Skip to comments.
Lindsey Graham: If Court Rules Marriage Bans Unconstitutional It Will Be Time To “Move [tr]
Buzzfeed ^
| May 4, 2015
| Andrew Kaczynski and Molly Ward
Posted on 05/05/2015 9:01:44 AM PDT by C19fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: dware
I would add that they have no standing to make a decision on this as nowhere in the Constitution does it give the federal government the authority or power to define marriage. Therefore it is left to the states or the people themselves.
21
posted on
05/05/2015 9:12:31 AM PDT
by
rfreedom4u
(Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
To: C19fan
Sodom and Gomorrha
22
posted on
05/05/2015 9:18:26 AM PDT
by
Cedar
To: C19fan
In my world, the Senator would have said “...It will be time to move on DC.”
23
posted on
05/05/2015 9:18:40 AM PDT
by
ecomcon
To: C19fan
By declaring the DOMA unconstitutional didn’t the SC rule that the federal government had no business defining marriage?
24
posted on
05/05/2015 9:27:22 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: C19fan
Move on the what, Linda?
The next cave to the left?
25
posted on
05/05/2015 9:38:20 AM PDT
by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: dware
Yes it does. They will use “Just Law” to force their beliefs on all children and destroy churches and businesses of people that don’t comply.
If they force the irrational “law” into our “legal” system, it destroys Rule of Law and Right Reason which is essential in all “Just” (virtuous) Law.
Justice is the Queen of Virtue and a “Justice” System can never promote vile behaviors which strip Purpose from an institution and make it meaningless, and promote a vile irrational evil behavior to be “normal” and relegate babies to be sold and bought—and eliminate biological connections on purpose. It is pure evil and dehumanizing.
It is unjust law to promote vice always and sodomizing others is always an unnatural, vile use of the human body-—according to God’s Laws and man’s Reason.
Ejecting Reason from Just Law is unconstitutional and destroys the meaning of Law.
26
posted on
05/05/2015 9:45:52 AM PDT
by
savagesusie
(Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
To: savagesusie
Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. Render unto God what is God's. In this case, I refuse to render unto Caesar that which is God's. Nor will I recognize a ruling forcing God's people to live contrary to their beliefs - beliefs which, as I pointed out earlier, were ordained long before governments were instituted among men. In this case, the court has no business ruling on this, nor will a decision contrary to Christian beliefs have any impact on the way I conduct myself.
I believe the court will rule in favor of the LBGT community. I will ignore any ruling on this issue in favor of God's ruling. All Christians will be required to do the same. Any that propose the court has any jurisdiction in this matter should seek God's council.
27
posted on
05/05/2015 9:55:34 AM PDT
by
dware
(The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
To: C19fan
It didn’t take long for Graham to offer up his backside to the thespians.
28
posted on
05/05/2015 9:55:51 AM PDT
by
usurper
(Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
To: C19fan
Giving In is the only principle Republicans have.
29
posted on
05/05/2015 10:07:21 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(it's true!)
To: C19fan
Sounds as if he might be getting ready to come out of the closet.
30
posted on
05/05/2015 10:13:59 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(Oh, yeah. A voluntary internal aWe may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
To: C19fan
Defeatist wusses. Is that what we did with Roe Vs Wade? No. What’s wrong is wrong, no matter what the courts decide. The People do not want it. We are sick of being force-fed government lies and policies, and it’s time to stop this nonsense.
31
posted on
05/05/2015 10:14:56 AM PDT
by
Politicalkiddo
(So shines a good deed in a weary world. -Shakespeare)
To: Travis McGee
It was never intended for the federal government or any other level of government to be involved in marriage. Marriage is a pact between one man and one woman and God. Period.
To: lakecumberlandvet
33
posted on
05/05/2015 10:22:02 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: C19fan
The day of the decision, he marries McCain on the steps of the Supreme Court.
To: C19fan
No, Mr. Graham. It will be time to move to a different political party, split the country up, or move to a different country.
35
posted on
05/05/2015 10:25:32 AM PDT
by
dbehsman
(Attention liberals and liberaltarians, Judgment Day is coming. You've earned it!)
To: C19fan
She’s my little Lindsey Lupe Lu
36
posted on
05/05/2015 10:29:32 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: Responsibility2nd
He is no better than the libertarians who argue that the government should have no role in marriage anyway. The government should keep its nose out of Church matters - including marriage.
Regards,
37
posted on
05/05/2015 11:10:51 AM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: alexander_busek
Comments like yours indicate you know nothing of government nor church issues.
But as I looked at your FReep page - I see why you think that.
To think that marriage is only a church or religious issue is - well - stupid.
38
posted on
05/05/2015 12:10:48 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
To: C19fan
The mobs demanding same-sex marriage represents those who prefer sin and worldly passions over following the laws of God.
39
posted on
05/05/2015 12:42:05 PM PDT
by
Don_Ret_USAF
("No Government can survive Without The Trust Of The People.")
To: Responsibility2nd
...stupid....
Gosh, that charge is thrown around here a lot. More often as a lazy way to avoid developing one's argument to the contrary.
IMHO, I would never use it.
40
posted on
05/05/2015 12:45:27 PM PDT
by
onedoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson