Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Plan Cuts Taxes for Millions
wsj.com ^ | Sept. 28, 2015

Posted on 09/28/2015 8:18:50 AM PDT by Helicondelta

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump plans to unveil an ambitious tax plan Monday that he says would eliminate income taxes for millions of households, lower the tax rate on all businesses to 15% and change tax treatment of companies’ overseas earnings.

Under the Trump plan, no federal income tax would be levied against individuals earning less than $25,000 and married couples earning less than $50,000. The Trump campaign estimates that would reduce taxes to zero for 31 million households that currently pay at least some income tax. The highest individual income-tax rate would be 25%, compared with the current 39.6% rate.

Many middle-income households would have a lower tax rate under Mr. Trump’s proposal, but because high-income households generally pay income tax at much higher rates, his proposed across-the-board rate cut could have a positive impact on them, too. For example, an analysis of Jeb Bush’s plan—taxing individuals’ incomes at no more than 28%—by the business-backed Tax Foundation found that the biggest percentage winners in after-tax income would be the top 1% of earners.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; grovernorquist; newyork; taxcut; taxcuts; taxreform; trump; trumptaxplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-278 next last
To: RoosterRedux
How did he increase taxes on millionaires?

Exactly, why would hedge fund guys hate this plan?

101 posted on 09/28/2015 9:19:26 AM PDT by austingirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
Today, 36% of American households today pay no income taxes, and that number would grow to 50%.

Less people with skin in the game. I thought conservatives wanted everyone to pay at least a little so they felt more ownership when the government wastes their money.

102 posted on 09/28/2015 9:20:30 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD; WENDLE
Our marginal tax rate is close to 50% and we have absolutely no tax shelters. If your income is all earned wages, there are no shelters.

Currently, unlike other businesses doctors have very little options to reduce taxes. The main option is a deferral of taxes through contributions to retirement plans. As a tax shelter it is just a "pay later" rather than now option. In our current environment it is possible that DR's and other professionals will pay more on income deferred if congress keeps raising rates.

103 posted on 09/28/2015 9:21:15 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Middle America has been economically gang banged for decades, and used and a GD punching bag as their standard of living declined while the rich got richer.

The IRS are hired guns and are only there to force their political will and loot Americas. IRS need to be the first to be eliminated.


104 posted on 09/28/2015 9:21:29 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

God bless my Sen Cruz....he might do best with saying flat tax, over saying abolish the IRS....

Who here wouldn’t love to see the IRS eliminated, or, at the very least emasculated? But, folks like my older aunts/uncles think that’s crazy talk. They’re in the Snarly Carly camp, for now, so there’s that :)

I think Trump’s goal is to move the realistic mountain, so to speak...not just throw the red meat. Speaking of red meat, is Cruz also going to also abolish SS? Just saying.

From your link....

The fiery rhetoric garners hearty applause from conservative audiences, particularly since revelations in 2013 that the IRS targeted Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny. But some federal agency is going to have to collect taxes, so Cruz’s vow to shutter the IRS smacks of a politically motivated campaign promise rather than serious policy — at least to some.

“We will roll it out with precise details in the coming weeks or months,” he said. “There are trade-offs to be had and we’re right now internally having those debates, in terms of whether you have a couple of deductions or exemptions or not, at what rate the flat rate is set, what level of standard deductions and so those trade-offs we’re currently debating.”


This was from April, of this year. Has Cruz “rolled out the precise details” of his plan, yet? TMIA.


105 posted on 09/28/2015 9:21:43 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"only Trump has detailed positions on his website. Yet it is Trump who is being criticized for "not having details."

Exactly!

106 posted on 09/28/2015 9:21:55 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

I have no interest in any tax plan that allows more people to pay nothing while the rich pay more.

That is right out of the Democratic play book.

And dont try to trick me into believing this is a tax cut for everyone. If millions more are paying NOTHING, that means that still paying have to be paying more if you want to take in the same amount of revenue.

This is just a tricky way of saying what Democrats always say about taxes.

TAX THE RICH MORE!


107 posted on 09/28/2015 9:22:34 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
It's not so much about increasing taxes on millionaires but removing the loopholes and tax shelters that allow them to skate out on their obligations. Even Trump admits to paying tax lawyers to minimize his taxes. What prudent businessman wouldn't take advantage of exploiting a flawed and overly complicated tax code?

