The terrible truth told by Obama's open mic slip

Fox News ^ | 3/27/12 | Christian Whiton

[Ron C.]

President Obama just gave the world a glimpse into his future foreign policy plans this week, should he win a second term. On tap for Obama II: more faith in our adversaries, more betrayal of our traditional allies and more unilateral indulgence in nuclear abolition fantasies.

Monday, President Obama told Russian President Medvedev that “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.” Medvedev responded that he would dutifully report that tidbit to Vladimir Putin back in the Kremlin. The men apparently did not realize their discussion was being caught by a live microphone.

Given that the two were talking about missile defense, the implication was clear enough. In order to please Russia, President Obama will use a second term to weaken further the peaceful, purely defensive systems that can defend the U.S. and our allies from missile attacks.

[hinckley buzzard]

who is going to put him on trial?

There's a campaign on. Four republican candidates should be roasting this treasonous ratbastard at every oppportunity.

[GGMac]

Regarding the video of the sneaky exchange between Obama and Medvedev:

Closely observe Obama’s facial expressions and his body language.

Jawdropping. “Done. Without a recorded phone call, I’ve succeeded in getting a secret message to Putin.”

[Hoosier-Daddy]

If he does set us up, does he not realize he will not only be a marked man, who will have to look over his shoulder the remainder of his days, but that history shows that traitors are not ever treated well by those who have benefited by such a betrayal?

[Jeff Head]

He’s trying to spin it and it is laughable. He truly believes we the people are lesser beings with no ability top reason and come to our own conclusions.

This man is planning to give away the whole house, including the kitchen sink. He clearly was signlaing the Russians that after his re-election, he will have a free hand and be muvh more “flexable” in his missile defense and nuclear arms negotiations. And Medved understood exactly what he was saying.

Putin has been running the show all along and everyone knows it, now he’s President again and his former KGB self will work and use and play Obama like a fiddle.

He’ll wring every drop out of him like an old rag, and then throw him aside once he has weakened us enough.

[john mirse]

Does President Obama have any idea what a terrible thing he has done by making his "flexibility" comment to the Russian leader?

Basically, Obama told the Russian leader this: You scratch my back now, and if I win the U.S. 2012 presidential election, I will, in turn, scratch your back after I start my second term.

The worst, unthinkable thing that Obama is doing is this: President Obama is allowing a foreign power, Russia, to deeply influence the results of the United States 2012 presidential election.

Here is what Obama's "flexibility" statement is telling Russia:

1. If Russia does NOTHING between now, March 2012, and the United States elections in Nov.2012, then such Russian silence will help Obama win re-election, according to President Obama.

2. On the other hand, if Russia starts making trouble during the same period, Obama could lose the 2012 election.

3. If he loses the 2012 election, Obama is telling the Russians, there is no way that he will be able to help Russia, because Russia will have to deal with a new President in 2013 who may not be as friendly to Russia as Obama is.

4. But if he wins with Russia's help, Obama is telling the Russians, he will be "flexible" in their political negotiations.

5. In summary, President Obama is doing the unthinkable: He is allowing Russia, a foreign power, to influence our 2012 presidential election, something that should shock and outrage all Americans.

6. To President Obama: My God, what have you done? Do you realize what a terrible thing you have done with your "you scratch my back and I'll scratch your back" secret agreement with the Russian leader?

[ETL]

From the campaign trail, February 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[not win it -etl]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert [they are NOT on "hair-trigger alert" now -etl], and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:
http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
_____________________________________________________

"I will not weaponize space"

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems"
_____________________________________________________

2008 Pentagon Report (March 2008):
China's Growing Military Space Power
By Leonard David
Special Correspondent, SPACE.com
March 6, 2008

GOLDEN, Colorado — A just-released Pentagon report spotlights a growing U.S. military concern that China is developing a multi- dimensional program to limit or prevent the use of space-based assets by its potential adversaries during times of crisis or conflict.

Furthermore, last year's successful test by China of a direct-ascent, anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon to destroy its own defunct weather satellite, the report adds, underscores that country's expansion from the land, air, and sea dimensions of the traditional battlefield into the space and cyber-space domains.

Although China's commercial space program has utility for non- military research, that capability demonstrates space launch and control know-how that have direct military application. Even the Chang'e 1 — the Chinese lunar probe now circling the Moon — is flagged in the report as showcasing China's ability "to conduct complicated space maneuvers — a capability which has broad implications for military counterspace operations."

To read the entire publication [29.67MB/pdf], see U.S. Dept of Defense:
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/China_Military_Report_08.pdf

[ETL]

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow
Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 — linchpin of our missile defense — might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...

[ETL]

The Putin-ChiCom-Chavez-Iran-Obama "New World Order"

“We are creating a new world, a balanced world. A new world order, a multipolar world,” Chavez told reporters during a visit to Communist China, one of many. His “new world order” includes [RUSSIA], China, Iran,... and a significantly weakened United States, he explained.

Resurgent Communism in Latin America
by Alex Newman, March 16, 2010:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/south-america-mainmenu-37/3122-resurgent-communism-in-latin-america?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page=
______________________________________________________________

From the Russian News and Information Agency:
July 27, 2006
"'I am determined to expand relations with Russia,' Chavez, known as an outspoken critic of what he calls the United States' unilateralism, told the Russian leader, adding that his determination stemmed from their shared vision of the global order.":
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20060727/51913498.html
______________________________________________________________

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
______________________________________________________________

"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed092605a.cfm
______________________________________________________________

Russia's Medvedev hails "comrade" Obama

Associated Foreign Press (AFP) ^ | April 2, 2009 | Anna Smolchenko

"Russia's Dmitry Medvedev hailed Barack Obama as "my new comrade" Thursday after their first face-to-face talks"

http://www.france24.com/en/20090402-russias-medvedev-hails-comrade-obama

April 1, 2009:
"Obama, Medvedev pledge new era of relations":
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090401/wl_afp/usrussiadiplomacynuclear_20090401152002
______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

President Obama and Venezuela dictator Hugo
Chavez at the 2009 Summit of the Americas in Trinidad.
Note the "soul bro" handshake. (my caption)

Obama, Chavez shake hands at Americas Summit:
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2009/04/17/2698451-obama-chavez-shake-hands-at-americas-summit
______________________________________________________________

From CBS-News, July 29, 2006:

Chavez Vows To 'Stand By Iran'
After Oil Talks In Tehran, Venezuelan Leader Called 'Brother' By Ahmedinejad

"Chavez pledged that his country would 'stay by Iran at any time and under any condition,' state television reported. Ahmadinejad said he saw in Chavez a kindred spirit." "'We do not have any limitation in cooperation,' Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying. 'Iran and Venezuela are next to each other and supporters of each other. Chavez is a source of a progressive and revolutionary current in South America and his stance in restricting imperialism is tangible.'":
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/29/world/main1847331.shtml
______________________________________________________________

http://article.wn.com/view/2009/06/16/Iran_president_visits_Russia_despite_protests/ Delete ReplyReply ForwardSpamMovePrint Actions NextPrevious

[KTM rider]

Obama is the worlds leftist demolition technician a suicide bomber out for the destruction of america so that it can be restructured into Socialist Utopia , highly trained by Ayers and Alinsky

as Obama leaves, the Russians have a vodka toast to Obama the ultimate "Useful Idiot" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot

[RitchieAprile]

what a word picture to bring to mind..

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

“If there’s really 40% out there who approve of this treasonous pig-with-blue-lipstick....then is there really a country remaining to betray?”

A thoughtful question.

[Eleutheria5]

Not as defined by the constitution, but why quibble? Just don’t reelect him, and then he’ll be really flexible.

[RaceBannon]

The new Executive order that Obama signed had always been previously renewed through acts of COngress, NOT executive orders! http://www.sourcewatch.org/​index.php?title=Defense_Product​ion_Act_of_1950 Obama's signing of the executive orders authorizing Government control over all resources is NOT THE SAME as the Defense Bills of 1950: READ WHY http://docstalk.blogspot.com/​2012/03/​hitler-mussolini-stalin-mao-oba​ma.html All other versions of this order were signed and updated through CONGRESS.

[C210N]

I went into your link thinking its intention was to disprove that the recent EO was anything to worry about. I was dismayed to see the opposite - your link (the second one) details at length step-by-step logical details of what’s going on, and it ain’t pretty....

thanks for sharing that (much to my grief!)

[aces]

yep, obamma mamba jamma lenin khomeini is our enemy, it is obvious we have lost a great many freedoms,as we cannot reign in a fake and vile POS POTUS..do we have a country left?

Broke, headed for the cliff and the speed throttle is on full speed..

God help us, in Christ name to be as you call us to be..

[ballplayer]

Interesting with Obamacare before the Supreme court,This issue with the Chances that ONE Guy in Black Robes can Accomplish Obamas Stated Goal of totally Transforming the United States of America.
Obama Stated in a Radio Interview in Chicago that “the Constitution was a Document of Negative Liberties,It says what the Government cant do to you, What the States cant do to you,but it does Not say what the Government can and Must do for you”. Now I always thought that was exactly the Point of the Constitution,to protect us FROM laws like Obamacare,instead of what is Happening right in front of our eyes,the Use of the Constitution,and 9 People in Black robes, to enslave us all to the Whim of Marxist Politicians.
Kennedy stated it when he commented that this Law FUNDEMENTALLY transforms the relationship between the Individual to the Government,well DUH,no s... Sherlock! Then why the Hell dont you just kick all these Jackasses out of the Court room and tell them to all go to Hell!

[Vaquero]

listen to Limbaugh...he will give it to you straigter than any other so called ‘news’ source.

[littleharbour]

Comrade Obama. Someone needs to repost the image of Obama wearing the Che beret. Marxist scum.

[caver]

That link no longer exists?