Posted on 10/28/2012 11:22:13 PM PDT by Snuph
Is President Obama willing to incite civil unrest to win re-election? As we have all been encouraged to wear our dog-whistle decoders these days, one can hardly be blamed for wondering. Worse yet, we know the answer. He is already doing it.
Please bear with me, as this topic requires considerable delicacy.
According to Rolling Stone, Barack Obama has now called Mitt Romney "a bull*****er," on the record. His anger at the challenger was palpable -- that is, carefully staged -- during each of the last two presidential debates. And he has made a central theme of his campaign the warning that a Romney presidency would erase all of the "equality" victories of the 1960s and '70s.
Consider these typical words from his October 25 rally in Las Vegas:
You can choose to turn the clock back 50 years for women and immigrants and gays. Or in this election you can stand up for the principle that America includes everybody. We're all created equal -- black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, abled, disabled -- no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from or who you love, in America you can make it if you try.
This, to restate, is his message down the stretch: before the revolutionary uprisings of the 1960s, America only "included" white men. Romney is a white man who wants to return to that time. So if you are a woman, an immigrant, gay, black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or disabled, then you should not merely oppose Romney as a candidate who does not represent your interests; rather, you should fear him, as a man who wishes to eliminate you from the American portrait.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Pravda said that economic and social unrest would shortly result in a civil war in the USA. They said the interment camps were already set up masquerading as camps for natural disasters.
What I see as more realistic?
Hurricane Sandy disrupts the Northeast to such an extent that voting can’t take place in many areas. Either voting is suspended “for the duration” or we go ahead with it, Mitt wins but because of the storms the election is challenged. Either way Obama hangs on!
Works for me.. I’m pretty well set.
I agree with that BUT the people on the other end of the blackberry that put him in the WH like Soros, The Brotherhood, other villainous characters that hate America are probably not going to take his losing very graciously. I’m sure they are putting all kinds of pressure on him. What good is he to them if he looses. In fact, if I were him I would be a tad bit nervous considering what he must know. They might not think he did enough these past four years to make it worth their while to maintain him for his silence. Of course this is all just speculation on my part.
Astute observation.
Fact is, the people behind Obama -- the Chicago Commie Network and their financial enablers, Soros , the Salafists, et al -- have invested a great deal of time, money and effort to get where they are. And they were oh-so-close to their respective objectives.
One would think they won't go quietly. I'd be on the alert for signs of massive vote fraud -- particularly involving SCYTL. And I'd also be inclined to double Zero's Secret Service detail...
I know I am much more racist since this jackel quota boy took office.
Look at her old pictures. She's a slob...and she says he's a slob...
She doesn't cook or clean or watch the kids. And you know he does nothing.
Bet they raffle off the dog when they don't have "paid help" to pick up his poop.
He gets the same pension whether one or two terms. These people do not like to work. They're moochers who care about no one.
COULD he try to start something? Yes. Would he succeed? I doubt it.
Remember, this is a man who cannot fill his nomination venue at the DNC, forcing them to move it to a smaller venue. Obama cannot attract the crowds of 2008 at his campaign stops. The fainting is gone.
Yeah, there may be a few “hot spots” during the election, but I believe Obama is gonna lose badly. So badly that unsupported attempts to disrupt the voting will be quickly subdued by police or angry voters. I think the Black Panthers are in for a rude surprise if they show up at the polls.
If you want to worry about something, worry about Obama STEALING the election! Corruption is his background & expertize. That is his plan for reelection. And if he succeeds, he will be the last President of this failed republic.
Think of the damage he will do between 11/6 and 01/19
Any pRes _ _ent who would transfer arms to al Qaeda
(20000 MANPADS) and watch with pleasure the anal rape
of US Ambassador, while doing NOTHING even while the site was
“painted”, and who has already ordered a billion hollow point
bullets to kill Americans (while arming incoming
terrorists in FAST&FURIOUS) WILL STOP AT NOTHING.
Obama and the DO”J” have probably already made
plans for extermination camps.
After he takes his 10-15 point landslide loss, he'll be packing his bermuda shorts and packs of Marlboro cigarettes and waiting to get out to Hawaii.
More realistically I do see riots in some urban areas if Obama looses especially if the election results are close
It is late on the game. He’s going to milk this storm for all it’s worth.
_____________________________________
He can try but Sandy is lose/lose for FEMA and the feds. If it is only half as bas as predicted there will be millions without power for most of the next week. They will remember it at the polls.
And, this will not be a Katrina event, one that is centralized and geographically focused. It will create havoc across ten states at least. There will be no way for obamski to create a "I'm here to save you" photo-op.
“Too late for him to do anything.”
If he doesn’t win outright, he WILL start a race war, declare martial law until holder crowns him king on some trumped up voter election fraud charges. He won’t see himself give up the throne.
I’ve seen the tweets by blacks saying they’re going to riot if Romney wins, in protest of welfare cuts. Obama doesn’t have to instigate anything (though he probably would), because the slaves on the plantation will riot if they think they are losing their handouts.
“Pravda said that economic and social unrest would shortly result in a civil war in the USA.”
Pravda changed it’s editorial slant in early 2000. It’s now the Russian version of Weekly World News. I loved the story about bears rolling boulders down hillsides and onto passing vehicles. The story ended with a Russian strike force heading into the mountains to attack the bear base of operations.
I think it’s far more likely to happen after he loses than before the election.
“Fed up” folks will be even more fed up if there is “civil unrest” from 0bama’s core demographic, and will tend to make the election a worse blowout than it would have been.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.