Posted on 05/12/2014 6:46:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
On this week's McLaughlin Group, the Daily Beast's Eleanor Clift showed an ignorance of the facts about the Benghazi terrorist attack that should disqualify her from commenting on it.
Get a load of this:
CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO
ELEANOR CLIFT: I would like to point out Ambassador Stevens was not murdered. He died of smoke inhalation in the safe room in that CIA installation.
SUSAN FERRECHIO: I don't think that's a fact, Eleanor.
CLIFT: I think that is a fact.
FERRECHIO: I've heard a drastically different story from people who are also in the know about that. So, I don't think it is --
PAT BUCHANAN: It was a terrorist attack, Eleanor. He was murdered in a terrorist attack.
CLIFT: It was an opportunistic terrorist attack that grew out of that video.
BUCHANAN: The video had nothing to do with it.
CLIFT: There were demonstrations across the world.
And the victims of 9/11 didn't die in a terrorist attack. They burned to death. Or were crushed. Or they also died of smoke inhalation. Someone that obtuse should join the defense teams of KSM and the 9/11 conspirators.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Thank you.
Would it be asking too much to put a "Hillary 2016" logo on her beret or make her coat look like a jersey with the logo on it?
I found a dollar bill I received recently in change and on the back of the bill, In God we Trust, the word GOD is blacked out and written across the bill is THE TREATY OF TRIPOLI.
I thought that may be some Muslim defaced the Dollar bill.
I couldnt find much about that here:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120405201044AAn5s88
I thought that you or another Freeper may have heard of this?
She must think it was a bunch of FaceBook Tea Party members who went wild because of the video...
For that we have to go to the oval office.
Hey Elenor, maybe bring out the survivors and they might have a different take on the attack.
Guess she isn’t that interested in the truth.
Neither is any of the other obamamedia.
Eleanor what caused the smoke inhalation ?.
Did you see the trailer? There was nothing Christian about it. It was a stupid, poorly made video. Nobody was protesting it. Nobody cared.
I know. Sorry. I misplaced my sarc tag when posting that.
You’re welcome, I’ll see what I can do with your other ideas.
The sarcasm was obvious with regards to the video being to blame. I just wasn’t sure about the “Christian” part. A lot of people seem to actually believe the video in question was a Christian video. Anyone who’s actually watched the trailer knows better, but I think most people, even among those talking about it, haven’t actually seen it. And I’m still not convinced there was ever a full movie. All I’ve ever seen was the trailer. As far as I can tell, the obama administration is blaming the Benghazi terrorist attack and the worldwide 9/11 uprisings on a movie that never existed, and implying it was a Christian video. I’ve seen a lot of people speaking up about the obvious lie that the video was at fault, but I haven’t seen anyone addressing the perception that it was a Christian video, or the lie that muslims everywhere but Benghazi were so busy protesting it they never noticed it was 9/11. It seems to be universally accepted that there was a full length Christian movie. The only disagreement seems to be over whether it’s at fault in Benghazi. The administration presents as proof the “fact” that muslims around the world were protesting the Christian movie. I see people declaring that doesn’t prove it was to blame in Benghazi, but nobody ever calls them out on the fact that it wasn’t a Christian video, and muslims the world over were observing the anniversary of 9/11/2001, not protesting a video they’d never heard of. /rant (or rant paused antways).
Well, if he was a Democrat then just maybe it was consensual(?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.