Posted on 11/22/2014 4:03:19 PM PST by xzins
"(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES.
"(A) IN GENERAL.The President may not implement any change under paragraph (1) unless at least
"(i) 60 days,
"(ii) one year, in the case of a major change described in subparagraph (D)(iii), or
"(iii) two years, in the case of a major change described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (D), before the date of implementation of the change, the President has prepared and transmitted to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. If the President proposes to make any change regarding social security account number cards, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress.
"(B) CONTENTS OF REPORT.In any report under subparagraph (A) the President shall include recommendations for the establishment of civil and criminal sanctions for unauthorized use or disclosure of the information or identifiers contained in such system.
"(C) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF MAJOR CHANGES.
"(i) HEARINGS AND REVIEW.The Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall cause to have printed in the Congressional Record the substance of any major change described in subparagraph (D), shall hold hearings respecting the feasibility and desirability of implementing such a change, and, within the two year period before implementation, shall report to their respective Houses findings on whether or not such a change should be implemented.
"(ii) CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.No major change may be implemented unless the Congress specifically provides, in an appropriations or other Act, for funds for implementation of the change.
"(D) MAJOR CHANGES REQUIRING TWO YEARS NOTICE AND CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.As used in this paragraph, the term 'major change' means a change which would
"(i) require an individual to present a new card or other document (designed specifically for use for this purpose) at the time of hiring, recruitment, or referral,
"(ii) provide for a telephone verification system under which an employer, recruiter, or referrer must transmit to a Federal official information concerning the immigration status of prospective employees and the official transmits to the person, and the person must record, a verification code, or
"(iii) require any change in any card used for accounting purposes under the Social Security Act, 42 USC 301 note. including any change requiring that the only social security account number cards which may be presented in order to comply with subsection (bXlXCXi) are such cards as are in a counterfeit-resistant form consistent with the second sentence of section 205(cX2XD) of the Social ecurity Act. 42 use 405.
,; "(E) GENERAL REVENUE FUNDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CARD CHANGES.Any costs incurred in developing and implementing any change described in subparagraph (D) (iii)for purposes of this subsection shall not be paid for out of any trust fund established under established under the Social Security Act.
The statute of limitations has probably lapsed on the Obamacare suit [/sarc]
/johnny
There were provisions for EO’s built into the legislation?!!!???
Never knew that....
Pretty awesome and further bolsters the imprimatur of Reagan’s EO, as per the law and under what circumstances.
FU Obama!!! And yer sycophants. ...
Not in Article III, anyway. Could be elsewhere.
how about thirty-two states bringing seperate lawsuits before the DC district asking for an injunction?
Our Glorious Leader don’t need no stinking law. Our Glorious Leader is the law.
/johnny
Bfl. Interesting.
Pretty awesome and further bolsters the imprimatur of Reagans EO, as per the law and under what circumstances.
Chode, time for the and another one in the Ha Ha!
with this find...
you might be the new Buckhead!
TAKE A Bow!
If the President proposes to make any change regarding ****social security account number cards****, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress.
Hal Rogers, Mike Enzi v. Jeff Sessions and the rest of us.
Buckhead is a genius in a field; I was just reading the law. (And I’m neither a lawyer nor the son of a lawyer.)
Nonetheless, I hope this is relevant and stops this president in his lawless tracks.
Hmmm...if it’s all as clear as this, why haven’t we heard from a single member of Congress? Don’t they have staff researchers, legal counsel, and advisors whose job it is find this stuff?
And we have Hal Rogers, General Dynamics as the smokin gun to the Chamber of Commerce attack aided by the Uniparty!
Thank you, SIR!
I know. I was just putting the rhetorical question to Mark.
They are so busy studying campaign finance law for loopholes, they really don't have time for the other stuff.
Every time I ask that question the answer is usually “they don’t have standing”......... I am beginning to wonder what the Supreme Court does?
Always sitting. Nothing that involves standing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.