Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transportation Secretary: Inequitable Distribution of Sidewalks Is Obstacle to American Dream
cns news ^ | 3/31/16 | Eric Scheiner

Posted on 03/31/2016 9:34:38 AM PDT by Nachum

(CNSNews.com) - Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx told a crowd in North Carolina Tuesday that “only 49% of low-income neighborhoods have sidewalks” while more affluent areas have near 90%. In order to have a society where “everyone has a shot at the American Dream, than it’s imperative that we acknowledge these challenges.”

Foxx made the comments to the Charlotte Rotary Club where he discussed the ways that infrastructure should connect people to opportunity.

During his speech, Foxx referenced a map of Atlanta that showed areas of pedestrian and bicycle accidents. “The grey areas represent communities of concentrated poverty. This is representative of what’s occurring nationally, which is not surprising, because only 49% of low-income neighborhoods have sidewalks. In high-income areas the number is closer to 90%.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anthonyfoxx; bhodot; distribution; inequitable; infrastructure; liar; liberalagenda; secretary; sectrans; sidewalks; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: dfwgator

Looks lik George C Scott and Anthony Weiners love child.


41 posted on 03/31/2016 10:05:17 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (GOPe - Enriching the consultant class while selling out their constituents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

THANKS for posting...I was waiting for someone to also think
Monty Python (I don’t know how to post graphics/pictures)


42 posted on 03/31/2016 10:06:03 AM PDT by Mrs. B.S. Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: caltaxed

Which would those be? I’m just curious what communities you’re referring to.


43 posted on 03/31/2016 10:17:46 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I doubt this is correct.

Generally, cities that are hell holes...like Rochester NY have sidewalks. Few of the suburbs have sidewalks.

44 posted on 03/31/2016 10:21:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Everything is about race.


45 posted on 03/31/2016 10:24:40 AM PDT by The Mayor (Honesty means never having to look over your shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So I guess all other issues are solved.

Children and minorities hardest hit.


46 posted on 03/31/2016 10:28:12 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

No sidewalks? Where does it end?


47 posted on 03/31/2016 10:28:29 AM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Here in Minnesota homeowner is responsible for clearing snow from sidewalks in front of their home or be fined.


48 posted on 03/31/2016 10:36:29 AM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is nonsense, most upscale subdivisions don’t have or want sidewalks.


49 posted on 03/31/2016 10:40:37 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Ditto everything you said, plus the last six miles of my road is dirt, which I have to maintain.
I LOVE IT, KEEPS THE RIF RAF OUT.


50 posted on 03/31/2016 10:40:44 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: caltaxed

The most affluent areas in California don’t want sidewalks. It reduces their property value.


Same in Florida. Sidewalks only on bigger streets in new developments.


51 posted on 03/31/2016 10:47:24 AM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

There are already federal programs for Pedestrian and Bicycle access projects.

As a former City and County Engineer I was involved in compiling plans and studies to show “gaps” in sidewalks. This was part of the American with Disabilities Act.

The Transportation Secretary is comparing apples to oranges. A city or county is required to upgrade all sidewalks to current standards if any federal money is involved. But federal money can only be used on any functionally classified road, i.e., arterials and collectors, which in other words is typically the busiest roads and streets in the community. Residential neighborhood roads do not qualify. The only way to re-classify a road or street is through engineering analysis that must be approved by the State and Federal agency.

It is really up to the local community whether to have design standards that require all new development to install sidewalks, but the key word there is NEW. No consideration is given to older neighborhoods that don’t have sidewalks, again because of the road classification. The only way that I know how for an agency to rebuild road ands streets to new standards is if the neighborhood forms a Local Improvement District whereby they agree to raise their own property taxes to pay for the improvements. This LIS cost can be shared equally or apportioned based upon road frontage and the homeowner has 12 years to pay it off on their annual property tax bill.


52 posted on 03/31/2016 10:48:17 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah! If Ferguson had sidewalks, Michael Brown wouldn’t have had to walk in the middle of the street and get the cops on him!


53 posted on 03/31/2016 10:58:53 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Doesn’t the Transportation Secretary have better things to do with his time? Looks like another federal make work program where he will get a bit of a kickback.


54 posted on 03/31/2016 10:59:27 AM PDT by Texas resident (Democrats=CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That must be why they built sidewalks on both sides of the road, going nowhere, in Sumatra, FL. Less than 100 live there and nobody walks.


55 posted on 03/31/2016 10:59:36 AM PDT by jch10 (Hillary in the Big House, not the White House .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jch10

“Nobody walks in LA”


56 posted on 03/31/2016 11:00:08 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
This is nonsense, most upscale subdivisions don’t have or want sidewalks.,

Same in our town. The old part of the town, where I live, has sidewalks. I'm responsible for upkeep of those in front of my house. The "upscale" section of town doesn't have sidewalks. There's a park across the street. No sidewalks there.

57 posted on 03/31/2016 11:40:14 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yes, it is as crazy as a “mineshaft gap!” Great movie and I say so. (:>)) Bat


58 posted on 03/31/2016 11:41:50 AM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

I guess million would be more accurate. Fifty intersections were modified (two curb sections removed at each intersection) and the sidewalk paved into a ramp shape. Each modification cost around $10,000 each including labor. So a total of 100 modifications resulting in around a million dollars.


59 posted on 03/31/2016 11:43:21 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Foxx has now proved his IQ is below today’s date. 31


60 posted on 03/31/2016 11:43:46 AM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson