blocked Phyllis Schlafly from their conference call.
This email was sent out Monday afternoon.
St. Louis, Missouri:
“At 2pm today, 6 directors of Eagle Forum met in an improper, unprecedented telephone meeting. I objected to the meeting and at 2:11pm, I was muted from the call. The meeting was invalid under the Bylaws but the attendees purported to pass several motions to wrest control of the organization from me. They are attempting to seize access to our bank accounts, to terminate employees, and to install members of their own Gang of 6 to control the bank accounts and all of Eagle Forum.
“The members of their group are: Eunie Smith of Alabama, Anne Cori of Missouri, Cathie Adams of Texas, Rosina Kovar of Colorado, Shirley Curry of Tennessee, and Carolyn McLarty of Oklahoma.
“This kind of conduct will not stand and I will fight for Eagle Forum and I ask all men and women of good will to join me in this fight.”
This is a developing story—-
I did not say that. I said I did not hear them advocate for murder of any sort. And no.
Your opinion.
Nope. Reality.
How would anyone know ahead of time what crazy cultists are planning to do? People didn’t know Jim Jones was going to force all those people to drink cyanide kool aid before it happened now did they?
Oh I think they had a hint that they were murderers when they committed murder prior to that. But maybe that was not enough of a hint that the atheist Communists were murderers.
I’d say you following a cultist...
I see you jump to conclusions with no evidence. So you have confirmed that you are not only historically illiterate but logic challenged.
You have confirmed that you are not a person who should be taken seriously.
I think I’ll use any comparison I d@mn well please to. Do you think you can stop me?
Of course not. You may continue to make a fool of yourself in public as much as you wish.
When you see how quick Republican governors cave on ‘family values’ legislation like the NC governor did this afternoon, you scratch your head.
Then you realize the GOP is being controlled by the pro-LGBT anti-religious freedom forces of big business that also oppose Trump’s border restrictions and immigration restrictions because it hurts their cheap labor, open borders agenda.
Ted Cruz would be under their thumb in the end, too. The silence on religious freedom issues by the Cruz supporting talk show hosts like Beck is stunning, also.
We are between a rock and hard place.
If you repeat something enough times, it becomes the truth. They refer to "Lying Ted" because he has pointed out Donald Trump's record on such subjects as his support for partial birth abortion, the good works of Planned Parenthood and then claim Cruz is a liar because Donald Trump doesn't hold those positions "now." But can we really be sure that Donald Trump doesn't still hold those positions.
We certainly didn't trust Romney when he told all of us that he was "now" pro-life and that he was "now" a "severe conservative." We looked at his past and he was found wanting.
But people are willing to put their trust in Donald Trump, not because of a lifetime of support for conservative causes, but because he stuck his middle finger at the "establishment". But if one is honest, Donald Trump has spent his entire life cozying up to "the Establishment" and reaping the rewards of his contributions to such great americans as Nancy Pelosi, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid and Chuckie Schumer.
I'm not willing to give Trump any more benefit of the doubt than I was willing to give Romney or McCain. They pretended to be conservatives in order to get the nomination for president. Can we trust that Donald Trump is any different? What evidence do we have that he will continue to hold these new found conservative principles?
Hey, if you are going to criticize him for his faith, at least base it on what he has said - not on what someone else thinks he might believe based on what someone posted on some obscure blog...
Riiight...it didn't take 3 posts before a Trumpist went on a vile, nasty, mean-spirited rant against Cruz supporters in this very thread. Cruz supporters post reasonable, rational arguments. Trump supporters continuously spew some of the most vile insults I've ever seen outside of shock jock radio and Andrew Dice Clay's stand-up act.
This is what happens when your organization doesn't establish a clear hierarchy for executing the zot.
Oh? So the trains will run on time...
Fascism, is what's for dinner on FR lately.
I did no such thing. The question was directed at YOUR USE of the word 'seize'. You were the one describing Cruz's definition of the purpose of dominionism. It is your description - one which you apparently made up out of thin air since you are now unwilling to support it.
And I did read your linked post. There is nothing in there about seizing, confiscating, forcefully taking wealth belonging to sinners. You made it up.
Obscure blogs are the Trumpster news source of choice. Rumor-mongering and wild conspiracy theories are what fuels the magical thinking that would favor a Trump presidency.
The National Right to life has always been prolife. I was a counselor for a crisis pregnancy center and our material came from NRTL and Focus on the Family. Please show me there link where they have ever states abortion ok for anything but the life of the mother.
you’re an idiot who cares more about false accusations against Cruz than known truths about the Hillary supporter claiming to be a conservative.
so do most. I was wondering how many who work for her disagree with her on this one.
You’re nuts. Take me off your list.
no truth will work on strumpets, either, they are in a Biblical level of delusion
http://therightscoop.com/heres-a-great-video-that-debunks-trumpertantrums-screams-about-colorado/
When someone goes against the core beliefs
The National Right To Life did call themselves “pro-life” and argued with me when I told them they were not while they held that they were against abortion EXCEPT in the case of rape, incest and the life of the “mother”
Maybe they did change that later or when they had a new director etc, but that is not how they started out..
they started out with those exceptions...
Ditto ! And NO MORE HARVARD LAWYERS...enough already !
You were never on my list. Duh
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.