Posted on 04/03/2015 12:39:51 PM PDT by QT3.14
Her -- I think her -- twitter page says that her interests include "helping the world."
Helping the world includes reporting as fraudulent a crowdfunding effort for a Christian family put out of business by leftwing hate.
(Excerpt) Read more at ace.mu.nu ...
Poster child of “metrosexual”
bump
Her/his station manager who is defending her/him can be reached at the following email address:
As a resident of metro Richmond I just emailed Mr. Hayes about Ms. Bryan. Told him she has the right to her own opinion but not the right to file, by her own admission, false fraud claims. Also that it spoke poorly of the integrity of his local news person (and that the story was getting out).
What is that...thing?
Well I sent an email to the guy that since she's a public figure working for him, then he's going to receive a lot of crap from here on..........LOL!
As far as your support for your employee Alix Bryan's claim that there was no GoFundMe support for Memories Pizza, you might want to check out their website......
http://www.gofundme.com/MemoriesPizza
While you are correct in stating that Alix Bryan's comments were made on her own private page, she's never the less a public figure and an employee of your station and your support of her fraudlent claims now make you an accessory.........
Alix Bryan = WTVR = fraudulent claims against GoFundMe = a lawsuit against Alix Bryan and her accessory employer WTVR.......... Have fun Mr. Hayes.......... DR
As well as being civilly actionable too. I hope some conservative lawyers step up and sue the sh*t out of her. If we don't start making examples of some of these left wing pawns, we aren't going to deter the others.
Exactly right. Perhaps someone should start a gofundme account for suing the sh*t out of these people.
What a genderless creep.
Her/his station manager who is defending her/him can be reached at the following email address:
shayes@wtvr.com
Fake but accurate. Where have we heard that before?
As well as being civilly actionable too. I hope some conservative lawyers step up and sue the sh*t out of her. If we don't start making examples of some of these left wing pawns, we aren't going to deter the others.If she made a formal complaint to a Law Enforcement Agency, then she has committed a crime for filing a false report.
I am four-square in favor of civil action.What is needed is a class action RICO civil suit which would bankrupt the AP.My problem extends far beyond the individual case, tho. IMHO we need an Antidefamation League for Christians and for conservatives. Because this is merely an instance of the general case, which is of a conspiracy - I use the term advisedly - against us.
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.- Adam Smith, Wealth of NationsThe Associated Press newswire is a virtual meeting of all major journalism outlets in America. A meeting not for merriment or diversion but precisely about what is or is not news, and why. The AP also puts out the AP Stylebook which relates to what terms are used, and in what way.The “objectivity” which the AP claims for itself and for all reporters in good standing with it is a bitter joke among the targets of the systematic libel being directed at Christians (the Memories Pizza shop being merely a symbol for all of us), white men (George Zimmerman, the “white hispanic,” being merely a symbol for all of us, Darren Wilson ditto), and Republicans (Sarah Palin being merely a symbol for all of us).
It is possible to attempt to be objective, and it is not wrong to claim that you are trying to be objective (if in fact you actually are trying). But to claim that you actually are objective is to essentially preclude the possibility of actually trying to be objective.
Any effort to be objective must start with a serious evaluation of the possibility that you are not objective. To claim a priori that you are objective is to prejudge that case and thus basically to moot any effort you might make at objectivity.
You express my own thoughts. RICO is one vehicle I thought should be applied to these media propaganda agents.
We need to do something which is proactive, but I fear any real action will have to wait until the next President. The criminals currently own the Justice department.
OTOH the Justice Department is irrelevant to a civil action - even, I would think, a civil RICO action.
I cannot grasp how RICO could be anything but a criminal action.
I think the conversation we need to be having ought to be how to hurt them financially and how to damage their credibility.
It ought to be the number one thing conservative web sites are discussing.
I'm in favor of any sort of leveraged assault upon them, so long as it hurts them worse than us.
Isn’t this the reporter that asked GFMe to fund her? vacation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.