Posted on 08/21/2015 5:13:11 AM PDT by Kaslin
With Jimmy Carter's brave and touching announcement that he has cancer lesions on his brain, it's a good opportunity to reflect on his unexpected rise from small-town peanut farmer to president of the United States.
How, to put it bluntly, did a little-known, two-term state senator and one-term governor from Georgia defeat better-known members of his own party and then an incumbent president to win the White House, seemingly overnight?
If anyone's taking a page from Carter's playbook, it might just be Donald Trump.
Let's set the table: Eight years with the same party in the White House, two terms marked by considerable scandals, a flagging economy, the defeated drawdown of an ill-begotten war, "one of the worst periods in American-Israeli relations," as one world leader put it, and a growing dissatisfaction with Washington.
That sounds like today, but it was also 1976. During two Republican terms, one abruptly interrupted by the Watergate scandal, the country experienced the gloomy abandonment of the Vietnam War, the shaky instability of a bad economy -- which President Gerald Ford tried to fix by taxing corporations and the wealthy (sound familiar?) -- and Ford's significant misstep in "reassessing" aid to Israel, giving way to the quote above by Israel's Prime Minister Yithzak Rabin.
There was immense distrust and frustration, with the opportunity for Democrats to offer something new. But instead, they offered more of the same. Giving today's crowded GOP primary field a run for its money, 14 other Democrats vied for the nomination, including Arizona Rep. Morris Udall, Alabama Gov. George Wallace, Washington Sen. Henry Jackson, West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd, Sargent Shriver, Texas Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Indiana Sen. Birch Bayh.
Before the Iowa caucuses in January 1976, only 4 percent of Democrats said they'd support Jimmy Carter, and his name recognition was at 2 percent. After announcing his candidacy, the Atlanta Constitution -- his home state paper -- ran the headline, "Jimmy Who is Running For What!?"
A favorite oft-told story is of the game show episode when no one could guess the occupation of the "mystery guest," Gov. Carter.
And yet, early investments in a nascent Iowa caucus, running as an outsider and a Southern, conservative Democratic centrist, and capitalizing on voters' mistrust of Congress, made Carter an early frontrunner. He won the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, and began picking off his Democratic opponents one by one.
He also made his fair share of mistakes, any one of which could have tanked his campaign.
There was the ill-advised Playboy magazine interview, which came out weeks before the election, in which the married Baptist admitted to having "looked on a lot of women with lust."
And, two days before the election, an African-American minister was denied entry to Carter's church, which he accused Ford of orchestrating as a publicity stunt.
One of the bests boosts his candidacy got, though -- and this is an important warning to Trump's GOP rivals -- was when liberal Democrats formed the ABC movement -- "Anybody But Carter" -- in response to his beating establishment-friendly candidates Scoop Jackson in Pennsylvania and Udall in Wisconsin. With Idaho Sen. Frank Church and California Gov. Jerry Brown leading the charge, ABC defeated Carter in a couple late primaries, but his road to the nomination had already been cemented.
Carter, like Trump, used the media to his advantage, garnering a tremendous amount of coverage. Carter biographer Laurence Shoup writes that it was the media's "favorable coverage of Carter and his campaign that gave him an edge, propelling him rocket-like to the top of the opinion polls ... enabling him to rise from an obscure public figure to president-elect in the short space of 9 months."
While Trump's coverage by the media could hardly be called "favorable," he certainly is getting a ton of it, arguably to his advantage in the polls.
Of course, where Trump and Carter differ is in recognition and resources. Trump is already a national figure, and has said he may spend a billion dollars to win, unlike Carter who, according to the New Yorker's Jeffrey Frank, had to sleep in his supporters' homes during the campaign.
Carter was also far more polished and politically experienced than Trump. He was an outsider who still sounded reasonable, compassionate and prepared for the job. Trump sounds, well, like Trump.
Nonetheless, those who are hoping for the brash mogul's collapse should remember Carter's unlikely domination. Whether it's a peanut farmer or a billionaire, stranger things have happened.
We’d best hope not, Carter won.
To use a word is not necessarily to use it correctly. “Wizened” does not fit your sentence, even as “facetious sarcasm”, and that would be obvious if you did in fact know the meaning.
Stay ignorant if you want; I really don’t care.
You’re just a contrarian who has to get in his/her brilliance. To comment like you have shows you don’t even understand it all. You don’t know what you’re talking about. Take it back to your dictionary and style guide team.
Look up the word. Then GFY.
Yes. You can read. I can and did also. You can’t accept anything outside your rigid definition word application and propriety as you see it in your literal fashion, even in a sarcastic manner. Your arrogance is outstanding and your epithets are unnecessary. Good day.
It was a Nixon retribution. It took four years of Jimmy Peanut to set the stage for Reagan’s second try.
OK, any word means whatever anyone thinks it means. Got it. I’ll throw out my dictionary, and simply use words at random.
And a very good day to you, as well.
You’re just ticked because I knocked on the gal you apparently are smitten with (a whopping 36 years old and born three years after Carter was elected, BTW).
Either that or you’re just a know-it-all snob with OCD.
I thought Scoop Jackson was supposed to be pretty reasonable for a Democrat?
Well he was one of the old type democrats not one like the rats they are now
Actually I was 21 and working for the Ford Campaign at the time. Ford played the “Rose Garden” strategy very well looking Presidential and closed that gap very well in the months leading up the election. He made that huge gaff in the debates on some communist country having democracy.
He just came off as a Dim Bulb and lost, but not by that much. And yes that Pardon of Nixon hurt, but I think in the course of time that was the right decision.
Constructivism sport worth metallurgy riffle divine, possess weather juncture civilize.
Naloxone eigenvector polymorphous!
Reductio absurdum. Your prior post. This last one? I’d say your last lithium pill ran out.
Insurgent thymidine.
One Cupp short of a Starbuck’s Caramel Mocha Frappuccino.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.