Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grassley: Wait until election is over to fill Scalia's vacancy (Senate Judiciary Chairman)
Hill ^ | 13 February 2016 | Lydia Wheeler

Posted on 02/13/2016 4:48:17 PM PST by Red Steel

Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) echoed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) calls to wait for a new president to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia.

In a statement Saturday night, Grassley said it's been standard practice over the last 80 years not to confirm a Supreme Court nominee during a presidential election year.

"Given the huge divide in the country, and the fact that this President, above all others, has made no bones about his goal to use the courts to circumvent Congress and push through his own agenda, it only makes sense that we defer to the American people who will elect a new president to select the next Supreme Court Justice," he said.

Grassley's statement falls in line with that of McConnell, who said Scalia should not be replaced until after the 2016 presidential election.

"The American people‎ should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice," he said in a statement.

In his remarks, Grassley called Scalia, who died Saturday at the age of 79, "an intellectual giant."

"He had an unwavering dedication to the founding document that has guided our country for nearly 230 years," he said of Scalia's interpretation of the Constitution. "His humor, devotion to the Constitution and quick wit will be remembered for years to come."


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Iowa; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: antoninscalia; chuckgrassley; iowa; kentucky; mitchmcconnell; obituaries; obituary; scalia; scotus; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Red Steel

Worrisome ...

http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/members


21 posted on 02/13/2016 5:57:04 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

It takes 2/3rds of the Senate to confirm.

Get it? That means the national socialists would have to have at least 14? Republicans to vote for their choice.


22 posted on 02/13/2016 6:06:28 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


23 posted on 02/13/2016 6:12:09 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

Obama will wait until after the election and nominate a big lefty commie on Wednesday after tthe election. McConnell will rush it thru on Jan 19th at 4AM, where it will clear by one vote attached to huge package of payouts.


24 posted on 02/13/2016 6:15:57 PM PST by BRK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I will send Grassley a phone and a pen - maybe go head-to-head with Barry’s phone and pen.


25 posted on 02/13/2016 6:55:05 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


26 posted on 02/13/2016 7:09:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Looks like the GOP is just saying no. bout dang time,


27 posted on 02/13/2016 7:43:55 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

McConnell might not be serious, but I guarantee Grassley is. No nomination goes forward unless McConnell removes Grassley as Judiciary Committee chair.


28 posted on 02/13/2016 8:13:48 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

BTTT!


29 posted on 02/13/2016 8:23:32 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

“Good for McConnell and Grassley. We have to have their backs on this. The Republic is at stake.”

I will have the GOPe boys backs on this if they hold firm and don’t allow a vote.

Also, if the Republican nominee (Trump?) is smart he can use this his advantage. I am willing to bet at least half the country is scared right now the 0bama will get to stack this court with another 0bamunist.


30 posted on 02/13/2016 10:02:41 PM PST by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

“McConnell might not be serious, but I guarantee Grassley is.”

You think Grassley will hold firm? I hope so!


31 posted on 02/13/2016 10:03:39 PM PST by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson