Posted on 02/14/2016 5:19:18 AM PST by DeathBeforeDishonor1
A CIA secret weapon used for assassination shoots a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, as explained in Congressional testimony in the video. The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin. On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all. The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target. The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes. Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony. The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries of the Church Committee hearings, officially known as the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence activities.
(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...
I independently came up with the same connection, but there are two John Poindexters. The ranch owner is not the admiral who defended drug and gun running to fund the contras.
Thanks.
See post 142.
Of course it’s a possibility, but we have to admit, 79 year olds die!
...
They do, but Scalia is a very public figure with a large family, and he dies in a room by himself in the middle of nowhere. Then there is no autopsy.
Clancy did his research, and had access to places many of us will never go.
They don’t like him because he isn’t on board with selling the USA down the river. Everyone in the boat get p.o.’ed at the one guy who paddles in the other direction.
Clancy died, too, under 0bama, IIRC.
So let me get this right. Cruz tried to sell the USA down the river but the GOPe overcame his efforts and instead gave Obama everything he’s ever wanted? They are mad at Cruz because he tried to sell America down the river by not giving Obama everything he wanted like they were doing?
And instead of annoying the people who gave Obama everything he wanted, Trump made donations to the democrats as the “cost of doing business” but will turn the corruption around because he is an “outsider”?
Look, I don’t know who I’m going to vote for, but the logic used here so often fails to make any sense.
Ted Cruz was the only person fighting seriously, and most “conservatives” chose not to fight alongside him because they didn’t want to make waves with the GOPe leadership and lose committee appointments.
Trump was the only person who publicly questioned Obama as ineligible.
They each have their strengths and weaknesses and that’s why it’s hard to decide who to support.
The people who have done NOTHING BUT HURT US are the ones who refused to fight for us because, they claim, they just don’t like Ted Cruz. And Trump is supposed to be preferable because he will be greasy enough that they will like him. I’m sorry, but that’s just a crappy way of trying to fix the corruption in DC, by rewarding the people who care nothing about their oaths of office.
I was blasted by my entire family for being suspicious of scalis death now i almost feel vindicated.
Diagnosis: "Delusional Parasitosis", referred for mental health workup...
It only took you two tries to get it right, well almost. Obama and most of the rest of the 'crew' are rowing one way, Cruz, the other.
The meme is that supposedly Cruz is no good because "he can't get along", but looking at who he doesn't get along with, I'd say that is a plus, not the alleged negative so many posters here try to make it out to be.
We have 95+ Obama ass kissers in the Senate depending on the issue or the day, maybe more, and if Cruz doesn't get along with them I would accept that as a fine recommendation for Cruz.
I am not real happy with the rest of them.
Trump was the only person who publicly questioned Obama as ineligible.
Huh?
Orly, Arpaio, just about half the Conservative internet, what are we, chopped liver?
The Obamites even called us "Birthers". We were mentioned as such on teevee.
Trump may be the richest one to publicly mention it, but definitely not the only one. I lost count of how many lawsuits questioning Obama's eligibility were dismissed for 'lack of standing', but there was a pile of them.
I have other reasons for not wanting to vote for Trump, which I have articulated elsewhere on this forum, among which the cognitive disconnect involved in keeping the EPA going whole hog (Statement made while pandering to the Ethanol Lobby in Iowa) and "Making America Great Again", considering the EPA has done more to destroy American Industry and move it offshore than any other agency or action of any government or by hostile forces in the history of this country. That was the deal breaker for me.
Is that what you’re saying the Obama computer screen would tell them to diagnose?
It’s actually a very serious situation, to have the Obama regime telling doctors what to do. This person’s colleague was illegally detained on trumped-up charges of being dangerous, and then while detained had his meds withheld creating a critical situation which they then called mental illness. He only escaped their clutches because he had colon cancer and had to have treatment.
The father and daughter exhibited symptoms shortly after an online post threatened that the father would have to lose his job if his wife didn’t stop presenting evidence regarding a very visible incident which (though not yet exposed) is now known to include multi-agency crimes to cover up probably the most serious issue this nation has ever faced. The wife didn’t get that message though, because the person who made the threat also hacked the blog administration so that post notifications were not sent out, and that particular threat was not known until after it was too late.
A previous attempt to kill the husband through a car explosion had been unsuccessful.
These crooks mean business. Those who have fought them know it from first-hand experience.
I personally put nothing past them. NOTHING.
OK, looks like we’re on the same page then. The whole claim that Cruz is an insider, and yet that he cant’ get anything done because his fellow Senators (who sold us down the river) hate him.... is so convoluted there’s no way to make it a credible claim. And yet it gets used here all the time. sigh.
Trump was the only high-profile person who would address Obama’s ineligibility and fraud, as opposed to the Congress-critters (including Cruz) who didn’t want to touch it. That’s one of the things that makes me sad about Cruz, and one of the strengths of Trump. Yes, we little people fought but nobody who valued their “reputation” or “credibility” was willing to touch it. Trump was just honest about it and took a lot of heat for it. The guy is no lily-livered sellout to PC, and that’s why he is seen as a ray of hope in the current situation.
Well that right there is just a big fat coincidence. Obama shaking hands with the last guy to see Scalia alive.
And Poindexter’s statement to reporters at the link is tantamount to an admission that something’s amiss.
Poindexter claims he went—alone—to Scalia’s room at 8:30 am, and claims the door was locked. He implies, but doesn’t actually say, that he knocked, and went away after getting no answer. (But Poindexter is the owner. He’d have a master key. So he could have entered the room at this time, or at any time during the wee hours.) So at 8:30 am Poindexter, after ostensibly walking away from Scalia’s locked door, then went on an “outing” and came back at 11 am. At this time he decides to use his key to enter the room, where he finds Scalia’s body cold.
He then calls for help and ASKS if he should attempt resuscitation!! He implies that he would have attempted to revive an already cold corpse (out of an abundance of respect and concern, presumably, for Mr. Scalia) but only reluctantly agreed not to try, after consulting with other people?!?
This is a guy who served in combat in Vietnam?!?
There are holes in this story big enough to drive a truck through.
There’s that too, and in my mind, more worth looking into.
Really? He could see this in the dark?
Maxwell Smart had better toys..!!
Excuse me, what is that man doing wearing service ribbons with civvies??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
