Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Times columnist fired after confirming 2 of the now 8 Cruz mistresses [should be 5]
Examiner.com ^ | March 26, 2016 | Lori Stacey

Posted on 03/27/2016 2:14:11 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater

After the Washington Times quickly disassociated from him "for saying a scandal may be true", Johnson seemed to still be a class act. He tweeted that he respected them and had enjoyed working with them. He did not understand though why they would do this via Twitter instead of a phone call or even an email.

However, now there are attempts to smear and discredit him, claiming they have not had a relationship with him in over a year which he soon replied to providing proof of being paid just last month.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California; US: New York; US: Texas; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016election; california; canuckmountie; carlyfiorina; cruz; cruzsexscandal; dirtyteddy; drewjohnson; election2016; garyhart; goldmansachs; heidicruz; johnedwards; johnkasich; mountie; nationalenquirer; newyork; ohcanada; ohio; sarahisgurflores; schlonged; sexscandal; tedcruz; texas; trump; washingtontimes; washtimesreporter; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
Interesting, except the title should have said only 5 mistresses because Bill Still now retracts the story from:

Still Report # 736 - Enquirer: 3 More Cruz Babes
    "Still Report # 737 - Mistakes Made on the Cruz Sex Scandal Story"

1 posted on 03/27/2016 2:14:12 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

2 posted on 03/27/2016 2:21:47 AM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

Bill Clinton’s back!


3 posted on 03/27/2016 2:23:51 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

He didn’t “confirm.” He sent a tweet. Confirmation requires evidence. And calling the guy a “writer” is intended imply that he was a reporter. But he wrote opinion pieces on topics such as government waste.


4 posted on 03/27/2016 2:29:26 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Trump should hire him.


5 posted on 03/27/2016 2:42:31 AM PDT by McGruff (Ted. You got some esplainin to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

A suspicious person might think the GOP was holding this to release in order to knock Cruz out after he had won the caucuses where his organization gave him a good chance to win. Now there are a bunch of elections in northern states where they want Kasich to be the only alternative to Trump. Of course that would mean they were only using Trump to get an open convention so they could foist someone other than Trump or Cruz on us. Nah, that’s just paranoid.


6 posted on 03/27/2016 2:44:33 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Above should read “only using Cruz”, not Trump. It’s late.


7 posted on 03/27/2016 2:45:44 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
As I told another FREEPER, that was the plan all along and why the GOPe has been totally comfortable supporting Cruz as their tool to force a Contested Convention. They had two reasons - (1) Cruz was the only person who could, at whatever level, compete against Trump and (2) at a Contested Convention, they could then release detailed information on the (alleged) affairs and use that to take Cruz out of the running. Consequently, they could then put a third person that is neither Trump nor Cruz.

In a nutshell, this is why the GOPe were totally comfortable supporting Cruz. They had a poison pill prepared.

No matter what Romney and Bush might say, there was no way they'd support Cruz all the way. They always planned on having someone else get selected at a Brokered Convention, and thus the story was meant to come out the moment it was for certain that Trump had not breached the minimum cutoff.

For that matter, the GOPe would probably have blamed the leak on a sour Trump.

8 posted on 03/27/2016 3:38:45 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

Trump and Cruz have to combine forces. But chances of that happening? LOL.


9 posted on 03/27/2016 3:45:22 AM PDT by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

You are the second Freeper to suggest this ( could be the first and I only read you second).

There is more supporting (but not 100% damning) evidence today from a writer who said Heidi insisted on only male staffers. So there!

We know Ted’s not gay.


10 posted on 03/27/2016 3:55:17 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Shouldn't that be "Mooove Along"?
11 posted on 03/27/2016 3:56:24 AM PDT by shibumi (Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
In a nutshell, this is why the GOPe were totally comfortable supporting Cruz. They had a poison pill prepared.

Agreed. It still hasn't dawned on the "off the charts brilliant" guy in the room that he's been played for the patsy. The establishment snickers behind his back all the while. Such a tool!

12 posted on 03/27/2016 4:00:29 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Trump <s>Cruz</s> or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

I think Cruz never had a chance at a first round win and the GOPe never needed a poison pill.

The Cruz missal thwarts their plan to siphon delegates from Trump, does not advance it. Re-think your conspiracy theory.


13 posted on 03/27/2016 4:03:24 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater
After the Washington Times quickly disassociated from him "for saying a scandal may be true"

Well, no doubt now!

14 posted on 03/27/2016 4:07:07 AM PDT by Mr Apple ( HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anton
I think Cruz never had a chance at a first round win and the GOPe never needed a poison pill.

Rethink your own conspiracy theory. If Trump is denied on the first round, then the delegates are free to vote for whomever. It won't be Cruz. Cruz served his purpose which was to deny Trump a first round victory and open the convention to the machinations of the GOPe.

The candidate will be romney, or kasich, or ryan. They may even drag jeb! back in.

15 posted on 03/27/2016 4:09:55 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Trump <s>Cruz</s> or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Uh, did you read my post? That is what I said.


16 posted on 03/27/2016 4:13:41 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LS

Wow, that’s some very strong support, at least for me. I’ll have to look for that one.


17 posted on 03/27/2016 4:14:15 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

If you do find that quote, please post a link here. I’d really like to read more about it.


18 posted on 03/27/2016 4:19:37 AM PDT by rissole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rissole; LS

A lone tweet by an Atlanta talk radio guy seems to be it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3414281/posts

Hopefully more will come out on this, one way or the other.


19 posted on 03/27/2016 4:25:00 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

yep


20 posted on 03/27/2016 4:27:24 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson