Was communist mentor intimate with Obama's mother?

WND.com ^ | June 14, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi,

[Perseverando]

Filmmaker reveals new evidence Frank Marshall Davis was president's real father

NEW YORK – Did Barack Obama’s mother pose nude for communist poet and journalist Frank Marshall Davis?

Did Obama build his political career on a fairy tale that his father was a Kenyan who grew up herding goats?

Was Obama’s goal in writing his autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” to misdirect Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background and a Marxist political foundation?

These are questions filmmaker Joel Gilbert poses in the full-length documentary “Dreams from My Real Father,” which argues Frank Marshall Davis is the president’s biological father, not the Kenyan Barack Obama.

Gilbert reports he has recently discovered racy photos in vintage fetish and bondage magazines of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, that he believes were taken by Davis. The photos, he says, bolster his belief that Dunham had an intimate relationship with Davis.

Joel Gilbert’s “Dreams from My Real Father” is on sale now at WND’s Superstore

Gilbert has given WND a preview of a new “Breaking News” page on his documentary’s website titled “The Intimate Ann Dunham-Frank Marshall Davis Relationship.” On the page, he presents a video that shows some of the 30-plus pin-up photographs he believes Davis took of Obama’s young mother and other models in his home at 2994 Kalihi Street in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Frank Marshall Davis, pornographer

In 1968, Greenleaf Classics in San Diego published a pornographic novel titled “Sex Rebel Black: Memoirs of a Gash Gourmet,” authored by “Bob Greene,” a pen name Davis later admitted was his own.

In the sex novel that Davis claimed was autobiographical, he describes a swinging lifestyle in which he and his wife had sex numerous times with an underage girl named “Anne,” a figure very suggestive of Obama’s mother.

As Gilbert documents, ....

[Fred Nerks]

I need to clarify something...when I wrote that I selected images of zero at random, I meant that I chose as many black and white images as I could find, that showed him of an age as close as possible to Stanley Armour Dunham.

[ETL]

“The second time I went out to California to attend Mohammad Hassan Chandoo’s graduation from Occidental College, Obama was enjoying the lavish lifestyle being financed by his friend and roommate at the time - Hassan Chandoo. The wealthy patron provided Obama access to big houses, lavish parties & had him dressed in the slickest clothes. I could have sworn they were both Gay & wealthy.”

Those were some of the initial observations by Dr. John C. Drew, PhD, on his second encounter with Barack Obama who was attending Occidental College at the time. ..."

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5257893-dr-john-c-drew-and-barack-obama-the-chance-encounter-at-occidental-college

[little jeremiah]

[ETL]

I’m like you, I really don’t give a hoot who his father was, and please don’t think my comments are always directed entirely or solely at you, what I am trying to make clear is, if there are going to be comparisons, they should be made with a large number of images chosen at random.

Understood, and absolutely agree that a comparison shouldn't be made based on one photo. That's what some people here tried to do with Obama and Malcom X. Then again, there are some folks who look like entirely different people in different photographs. Some people look very different from different angles and/or lighting conditions. Others not so different. It depends on the type of face one has.

[edge919]

I suggest you take a good look through your own album, and if you look exactly the same in photographs taken in different lighting and at different ages, that will truly be a miracle.

Who said anything about looking "exactly the same"??

And you’ll be none the wiser who he is, when and where he was born, and what his real name is.

And how is that any different from now, trying to claim that two different women are one and the same??

[Plummz]

Have you bothered to read the article yet, or are your rude, nasty pointless spam comments still coming from a point of unadulterated 100% pure ignorance?

[MHGinTN]

Hmmm, LJ has been involved with these natality issues since before 2008 explosion, and done solid research on the issues ... you’ve been trying to push one excuse after another to cover for the liar-in-chief ... nope, can’t ignore your obvious bias and insults when cornered. Be gone, obamanoid. Peddle FMD on some other forum where real research is not done and you can lead people around by their emotion with your pondscum.

[melancholy]

With comments like yours, you’re hereby renamed CLUMMZ.

[PhilDragoo]

Hmmm, LJ has been involved with these natality issues since before 2008 explosion, and done solid research on the issues ... you’ve been trying to push one excuse after another to cover for the liar-in-chief ... nope, can’t ignore your obvious bias and insults when cornered. Be gone, obamanoid. Peddle FMD on some other forum where real research is not done and you can lead people around by their emotion with your pondscum.

Dittos.

Regarding Davis, again, mentor, not father.

And Obama's sexuality is a fair arc from Davis' knee to Reggie Loverboy, with the beard, the low-down lounge, and Larry Sinclair in between.

