no comment
Of course....Every one of the former candidates should work to defeat Obama.
Ugh.
Of course he would. Though he’s more conservative than Romney, he’s still a Party man.
No comment, will comment when and IF Sarah does the same.
So Gingrich is a RINO now, is that right? Am I being accurate?
Newt, no! Keep on the campaign trail and you might outpace that used car salesman.
Lessee, that makes Newt a DC Insider Sellout just like . . . uh . . . um . . . . all the others denounced here day in and day out????
ML/NJ
The maggot showed it with the millions he spent on attack ads.
“Romney and I have discussed this,” he said.
Romney is a KNOWN Liar - satan is his master. Pulling a lever for mitt is pulling it for satan - it AIN'T happening I don't care who supports the pro homo, baby killing candidate!
Do what you want, NEWT, the POS Mitt will NEVER get my vote and the Republican party is already united like never before with a bunch of no value whores who will sell their soul for a 'party'.
I have MY OWN PARTY, my conscientious and my 'NEVER compromise' with evil standards.
Gingrich is doing the suck.
Newt can say and support anyone he wants. I’m not voting for a liberal socialist to replace another one.
The problem with this story and headline, portrayed as front page news, is that it misleads.
Because it shouldn’t be front page news...and I’m not talking about posting guidelines.
Newt has been saying this for weeks.
And giving his reasoning, which is the nation will be destroyed under a second Obama term.
It isn’t new, it isn’t news.
How many people seem to know that, though?
So they think it is new and that it means he’s really for Romney, after all.
No, he never was and he isn’t now.
It’s his reasoning America is going down, otherwise.
So this is his answer. Hold your nose and vote AGAINST Obama.
Others have different views.
Fine.
I knew when I saw this it would be reacted to in ignorance.
I hate ignorance.
Read my tagline.
Conservative voters are without a “small government conservative” candidate for POTUS, YET AGAIN! Profoundly, frustrating!
Good for him. I won't.
No surprise here.
I was fed up with the GOP in New York State because the candidates switched parties so often I never knew who was actually a Republican.
I changed my party affiliation 2 years ago to Conservative only to discover that every candidate supported by the Conservative Party was a Democrat.
I hate living is this soviet state.
He - along with all the other GOP candidates - has always said that he would support whoever was the nominee in cluding Romney, who is the only competition to Gingrich now. He also said he didn’t think it was a done deal, even though he knew he was the underdog, but he was going to keep on trying (essentially, to prevent Romney from being the nominee).
Why do these routine and selectively edited remarks get posted time and again as if they were something new and horrifying?
This is no brainer. Of course Newt will support the republican nominee.
Not supporting the republican nominee in a two party race gives support to the other candidate. This will be a horribly negative campaign, I can see the ads now....look at all of the conservatives actively working against Romney.........they think that Obama must be okay, they don’t want him defeated.
Sorry, it’s just how it is. The primary is not over, if you will only vote for a certain candidate or candidates, then I would work my tail off FOR that person instead of being totally negative.
Newt can do what he wants, but I refuse to choose party over principle.
Voting for Romney is going into tacit agreement with moving the Republican party to the left. We conservatives are in for a long hard trek in the wilderness, should that man become president.