Skip to comments.
The Real Goal Behind the Bergdahl Deal
AP/Real Clear Defense ^
| June 5, 2014
| By Kathy Gannon
Posted on 06/05/2014 7:53:25 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
The announcement that the U.S. government had secured the release of missing U.S. Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl and that it was freeing five senior Taliban figures from Guantanamo Bay has been portrayed first and foremost as a prisoner exchange. But the four-year history of secret dialogue that led to Saturday's release suggests that the main goal of each side may have been far more sweeping.
It was about setting the stage for larger discussions on a future peaceful Afghanistan.
As The Associated Press first reported in 2011, talks about releasing the five senior Taliban reach back to at least late 2010, following nearly a decade of war. In the beginning, the name of Bergdahl, who was captured in mid-2009, was not even part of the equation.
The Taliban have sought a prisoner release from the beginning of their contacts with U.S. negotiators, while the U.S. side was looking for confidence-building gestures to keep the conversation going, with the ultimate aim of bringing hostilities in Afghanistan to an end. . .
(Excerpt) Read more at realcleardefense.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bergdahl; bobbergdahl; bowebergdahl; gitmo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Make a long story short--the Administration was willing to take the short end of the prisoner swap in hopes that these cave dwelling savages would entertain a "larger conversation" about the future of Afghanistan.
To: Brad from Tennessee
A more peaceful Afghanistan, huh?
God, these people are freaking idiots.
2
posted on
06/05/2014 7:54:56 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Brad from Tennessee
3
posted on
06/05/2014 7:54:56 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
To: Brad from Tennessee
And this clown wants to tell Israel what to do.
4
posted on
06/05/2014 7:56:28 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Good report.
The idea sprang to me while reading this that the three Bergdogs were complicit with this plan from the outset. If so, they all are treasonous.
To: Brad from Tennessee
The Muzzie In Chief just wanted to get his good buddies out of Gitmo.
6
posted on
06/05/2014 7:58:47 AM PDT
by
immadashell
(The inmates are running the asylum.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Gov. Rick Perry appeared with KTRH’s Sean Hannity on Fox News to ask some questions of his own about the Bergdahl case. “I really would like for somebody to take a look at this and answer it,” said Perry.
“Was this done to take the VA (scandal) off the front page of the newspapers?” Perry said the timing of the Bergdahl release is suspect, especially since it happened without any notification of Congress, as is required by law for the release of any Gitmo detainee. “What is the strategy, what is the foreign policy that is going into place here,” asked Perry. “Is it just haphazard, is it just whatever we need to do to move a press story?”
Read more: http://www.ktrh.com/articles/houston-news-121300/texas-leaders-sound-off-on-prisoner-12427121#ixzz33mF6jyW1
7
posted on
06/05/2014 7:59:20 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
Rick is not sharp and gets his ideas from reading week-old FReeper posts. Which is better than reading/watching the daily news.
To: immadashell
The Muzzie In Chief just wanted to get his good buddies out of Gitmo.
9
posted on
06/05/2014 8:02:26 AM PDT
by
QT3.14
To: Brad from Tennessee
To: Brad from Tennessee
Obama doesn’t give a flying crap about Afghanistan’s future save the exception that it not include the US and in a manner that can be connected to him.
11
posted on
06/05/2014 8:04:44 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: thackney
Gov. Rick Perry appeared with KTRH’s Sean Hannity on Fox News to ask some questions of his own about the Bergdahl case. “I really would like for somebody to take a look at this and answer it,” said Perry.
“Was this done to take the VA (scandal) off the front page of the newspapers?” Perry said the timing of the Bergdahl release is suspect
_______________________________________________________
Boo-yah! Perry nailed it. I read this point a few days ago here at FR and I've been repeating it often. The Bergdahl scandal was created to take the heat off the VA scandal.
We are on scandal overload here folks. And have been since the Kenyan Regime began
12
posted on
06/05/2014 8:05:22 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Brad from Tennessee
13
posted on
06/05/2014 8:06:02 AM PDT
by
SC DOC
To: Brad from Tennessee
Well now, let's not be to hasty. Maybe Barack should just go over there by himself. He could just go cave to cave and you know, organize them.
14
posted on
06/05/2014 8:06:28 AM PDT
by
defconw
(Well now what?)
To: Brad from Tennessee
A farmer has a problem with Coyotes eating his chickens. Obama’s solution.....
Just put a chicken or too out away from all the other chickens every night and the coyotes will leave the chickens alone.
That is the extent of our nation’s foreign policy logic these days.
15
posted on
06/05/2014 8:06:43 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(Tagline deleted at the request of an offended FReeper.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
He has already told Israel what to do.
16
posted on
06/05/2014 8:09:17 AM PDT
by
Pecos
(The Chicago Way: Kill the Constitution, one step at a time.)
To: Pecos
But Israel has paid him no heed.
Thank God.
17
posted on
06/05/2014 8:10:39 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: Brad from Tennessee
The Taliban have sought a prisoner release from the beginning of their contacts with U.S. negotiators, while the U.S. side was looking for confidence-building gestures to keep the conversation going, with the ultimate aim of bringing hostilities in Afghanistan to an end. . .
We delayed the release of this 'hero' for politics? Is that what they are saying?
To: Responsibility2nd
I read this point a few days ago here at FR and I've been repeating it often. The Bergdahl scandal was created to take the heat off the VA scandal. I don't know if I was the first to postulate this. But I believe it. Further, I honestly think Obama 1) Didn't know the controversy around Berghl's desertion and 2) Planned to keep the prisoner relase from Gitmo TOP SECTRET. This is why he had to sneak the release illegally.
Look for Obama to some day use the Iran Contra Affair as precedence for his subversive and illegal pursuit in this matter.
19
posted on
06/05/2014 8:11:55 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(Tagline deleted at the request of an offended FReeper.)
To: Resettozero
Who else was saying that on a major news network?
20
posted on
06/05/2014 8:15:06 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson