Posted on 05/19/2015 12:34:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Chelseas chasing them out!
Sources near the Clinton Foundation are divulging inside secrets and attributing the organization’s high turnover rate to Chelsea Clintons difficult personality.
A lot of people left because she was there. A lot of people left because she didnt want them there, a source told The New York Posts Page Six.
She is very difficult.
Chelsea reportedly manipulates top staffers like pieces on a checker board, prompting many to quit in disgust.
Previous CEO Bruce Lindsey was pushed to the position of chairman of the board two years ago so Chelsea could bring in an old colleague, Eric Braverman, according to the Post.
But even that didnt last long.
[Braverman] was her boy, but he tried to hire his own communications professional and actually tried to run the place, an insider told the Post.
He didnt understand that that wasnt what he was supposed to be doing. He was pushed out.
Chelsea has embraced living high-on-the-hog as a corporate CEO and employs a personal staff almost as big as her fathers, according to the Post.
He has six [personal staffers]. She has five, a source said.
Chelsea who once commanded a $600,000 per year salary from NBC for doing virtually nothing, was apparently no easier to work with while working there, and co-workers allegedly called her unapproachable.
If someone wanted to talk to Chelsea about something, they had to go through a producer, an NBC source told the Post.
According to the Post, the high turnover rate at the Clinton Foundation also includes Matt McKenna, Chelseas ex-spokesman, and Ginny Ehrlich, founding CEO of the Clinton Health Matters Initiative, who now works for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Amidst growing scandals revolving around allegations that the Clinton Foundation has become a giant slush fund for Bill, Hillary and Chelsea, foundation loyalists are disheartened.
The operational planning has gone downhill, a source told the Post.
Its sad to see whats happening.
“Amidst growing scandals revolving around allegations that the Clinton Foundation has become a giant slush fund for Bill, Hillary and Chelsea,”
It’s what we have been saying from the beginning. Disguised as a “charity”, donors get to take a deduction on their taxes and the Clintons don’t have to pay the gift tax. All while donating as little as 6% of the money to actual charity work.
Recipients of gifts do not have to pay gift tax, the givers do, if the value of the gift is over a certain amount.
We know one thing, Chelseas difficult...to look at.
Well, I learned something new.
Wouldn’t it be great if someone ruled the Clinton Foundation wasn’t a charity and all the people who donated to them would have to pay the gift tax?
It would. It would very much.
Not unusual people tend to flee the stupid!
Even a few progressive liberal democrat communists has at least a sliver of common sense, emphasis on a FEW!
Well, lookie here - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3291435/posts
Raising “bitch” to an art form.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.