Posted on 01/19/2015 5:12:05 AM PST by SJackson
The Real George Zimmerman
Posted By Ari Lieberman On January 19, 2015 @ 12:38 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 11 Comments
George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, is unsurprisingly in the news again. It seems he just cant get his act together. This time hes accused of throwing a wine bottle at his girlfriend who has described him as a psychopath and smashing her cell phone, which earned him an aggravated assault charge. Zimmerman, who appeared in handcuffs and a blue prison uniform during his arraignment, was released on $5,000 bond.
This isnt Zimmermans first brush with the law since his July 2013 acquittal on second degree murder charges. In fact, menacing with firearms and bouts of domestic violence are recurring themes in Zimmermans checkered history. Shortly after the July 2013 trial, for instance, Zimmermans now ex-wife Shellie made a panicked phone call to police alleging that Zimmerman had threatened her with a firearm, smashed her iPad and punched her father in the face. Hes in his car and he continually has his hand on his gun and he keeps saying, Step closer hes just threatening all of us with his firearm and hes going to shoot us, Shellie Zimmerman frantically told a 911 dispatcher before police arrived at the scene. A weapon was never recovered in this case, but 911 audio demonstrates a sincere belief on the part of Shellie Zimmerman that her estranged husband had a gun in his possession and that her life was in danger.
A few months after the altercation with his ex-wife, Zimmerman was also accused by another girlfriend, Samantha Scheibe, of threatening her with a shotgun and engaging in a destructive tirade which ended in Zimmerman barricading himself in Scheibes home. Scheibe told police that Zimmerman had broken some of her belongings and then pushed her outside of the residence, locking the door. Yet another girlfriend, former fiancé Veronica Zuazo, filed for and was granted a restraining order against Zimmerman in 2005 over domestic violence allegations. Zimmerman cross-claimed with his own accusations of domestic violence and was granted a restraining order against Zuazo.
In September 2014, Zimmerman was again in the news over a road rage incident in which he allegedly followed another motorist and harassed him while both were driving. The alarmed driver pulled off the road to call 911, telling the dispatcher that Zimmerman had threatened to shoot him. According to the other driver, whose identity was not released to the public, Zimmerman fled before police arrived. A few days later, the same driver made another call to police alleging that he saw Zimmerman in his truck outside his place of work.
Criminal charges in the above cases were either dropped or never filed, but they do give a strong indication of the real character of George Zimmerman. The latest altercation coupled with the previous incidents paint a portrait of a troubled man with, to say the least, some serious anger management issues. While this does not render him a murderer, it certainly does chip away at his credibility. And since there were only two antagonists in the Trayvon Martin shooting case, one of whom is dead, credibility is a central issue.
As noted by David Horowitz in a July 2013 article, Is the Zimmerman Case Really Open and Shut?, there were a number of facts in this case that were indisputable. Zimmerman lied during the proceedings. He schemed with his wife to conceal the fact that he had received well over a hundred thousand dollars in donations. He disingenuously stated that he had no knowledge of Floridas Stand Your Ground law when it was established that he in fact did know of the law. And he stated that Martin jumped out at him from the bushes, when there were no bushes in that area. Moreover, Zimmerman sustained very superficial injuries some minor scrapes and bumps and these injuries are not entirely consistent with the life and death struggle that Zimmerman described.
Trayvon Martin, who had made a purchase at a local convenience store, was unarmed when he was killed. Zimmerman, a cop wannabe, marked Martin as suspicious, because, as we now know, he was young, black and wearing a hoodie. Prosecutors asserted that Zimmerman disregarded a police dispatchers specific instructions to stop following Martin, though Zimmerman disputes this and claimed that he was merely trying to verify his location. Whichever version is accurate, it is indisputable that by initially exiting his vehicle and following Martin, Zimmerman put into motion a sequence of events that ultimately culminated in a confrontation which led to the tragic death of an unarmed 17-year-old youth with no criminal record.
As observed by Horowitz, Zimmerman inexplicably stated in an interview with Sean Hannity that he would not have done anything differently that night because it was Gods plan. That bizarre and heartless response speaks volumes about Zimmermans character. Surely Zimmerman had a multitude of alternatives. For one thing, he could have placed a 911 call from his car and left it at that.
Horowitz was criticized by numerous Frontpage readers in the comment section of his article for ostensibly taking too liberal of a position. But Zimmermans repeated post-acquittal run-ins with the law where his rage and aggression are central and undeniable themes have vindicated Horowitzs position that this case was far from clear-cut in terms of Zimmermans alleged self-defense. There was, in fact, ample reason to question Zimmermans account of events and the legal process needed to take its course.
This is not to say that Zimmermans version of events was untrue and his acquittal wrong. The defense did an excellent job in raising reasonable doubt, but some myopic conservatives were clearly too quick to assume Zimmermans innocence, ignoring an abundance of inculpatory evidence while focusing instead on exculpatory evidence. In many ways, their reactions mimicked those of radical leftists and race-baiters like Al Sharpton, who automatically assumed that Zimmerman was guilty regardless of the sufficiency of the evidence and ramped up an unassuageable campaign of lynch mob justice.
With all the $hit and hate Zimmerman went through I tend to believe it affected him in more ways than one. That’s not an excuse, but he probably needs to get some professional help because of what he went through on a national stage.
Which came first, the “chicken” (Zimmerman’s psychological issues) or the “egg” (overwhelming stress of the attempting railroading)?
I didn’t know him before any of this crap went down, so it’s pretty hard to judge.
I imagine that going through what he went through would make me a little crazy, too. In fact, I’m not sure I would have held up as well as *he* did.
Its always been my opinion that Zimmerman should not have followed Martin but he was still innocent because he shot in self defense.
Lieberman is an idiot.
Zimmerman is (or at least was) an Obama supporter. And conservatives can agree that he was correct in preventing Martin from dashing his brains out on a concrete walk. And right in protecting his community by being a member of the neighborhood watch.
That’s it. Every time this clown threatens a wife or girlfriend he should be taken to task
17-year-old youth with no criminal record.
No ADULT criminal record
The real Trayvon didn’t matter one iota to libtards.
I agree. I wonder what he was like before Trayvon?
The other thing- much of this post-trial stuff DOES NOT MATTER, IMO. Trayvon was still a thug (at lest that night), who was pounding GZ’s head against the ground/sidewalk.
Think Kissinger regarding the Iran/Iraq war in the 80’s: It’s too bad they both can’t lose.
>>17-year-old youth with no criminal record.
>>
>>No ADULT criminal record
Speaking of which, what ever happened with getting Trayvon Martin’s juvy records released? At one time there was supposedly someone in FL working on that.
If we had a real media, they’d have worked harder on that in the interests of getting the whole story.
Agreed... This was obama zombie meets obama zombie with expected results and one got voted off the island.
Zimmerman was convicted by the left of using the 2nd amendment as a refuge in light of his bad judgement to escalate the situation.
He is no hero to the right, regardless of how the left wants to change the story.
The beast that tried to eat George Zimmerman was laying in wait for prey to stumble by. It still wants him,it doesn't like to miss a kill.
So what if he followed St. Skittles. He has every right to follow whoever he wants to unless he attacks said person. He killed the thug in self defense.
LOL I just knew somebody would get their panties in a twist.
“Its always been my opinion that Zimmerman should not have followed Martin...”
Tough call....I’m reminded of two cases. The first involves a young George Patton. He saw what he thought was a woman being forced into a car. He intervened, but it turned out to be a complete misunderstanding.
In the other case, a witness testified that he saw a man walking a woman into a park. He knew something didn’t look right, and he was tempted to follow, but....well....he was late for work...so he drove on. In this case the woman was raped and murdered.
After the fact it’s always an easy call, but at the time....
This article really piles it on good & heavy.
Nice hatchet job, Ari.
And with the liberal MSM and activists continuously targeting him and the he vs she version of events that never seem to completely match up whose to say if anyone is telling the truth. One truth we do know - the liberal MSM and their followers have targeted Zimmerman and what he stood for for extinction and they are relentless; the truth doesn’t matter at this point; only what they want does...
“George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin”
I can’t believe he forgot the words “unarmed black” in the 1st sentence, the libs are slippin’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.