Posted on 08/28/2015 11:39:41 AM PDT by doug from upland
This will be the first in a series of vignettes about sexual assault, coverup, and intimidation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident.
NAME THAT RAPIST
I believe you, Ron.
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
We will get there in this series.
Been discussed for years. Did a cursory search on this subject.....http://www.bing.com/search?q=1972%20Yale%20University%20sexually%20assaulted%20by%20a%20law%20student%20at%20the%20college&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=1972%20yale%20university%20sexually%20assaulted%20by%20a%20law%20student%20at%20the%20college&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=3448112BB09C4D04BE1F6622119A3539Had >387,000 results
Bush the Elder was a WW II hero. In the White House, however, his highest ambition was creating a "New World Order." I voted for him in 1988 against Mike Dukakis who, as a state legislator in Taxachusetts, filed bills which would have abolished criminal sanctions on those engaged in sexual relations with non-human animals, among many other moral atrocities.
Then Bush the Elder's policies had become obvious when he ran for POTUS again in 1992. I am ashamed to say that I voted for him in 1992 as well. Perot was just another malefactor of wealth abusing the system (not that Bush the Elder was any better in that respect just less bizarre as a personality).
I am also ashamed that I voted in 1996, for Robert Dole, also a WW II hero, in spite of the fact that he was certainly the "Tax Collector for the Welfare State," because four years of Slick Willy was quite enough. I could vote with satisfaction FOR the far more conservative and trustworthy Jack Kemp as the VPOTUS candidate.
Then there was the matter of John McCain in 2008, another war hero (whatever Trump may fantasize). His opponent was Obozo. One more time the GOP fog machine convinced me that Obozo was the boogieman. They convinced me to vote for McCain who seems likely insane and definitely untrustworthy on so many, many other issues. He is also the air-headed Miss Piggy's daddy for which he should never be forgiven.
You can see a couple of patterns here. One I was voting for war heroes. Two I really voted for Sarah Palin. Three, as to McCain, and Dole and Bush the Elder (and Feckless Gerald Ford and Tricky Dick before them) I was embarrassing myself by voting for any old POS with a "Republican" label.
A dwindling number of "Republicans" still do.
They even voted for a leftist absolute POS like Romney who BOUGHT his nomination and then went non-combatant in the face of his disciple Obozo. The moment that Willard was nominated ripped it for me. If I cannot even argue for such a POS, why should I vote for him? Why should anyone? When I die, I shall not have that baby-killing, marriage destroying, gun grabbing, anti-military, medicine destroying, nationalism despising, clueless pimp Romney on my conscience and I shall not have to attempt in vain to explain such a vote to my Creator who certainly knows better than the transparent advocates of the likes of Romney
OOOOOOOH but the intentions and MORALS of the voter mean nothing according to the GOP-E ringmasters because they have no morals of their own. But, but: Willard's opponent was another in the George McGovern era quadrennial demonrat boggiemen! Or should that be boogiepersons? We'll have to ask the RNC whores, right? No sense being EXTREME and embarrassing all those crony capitalist "respectables just because they are selling out us, our (former) party and our nation! It's just not NICE!
The "idiots who voted us in bammy and then voted him in again" are the ones that VOTED FOR OBOZO. The other idiots settled for Romney who would have added the wreckage of the Republican brand to Obozo's wreckage of America which Willard would have enthusiastically continued.
The numbers of brain dead automatic slaves to GOP-E corruption will certainly decrease because of demographics and an absolutely fatal lack of principle and creativity (other than coddling the rich and servicing the Wall Street, K Street and US Chamber of Crony Commerce gang).
Want the votes of actual CONSERVATIVES for the pathetic GOP's candidates? Stop nominating quislings. Stop trying to sell out every conservative principle in order to create a "New World Order" and to fatten up privileged but vacant-headed Muffie and Skipper's trust funds, beef up their strings of polo ponies and making big business profits the ONLY operative principle of the hollowed out shell of what was once (three decades ago and then skip back to Calvin Coolidge) a great political party and a force for actual good. Start nominating (at every level) candidates WORTH VOTING FOR.
Voting for the GOP-E trash that they usually nominate only encourages these criminals. If this country simply MUST be ruined, let it be ruined by expert Demonrats and revolution will follow sooner. Meanwhile, our response to the GOP-E enablers should be: Rule or Ruin! They don't get our votes EVER AGAIN! If you hallucinate otherwise, you will find out just how wrong you are the hard way.
If you think I or anyone else OWE the GOP-E our votes at election time, four million of us said otherwise last time. GOP-E candidate in 2016? How many will join actual conservatives in voting third party or boycotting? Another million? More? Willard is actually sending out feelers about 2016. Some enemies of our nation and of conservatism just don't get it! Go ahead and do it and see what happens! Third party voting or boycotting any GOP-E ridden race altogether are each well within our rights. If you want to vote for some quisling, feel free. That is YOUR right. As Finny has eloquently explained, when we vote (no matter the candidate) we vote FOR not AGAINST.
Finally, spare me the nonsense that you favored many or all of the other Republican candidates until finally there was only Willard. If you voted for Willard, you are an enabler of conservatives, an enemy of the future (if any) of the Republican Party and an enemy of the future (if any) of our nation, as a result. That trumps your claim that I somehow voted for Obama.
The verdict is in. You wouldn’t know a conservative vote if you saw one. Take your lefty candidates and reap the results. Romney created the cram down to churches in Mass to accept abortifacents. Who else do you support, in that liberal mind of yours.
The GOP has finally worn out the one thing they’ve used effectively to keep us voting for them: “The Democrats are worse than us.”
Not no more they ain’t.
See #26. I meant to ping you.
Elk, this is simply a case of a woman who enthusiastically backed a guy that profits from BBQing aborted babies trying to free her conscience of personal responsibility by the act of projection.
She knew. She voted for him. And she demanded long and loud everyone do likewise. The fact that most have admitted their mistake in light of all we have learned since upsets her and like a child, she lashes out, refusing to take responsibility for her actions.
Or she’s simply a liberal. What she is not is a conservative.
“If you voted for Willard, you are an enabler of conservatives”
That sentence is nonsense. How did a Romney vote make someone an enabler of conservatives?
Thanks for pointing out that egregious and embarrassing senior moment. The sentence should instead have included “enabler of the Marxist Muslim regime’s faux “Republican” love slaves.
Klintoon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.