Trump wants to take all those ways and impose what is essentially a flat tax for all.

108 posted on 09/28/2015 9:22:44 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (A businessman gets things done with own money. A politician takes money and gets nothing done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
IRS need to be the first to be eliminated.

We would have to eliminate the Federal Government first. IRS collects and enforces all federal taxes. Even with a flat tax we need someone to clear our checks.

109 posted on 09/28/2015 9:24:44 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Sounds like it is still a progressive TAX and the IRS is still in control.

No thanks


110 posted on 09/28/2015 9:25:13 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

We end up subsidizing up through the middle income level as it is currently. Far better to let them keep more or all of their income and reduce subsidies than to discourage work by taxing it, even though we subsidize them elsewhere.

The way I’m seeing Trump’s plan at first glance is that the reduction in corporate taxes and business-only taxing of small businesses and contractors will give a significant boost to the economy.

Eliminating taxes up to the middle class will help to get the buy in needed to get the corporate reductions passed and into law.

He does talk about reducing spending as key to his plan as well.


111 posted on 09/28/2015 9:26:21 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: austingirl

I like freedom.

Why should the government control what I buy?

Your idea is what causes government to keep growing while freedom keeps on dying.

Limited government desperately needs to return; it cannot do so with any kind of consumption tax.
.


112 posted on 09/28/2015 9:26:55 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
thought conservatives wanted everyone to pay at least a little so they felt more ownership when the government wastes their money.

When the other side of the ledger is going to get chopped big time. The extra waste by government that Trump plans to cut, it turns this hackneyed argument into agitprop.

113 posted on 09/28/2015 9:27:19 AM PDT by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN; SamAdams76
Controlling corrupt government/MSM and those connected to government payroll have been lying to us and loot middle America for decades.

And these same AH's attack Trump on an hourly basis? ☺ He catching their flack because he's over their filthy corrupt camps.

114 posted on 09/28/2015 9:27:28 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

They’ve already got skin in the game in payroll, sales, state, and other taxes.

Just looking at their tax situation with the federal government, however. Better to trade subsidies for lower or eliminated tax rates, as high subsidies and high taxes give double incentives for people not to work.

It looks like Trump’s plan is meant to encourage people both to work and to be hired in an invigorated economy.


115 posted on 09/28/2015 9:28:20 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: austingirl
Well the hedge fund guys will dislike this plan because it eliminates what is called "carried interest" which basically let's them treat their income as long-term capital gains instead of ordinary income and they pay a lower rate of 20% instead of the current maximum rates for ordinary income of 39.6%.

Essentially this plan would increase there tax rate from 20% to 25% (the new maximum tax rate on ordinary income).

116 posted on 09/28/2015 9:29:22 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Trump: As long as you are going to be thinking anyway, think big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

So which tax is required for voting rights? Sales taxes from fueling up a car? Taxes on a cell phone bill? The taxes that every consumer pays when they buy a product - not the sales taxes at the counter, but the taxes the company who made the product pays? As that’s included in the price of the item.

It is extremely difficult to get through a single day without paying taxes in some form or another. I’m curious as to who exactly you’d exclude?


117 posted on 09/28/2015 9:30:59 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
while the rich pay more

The current maximum tax rate on ordinary income is 39.6%. Trump's plan cuts that to 25%.

That's a pretty significant cut for the rich.

118 posted on 09/28/2015 9:31:48 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Trump: As long as you are going to be thinking anyway, think big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
“Definitely. Anyone who doesn’t chip in via taxes should not have a vote. They have no right to provide input as to how government money should be spent.”

Every American citizen can vote for his/her representatives in govn. from the president down to their county representatives. They are voting for people, not about how govn. spends money. Many years ago, people had to pay a poll tax to vote and that was rescinded as unconstitutional.

Plus, if voting rights were related to the amount of money people make, these people who make smaller money amounts who wouldn't pay taxes, would be captive people - their voting rights would be taken from them due to no fault of their own. That would be unconstitutional.

119 posted on 09/28/2015 9:32:11 AM PDT by Marcella (CRUZ (Prepping can save you life today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Well the hedge fund guys will dislike this plan

If i were a hedge fund guy I would love this plan. Their income comes from after tax business profits. If the businesses they control have lower tax and our more competitive in world markets then the hedge fund guys will have higher income and stock prices go up. Its an overall win.

120 posted on 09/28/2015 9:32:33 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson