Posted on 11/02/2014 5:33:59 AM PST by Kaslin
Look, Im not going to lie to you your vote matters. But lets be honest, there are Republicans on the ballot who arent very conservative. Most of them dont agree with me on everything and surely dont agree with you on everything. In fact, many of them are downright awful.
So if you find yourself in a state where the Senate race is close, and you dont like some of the things the Republican candidate stands for just stay home.
A message must be sent: We conservatives could not beat all the people we dont like in the primary, so were not going to vote.
Thatll show the establishment. Thatll show the country. Thatll show the future.
So if youre a conservative in Colorado, dont vote for Cory Gardner. If youre in Iowa, show that Joni Ernst whats what! Live in North Carolina? Who does that Thom Tillis think he is, anyway? From Kentucky? Let Mitch McConnell know whos boss! Georgia? David Perdue? I dont think so. Kansas? Teach that Pat Roberts a lesson! Live in New Hampshire? Scott Brown yuck, am I right?
Look, if conservatives dont draw a line in 2014, when will it be drawn?
Just because tea party and conservative candidates couldnt win a majority in primary challenges doesnt mean they arent the majority. It was dirty tricks and the establishment that screwed you everyone knows that. So show the establishment you wont take not getting your way anymore.
Honestly, whats the point of voting for a candidate who agrees with you a majority of the time? Dont vote. Let someone who you agree with on nothing win, and then next time in six years that person comes up for reelection, maybe the Republican Party will come to its senses and let you get your way.
I mean, what would be better for the country Harry Reid or Mitch McConnell as Senate Majority Leader? Obviously Harry Reid. Mitch McConnell is a squish on a few things, wouldnt run blocker for President Obama and wouldnt be a rubberstamp for any Supreme Court nominee, or any court, for that matter. Wheres the lesson for the establishment for that?
Sure, I know, the country will have a court system packed with activist judges, and the president will use his magic pen and phone to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens and who knows what else, but principle will be maintained. Thats a moral victory, right? Those count for something in politics, right? They have to count for something
Of course, they count for nothing. Yet that nothing is what many millions of Americans, including many of you (judging by comments on other columns in which Ive dealt with this topic), are prepared to vote for by stubbornly refusing to vote for a candidate who isnt your candidate.
Sorry, your candidate lost, and your remaining choice sucks. I get it, Ive been there. But so what! Get over yourself. Everyone who voted in the primary and your choice lost. It happens. Its part of life. So youre just going to quit?
If you want to right the ship of state, how did you think that would work? Your one chosen candidate would somehow undo half a century of constitutional disregard in 20 minutes? Of course not. Its all going to be incremental. Nothing this big turns on a dime. But before it can get any better it has to stop getting worse.
Harry Reid remaining majority leader in the Senate means things continue to get worse. Barack Obama packing the courts with like-minded judges means things will continue to get worse.
There will come a point of no return, where we will tip over that ledge from which there is no coming back. If you stay home, or you cast a message vote for some third party nothing-burger, thats what youre voting for. Thats what youll get, and thats the country youll be leaving for your kids to inherit.
A vote for anyone other than the Republican, no matter who that Republican is, is a vote for Harry Reid and Barack Obama.
You want to purge the party? Do it from a position of strength. Im all for a battle royale for the soul of the Republican Party, but not until AFTER the Democrats are vanquished.
Tuesday, go vote. Vote for the Republicans. Send a message that you are not a moody, unreliable person who will take your ball and go home if you dont get your way, but that you accept your partys primary decision. Its a decision you dont like. Its a decision youll fight in the next primary if necessary. But for the good of the country, youll live in now and work for the future.
Anything else is a vote for progressives, and anyone who does that is no conservative.
Ted Cruz.
These people get lied to, kicked in the teeth, beat and betrayed over and over and they keep coming back for more and more...
Battered voter syndrome?
A pattern of signs and symptoms, such as fear and a perceived inability to escape, appearing in voters who are physically and mentally abused over and over.
That’s the POINT. I voted Perot “to teach the GOP a lesson”, Which I regretted. Vote for the GOP guy, even though it stinks this time.
There we have it........ testimony offering truth
no pompous balderdashious drivel but an honest assessment of the third party destruction
You, too, huh?
It's true that GHWB wasn't anything to write home about. But it turned out the alternative was a massive mistake -- corrupt beyond imagination.
Good point. A lot of my friends did that. The damage is still with us. And getting ready to run for president in 2016.
OK, so IF Jimmy Carter won in 1980 we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
GO BACK TO SLEEP!
Damn Norm. 9 hours later and you even brought in supplies.
I’ve walked three liberal dogs and shot a squirrel in that time. Get yourself some food. Maybe cater the event.
Ditter: I am glad you figured it out, tell Finny. Most perot voters won't admit that what they did was wrong. I commend you.
As it happens was as ticked off at Perot voters are you guys were -- I voted straight Republican ticket. As I have done every election since 1976. That is, until 2012.
I used to think just like most of the posters on this thread -- support the Republican whatever the cost. I subscribed to it for DECADES and it has only made things worse. HELLO??????????? Anybody home?
I woke up in 2012. I voted third party and regard your vote for Romney in 2012 as something you did that was wrong that you refuse to admit was wrong. But it was wrong and you're damned lucky the bastard lost.
So get over it. If the guy had won and done what Romney has always done, you guys who voted "against" Obama would be the first to deny culpability.
This isn't about "teaching a lesson." Excuse me, but consciously voting for pond scum like Cochran is destined for disaster if the bastard wins. YIKES!!! Intentions are dreams. Actions have consequences. When you vote for liberals ... YOU GET LIBERALISM.
When are you going to figure that out? It only took me 30 years!
Sorry — forgot to ping you to 631!
"I'm the guy" - really? Amazing. The lack of understanding is that you seem to think you are defined by who you vote for; that voting for only conservatives somehow makes you more conservative than the guy who votes for a Romney (Jim Robinson anyone?).
No my friend, the way you live your life defines you. Do you really think you're more conservative than me (or JimRob) when it comes to the 2nd Amendment, abortion, or a host of other issues? I doubt it.
When I vote, I'm not picking a mate, a baby-sitter, my priest, my best friend, or my business partner. I'm picking a politician, I'm casting a vote, and in the end I'm taking a gamble. I'm gambling that the guy I pick can make a difference in moving the governance of this country in the way I would like to see it go.
Note the operative word: can
Obviously, your write-in candidates can't. They won't be elected, that can't form coalitions with elected conservative legislators. They are a protest vote - nothing more.
I don’t even know where to start. Where do you even come up with the drooling idiocy you posted above? Where? What exactly do you think standing on principle is? What purpose do you ‘feel’ it serves?
On second thought, don’t bother answering. I’m not real concerned with your amateur psycho analysis or the results you can imagine up.
PS, Jim admitted he made an error. Had a post about it a while back IIRC (and I do) Take it up with him.
Good luck to you NL - and may God bless you.
What IF.......... the vote is totally manipulated in most districts?... Federal, and even State and Local in some places....
Arguing about voting tactics then... would be a grand delusion..
What appears to be isn’t, what happens is what is SUPPOSED to happen..
Decided by “SOMEONE”... or a cabal of somebody’s...
like Logans Run.. -OR- the same process in degrees of totality..
Like Pavlov’s dogs... ignoring the whistle zoned in on the “reward”..
Like the 2012 republican convention where a KNOWN obvious collaborator with democrats, a shill, was chosen(Myth Romney).. AND.... several well know conservatives were rejected...
You Know............. BY CONSERVATIVES...
/ or was he?/
If you read my post again, I allude to defeating the RINO in the NEXT PRIMARY if he/she can not be persuaded to vote more conservative. The incumbent democrat will be difficult to defeat in the next GENERAL election, as an incumbent.
General versus Primary are completely different situations. You should try to understand the difference.
Thank you for all your insights, dearest sister in Christ!
I recall people demanding all vote for Bush no matter what. On and on... All were urged to save all that immigration stuff until AFTER he was elected. All that could wait ya know.
People were routinely called “single issue voters”. Those concerned with the security of our homeland and wide scale violence and wholesale lawlessness were labeled malcontents.
And here we go again....
The dirty secret the GOPe can't let out of the bag, because once you realize this it castrates their yells of vote for our guy; the other guy's worse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.