Did I mention how much I lu-uv his whistling esses.

Hey, not that there's anything wrong with that.

[Fred Nerks]

...And how is that any different from now, trying to claim that two different women are one and the same??

I am doing nothing of the kind, I am simply showing that the model is always the same model, she had a long career, she got a little older, she changed her make-up, used a little more and darker lipstick, gained some weight, but she was the same girl, and I don't need to focus on what her name might have been, to know there was ONE MODEL, and that model wasn't Stanley Ann Dunham.

[Toespi]

The eyes are without question, identical.

[Fred Nerks]

Who was it RE-ARRANGED Stanley Ann's face? Who changed the nose, the position of her eyes, the distance between her top lip and bottom of her nose...the eyebrows, the hair; there can only be one reason why anyone would want to believe this is the same girl in both images, and that's to confer natural-bborn citizenship upon zero, and try to show that he must have been born in Hawaii.

It's got to be a last-ditch attempt - and for that, a seventeen year old girl who was in high school somewhere in 1960 (we don't really know where yet) has to be labelled a slut and placed in bed with Frank Marshall Davis, although we have seen no physical evidence of her in Hawaii until 1963.

There are many more images of the ONE AND ONLY MODEL in this Gilbert video, SHE NEVER DID LOOK ANYTHING LIKE STANLEY ANN DUNHAM:

SEE VIDEO

[edge919]

Sorry, but this is extremely weak to use photos from two different sides of a person’s face to try to make it look like it’s not the same person. And beside, these images have a similar open-mouthed expression and overbite. These isn’t helping whatever your argument is.

[Fred Nerks]

THE IMAGES BELOW ARE OF STANLEY ANN DUNHAM.

THE IMAGES BELOW ARE THE MODEL

You will find more images of THE MODEL in the video on this site:

SEE VIDEO

[trisham]

I’m not going to the video, but it appears to me that there are two different women pictured in the lower “model” grouping. Neither appears to be Stanley Ann Dunham. Imho.

[Fred Nerks]

I don’t have an argument, I have a pair of eyes, I knew from when I first traced the images of the model to the free-vintage-porn.com website years ago - that the girl pictured, to whom I refer as ‘the model’, was nothing like Stanley Ann Dunham. And it’s rather telling isn’t it, that the entire website has been scrubbed of images since the Gilbert film was produced.
Believe what you like, I can’t force you to see what you don’t want to see. The model isn’t Stanley Ann Dunham and you need to ask yourself, who does it serve to have you believe it does?
And why the promotion of the falacy just now, when those images have been all over the web for YEARS?
Is their house of lies starting to fall down, and ANY ‘father’ will do, as long as it’s someone who was in Hawaii?
Remember, I’m an Aussie, I’m neither a Dem nor a Rep, I’m not a voter, I’m just an observer and I hate seeing your country hoodwinked.

[Fred Nerks]

...Neither appears to be Stanley Ann Dunham. Imho.

And that's the whole point. She's a model who had a long career and her image is all over the video, from which there's nothing to fear, it just shows a series of photographs of THE MODEL - images that Gilbert uses in his film to try and convince his audience that THE MODEL is someone whom SHE IS NOT. The video appears on THE BIRTHER REPORT website:

BIRTHER REPORT LINK

[Fred Nerks]

...but this is extremely weak to use photos from two different sides of a person’s face to try to make it look like it’s not the same person...

you've got to be suffering from conditioning like Pavlov's dogs, to write that, what I posted are two profiles, the only profile shots I could find of 1. STANLEY ANN DUNHAM. 2. THE MODEL.

Get it? Profile images of two different women, whose NOSES are in a diferent place for starters...not to mention all the other obvious differences.

I'm glad you're not identifying people in a police line-up, you would have one of them convicted for nothing more than a superficial resemblance.

[little jeremiah]

You are transparent, a fool, and a liar. And sounding pretty desperate.

You had an absence from FR of over a year very recently, and jumped in with two feet with no explanation of you absence (not that it’s mandatory, but most freepers mention something about long absences) and yet again, as you were before, drumming the nonsensical and evidence-free lie that FMD was Zero’s father and that SAD was a porn star.

You’re either stark raving mad or duplicitous and are pushing this junk for specifica purposes. The most obvious reason would be to push Zero as a NBC.

[edge919]

I don’t have an argument, I have a pair of eyes, I knew from when I first traced the images of the model to the free-vintage-porn.com website years ago - that the girl pictured, to whom I refer as ‘the model’, was nothing like Stanley Ann Dunham.

Nonsense. You're blinded by your own sense of self-importance on trying to establish yourself as some sort of ace debunker. It's not serving you well in the least.