Posted on 09/25/2015 5:53:26 PM PDT by markomalley
First it was f---king Jews. Now Ann Coulter has turned her attention to Catholics.
In response to a tweet from David Limbaugh who spoke in agreement with Catholics who object to Pope Franciss economic critique, Coulter tweeted, Im an American and this is why our founders (not immigrants!) distrusted Catholics & wouldnt make them citizens.
Some might argue that she is merely being sarcastic. Please forgive me if I fail to see the sarcasm of f---king Jews. But if her comments about Catholics were an attempt at sarcasm, it might be useful if she attempted to demonstrate a rudimentary knowledge of American history.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Who listens to this woman ?
Just look at the stats. Catholics are too liberal compared to other Christians. And unlike the Jews, they can’t blame emigration to Israel for thinning out their conservative ranks. It’s part of their tradition.
And I’m Catholic and went to Catholic school. Way too many of those Catholic school alumni are raging liberals today as adults.
Coulter’s onto something.
She’s a moron.
Restrictions on Catholic immigration was lifted before 1800 (Less than 20 years after we gained our independence)
Yep. She’s the ‘trolliest of the trolls’.
Me same same, agree 10,000%
Why in hell are so many Irish and Latin American priests freaking commies FROM HELL...?
Ann is right again, about EVERYTHING in the world except Romney.
ANN IS RIGHT.
At the end of the day, she collects her paycheck from either gullible conseratives or liberal Republicans, brags about how witty and Swiftian she [thinks she] is, and then lets her good buddy Bill Maher do his liberal spiel to her.
She is no conservative.
I think the question she is trying to raise is "should it have been"? And, perhaps, "is there any way to reverse that policy"?
A CHART SHOWING PROPHECIES OF REIGN OF GENTILE KINGDOMS | ||||||||
Dan. 2 The IMAGE |
Daniel 7 The FOUR BEASTS (State) (Church) |
Dan. 8 The RAM and GOAT |
Revelation 13 The BEAST and IMAGE (State) (Church) |
Rev. 17 BABYLON and BEAST |
EXPLANA- TION of Symbols |
The EVENTS Fulfilled in HISTORY |
||
Head of GOLD v. 32, 38 |
1st BEAST like LION v. 4 |
1st HEAD of prophetic BABYLON |
The CHALDEAN EMPIRE (Babylon) 625-539 B.C. |
|||||
Breast and arms of SILVER v. 32, 39 |
2nd BEAST (BEAR) v. 5 |
RAM with 2 horns v. 3, 4, 20 |
2nd HEAD of prophetic BABYLON |
The PERSIAN EMPIRE (Medo-Persia) 558-330 B.C. |
||||
Belly and thighs of BRASS v. 32, 39 |
3rd BEAST (LEOPARD) 4 heads v. 6 |
HE GOAT with great horn and 4 notable ones v. 5-8, 21, 22 |
3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th HEADS of prophetic BABYLON |
GREECE, under Alexander the Great, and four divisions, began 333 B.C. |
||||
Legs as IRON v. 33, 40-43 |
4th BEAST strong like IRON with 10 HORNS v. 7, 23, 24 |
The BEAST with 7 HEADS and 10 HORNS v. 1, 2 |
7th HEAD of prophetic BABYLON, with ten HORNS |
The ROMAN EMPIRE, 31 B.C.-A.D. 476, in 2 divisions, West and East |
||||
The DEADLY WOUND v. 3 |
Fall of the ROMAN EMPIRE A.D. 476 |
|||||||
1st HORN (plucked by roots) |
1st HORN | These three horns, destroyed at behest of Pope, fill the Transition Age (Myers) |
The VANDALS A.D. 429-533 |
|||||
2nd HORN (rooted up) |
2nd HORN | The HERULI Odoacers government, A.D. 476-493 |
||||||
3rd HORN (rooted up) |
3rd HORN | The OSTROGOTHS A.D. 493-554 |
||||||
LITTLE HORN among ten v. 8, 20-22, 24-27 |
2 horned LAMB DRAGON and IMAGE v. 11-18 |
SCARLET WOMAN who rode the BEAST v. 1, 2 |
Ruled the beast, so called BABYLON the GREAT |
FALSE CHRISTIANITY and church government, or image of Roman Empire government |
||||
4th HORN |
1st of remaining 7 horns DEADLY WOUND HEALED (to continue 1260 years) v. 5 |
1st HEAD of BEAST (healed) ridden by scarlet- clothed woman |
Since the Great Whore never rode any of the 7 heads of the 1st 4 beasts, but did mount and ride the last 7 horns of Daniels 4th beast it follows that the last 7 horns of Dan. 7 and Rev. 13 are the 7 HEADS of Rev. 17 (5 fallen at collapse of Napoleon). |
IMPERIAL RESTORATION of empire by Justinian, A.D. 554. He recognized supremacy of this worlds Christianity. |
||||
5th HORN |
2nd of remaining 7 HORNS |
2nd HEAD ridden by woman |
FRANKISH KINGDOM Began 774. Charlemagne crowned A.D. 800 |
|||||
6th HORN |
3rd of remaining 7 HORNS |
3rd HEAD ridden by woman |
HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE (German head). Otto the Great crowned, 962. |
|||||
7th HORN |
4th of remaining 7 HORNS |
4th HEAD ridden by woman |
HAPSBURG dynasty (Austrian head), Charles V crowned, 1520. |
|||||
8th HORN |
5th of remaining 7 HORNS |
5th HEAD ridden by woman |
NAPOLEONS KINGDOM (French head), crowned, 1805. |
|||||
In 1814, just 1260 years after deadly wound was healed, the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE was dissolved. So closed a government that dated from Augustus Caesar (West, p. 377). |
||||||||
9th HORN |
6th of remaining 7 HORNS |
6th HEAD ridden by woman |
(One IS) Rev. 17:10 |
ITALY, united by Garibaldi, 1870 to 1945 |
||||
The Ten TOES |
10th HORN |
7th and last HORN |
Beast ascends out of pit |
7th head and ten HORNS |
(One yet to come) |
Revived ROMAN EMPIRE, by 10 rulers under one leader. |
I believe Castro was studying to be a Jesuit at one time too.
I think the current far far far left Pope was a Jesuit too?
The Catholic Church is a haven for the far left for some odd reason.
But Ann's cheap shot at Catholic is lame .
The "f%$king jews" comment comes DIRECTLY from Hillary saying it to Dick Morris.
And when she got into trouble for calling John Edwards a "faggot", she was simply repeating what a black actor said to another actor and got fired over it.
The MSM squeals much, but they often just look for a cheap shot, and don't realize that Ann is mocking them.
The media is savvy enough to realize that their basic audience has an IQ of 70.
Intelligent people "got" why she said those things.
Unfortunately very few people have the brain power to understand her sarcasm, so they just simply buy into some "Ann Coulter is mean" meme.
Coulter overestimates people's comprehension all the time.
Maybe that is her weakness.
She assumes that there is intelligent life out there in America.
Alas, there is a vanishingly small amount of it.
But I get why she said it.
I was born and raised Catholic. As was my wife.
We attended a Catholic church after we got married, but eventually we left. The priest, a very nice man, gave us very little in the way of the Bible, but a LOT in the way of leftist nonsense.
His homilies contained subjects like the death penalty (it's bad!).
But pro-life? Never.
He initially had petitions against same-sex marriage, but the next week he removed them, but never told us why.
I am CERTAIN that some "Good Catholics" told him that they wouldn't come to the church anymore if he did that.
So he folded like a cheap tent.
If I wanted to listen to some squish drone on about leftist causes and continuously ask for money, I can go to some Episcopalian church down the road.
I believe that by “founders”, she refers to the Pilgrims, and she’s correct. They despised the pope and all things Catholic. Wouldn’t even celebrate Christmas (Christmas), as it was a mass instigated by Catholics — so they believed.
During the colonial era, Maryland was founded by a Catholic, Lord Baltimore, but Catholics there later lost the right to hold office and it was illegal to have Catholic schools. Charles Carroll of Carrollton, who signed the Declaration of Independence, had no political rights as long as Maryland was a colony, but could vote and hold office once Maryland rebelled against the crown.
Catholic military officers from France and Poland contributed to the Continental Army.
It was against the law in early Massachusetts to observe Christmas—unless it fell on a Sunday you were supposed to work. The Puritans also didn’t have much use for mainstream Anglicans or for Quakers.
Most assuredly he is...this was discussed when he was chosen.
He is also a Argentine....that should close any debate as to where his politics are.
The first reformers were critical of Roman Catholics definitely.
They believed the papacy was the seat of antichrist and the popes ‘antichrist’..
Pilgrims, puritans, whatever carried with them what would be considered an anti Rome Bible today, called the Geneva Bible. Came before the King James.
And amazingly, scripture would call rabinic Judaism ‘’antichrist’ too..so is Islam..
Ann swerves into something that was known 500 years ago during the reformation.
What would a protestant daughter do if everything they thought they knew turned out to be just a Roman lie?
The reformers were more protestant than people are today.
Satan has done some subtle work on the sheep. Prophetic
Ann Coulter is a Catholic. Now on a bender against fellow Catholics?
Here, here.
Ann, please use your acrid wit and shred us Catholics. We need the penance and flogging due to our sins.
I remember when Ann Coulter said something offending Jews last week and Mark Levin called her a “jack...” and Michael Medved said, “This is shameful.” While both men are brilliant, both showed pride.
I read that she was/is Episcopalian.
Same thing though, yer right.
IAE, she was just making a categorical statement: the Pilgrims escaped religious persecution in England by way of Holland so they could persecute their persecutors in the new world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.