Obama assails Supreme Court

The Washington Times ^ | January 21, 2015 | Dave Boyer

[jazusamo]

A day after snubbing liberal activists who were pushing for tougher campaign-finance regulations, President Obama took a swipe at the Supreme Court Wednesday for its “wrong” ruling five years ago on the issue.

“Five years ago, a Supreme Court ruling allowed big companies – including foreign corporations – to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence our elections,” Mr. Obama said in a statement. “The Citizens United decision was wrong, and it has caused real harm to our democracy.”

The president said it was time to “reverse” the trend of unlimited spending on political ads by third parties, but he offered no solutions.

“With each new campaign season, this dark money floods our airwaves with more and more political ads that pull our politics into the gutter,” Mr. Obama said. “Rather than bolster the power of lobbyists and special interests, Washington should lift up the voices of ordinary Americans and protect their democratic right to determine the direction of the country that we love.”

[jazusamo]

King 0bama again speaks out against SCOTUS, the juvenile doesn't forget.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Obola is going to Breitbart Ruth. Count on it.

[kingu]

So once you have a job and employ people, your constitutional right to participate in the political process ends? Unless you’re a union or someone else who votes liberal (oh, hey, the Chinese are handing Al Gore another check...)

[jimfree]

The bastard-in-chief was elected in part with foreign money.

[skeeter]

The MSM is turning up the Kenyan Klown's microphone.

His will be the ONLY voice we hear for the next couple of years. They'll see to it.

[jazusamo]

That’s what ticked off boy president, it leveled the playing field with his thug unions and the likes of Trumka.

[Raycpa]

zzzzzzzzzzzzz.....ZZZZZZZZZ

[V_TWIN]

Get over it ya baby.......WE WON!

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[jazusamo]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

[Blood of Tyrants]

I suppose he wants to limit the amount of money unions can spend to get Rats elected, too. /sarc

[FlingWingFlyer]

“The Citizens United decision was wrong, and it has caused real harm to our democracy.”

More proof that Barack Hussein Obama is an ignorant jackass.

[Oliviaforever]

He may be the only president to condemn sound SCOTUS rulings.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Roger that. Takes a lot of money to balance out the unreported in kind contributions from unions and the like.

[Gamecock]

**harm to our democracy**

A. We don’t have a democracy.
B. If anyone knows about causing harm, it is that idiot.

[Sgt_Schultze]

“Five years ago, a Supreme Court ruling allowed big companies – including foreign corporations – to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence our elections,” Mr. Obama said in a statement. “The Citizens United decision was wrong, and it has caused real harm to our democracy.”

Meanwhile, his campaign organization took measures to facilitate the receipt of illegal foreign campaign contributions. Response in the media - crickets.

[JPG]

‘If you don’t like my policies, go out there and win an election.’

-Barack Obama

[molson209]

The SCOTUS will just sit back because this Twerp will be gone SOON

[Spartan79]

Obola is going to Breitbart Ruth. Count on it.

I think that is very unlikely. In fact, if the GOP has any gonads (I know, I know) Obama has had his last judge at any level confirmed by the Senate. I would extend that to any presidential appointments at any level.

Should Ginzburg retire or leave this vale of tears, that would result in a SCOTUS with four solid conservatives, three consistent liberals and one squish. Better than what we have now. No Obama appointee will move the court to the right.

[tet68]

King 0bama again speaks out against SCOTUS, the juvenile doesn’t forget.

Neither do the Justices...