Posted on 08/22/2015 1:50:50 PM PDT by NYer
In the command centers of Republican presidential campaigns, aides have drawn comfort from the belief that Donald J. Trumps dominance in the polls is a political summer fling, like Herman Cain in 2011 an unsustainable boomlet dependent on megawatt celebrity, narrow appeal and unreliable surveys of Americans with a spotty record of actually voting in primaries.
A growing body of evidence suggests that may be wishful thinking.
A review of public polling, extensive interviews with a host of his supporters in two states and a new private survey that tracks voting records all point to the conclusion that Mr. Trump has built a broad, demographically and ideologically diverse coalition, constructed around personality, not substance, that bridges demographic and political divides. In doing so, he has effectively insulated himself from the consequences of startling statements that might instantly doom rival candidates.
In poll after poll of Republicans, Mr. Trump leads among women, despite having used terms like fat pigs and disgusting animals to denigrate some of them. He leads among evangelical Christians, despite saying he had never had a reason to ask God for forgiveness. He leads among moderates and college-educated voters, despite a populist and anti-immigrant message thought to resonate most with conservatives and less-affluent voters. He leads among the most frequent, likely voters, even though his appeal is greatest among those with little history of voting.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
More than that.
It's precisely the "startling statements" (to the NYT; truth to everyone else) that cause people to support him.
I agree. I will say that I don’t use those terms with women. I would rather allow a woman to win a fight that I know I can’t win.
Until you’ve been slugged, or had a woman slug a friend your yours, you don’t really quite understand what I’m saying.
Yes, you can deck the broad, but what’s the win going to be like? Does your cause advance or suffer?
Some women play this routine to their advantage, and there’s not much you can do about it.
Lol, I cannot believe how many Trump supporters are unwilling to actually look at their candidates past statements and actions. Anyone who does point out his liberal history is immediately labeled a troll regardless of their posting history on FR. For your information, I am not a troll, I am a conservative who actually wants us to support a conservative rather than simply vote for the biggest loudmouth who is not and has never been a conservative.
FR almost seems like we've been discovered, agreed with ... and now even WE don't need ourselves anymore !
Easy for me as well. They all get up every 4 years, play uber-conservative for the primaries then move left for the general and screw us again.
No thanks, Trump is the only one without that history that I think has a real chance to win.
“Cruz has fought for us and as a result is not liked in the Senate. So, why should we trust Trump who has been buddy buddy with the Clintons and all of the Establishment and not trust Cruz who has virtually always been our champion?”
Cruz is my first choice. That said, I doubt he has a real chance at the nomination because he will have to compromise his principles to get enough money to be competitive. I wanted anyone but Arnold the Awful to be our governor here in California too, but you can see how that turned out.
A challenge has been thrown down to The Donald, and with his bulldog tenacity, he is responding, in grand manner.
Does The Donald have a reservoir of good will and a whole bunch of homilies all with a conservative cast? No, but he is perhaps one of the most pragmatic people around, he sees an opportunity, and he gets in line to make the deal.
To The Donald, this is a huge contract negotiation, and the opportunity to engage in some much bigger contract negotiations down the road. The Donald would dearly love to get in the same room with Putin, or Xi, or the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and drum into them the sanctity of keeping the deal. Because if they do not act in good faith, The Donald will enforce the contract, until they rethink their intransigence.
Trust, but verify. REALLY verify.
And maybe, that is what we need, at this time and place in history.
Thanks for the substantive reply. I question how much of his election season conversion on social issues is heartfelt but I hope that you are right and I am wrong.
POW !!!
He needs to dump this one.
A man could be 99% Conservative but I will oppose him if he embraces one little lick of gun control.
YOINK!
What really attracted me to Trump is that in 2011 he started talking about the trade issues and the offshoring of jobs. Trump gets that and no other candidate does.
Cruz is arguably the best candidate on social issues, but he wanted to give Obama fast track authority to negotiate even more job killing so-called free trade agreements. Cruz eventually changed his mind. But his initial support indicated he doesn’t understand the economy.
Trump is good enough on the social issues. And better than any other candidate on the economy.
Because he's a racist. /s
Sen. Cruz has also been very strong against illegal immigration. I will give Trump credit for helping to get people thinking about crimes committed by illegals. However, remember that in 2012 Trump was criticizing Romney for being too extreme on immigration and saying that Romney was going to scare Hispanics away from the Republican Party. So, Trump seems like a bit of an opportunist to me.
I think you find most Trump supporters are also in Ted Cruz’s corner.
I wasn’t happy with Cruz’s initial vote for the TPP either. I think he simply is a free trader (which is a position taken by many conservatives) though I am glad that he changed his mind when he saw that Sen. McConnell was cutting a deal with the Dems to reauthorize the corrupt export import bank.
Just heard on Kennedy (she had a pro wrestler on) that Trump is a member of the World Wide Wrestling Hall of Fame
donald-trump-talks-gun-control-assault-weapons-gun-free-zones-self-defense>
donald-trump-fully-support-and-back-up-the-second-amendment
donald-trump-asked-by-reporter-if-he-shoots-guns-his-response-is-awesome
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.