[Hunton Peck]

Pr0jection alert.

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[Charles Martel]

No, Van... we just hate stinkin’ Commies like you.

[lowbridge]

I’m not a bigot. I hate everybody equally.

[berdie]

I’m not a huge fan of Beck, but he did a great job of exposing this guy.

[A_Former_Democrat]

Still on the racial plantation, bowing before Master Soros, et al.

[Libloather]

"Van Jones is a friend of mine..."

[Gay State Conservative]

I wonder if Van has figured out how Bush,Cheney and Rumsfeld pulled off 9/11 yet? A smart guy like him should have done so by now....10 years after the fact.

[Wisconsinlady]

Wow, if this isn’t the perfect example of the pot calling the kettle “black.”

[cripplecreek]

There are two American dreams. One of them I call the ‘American fantasy.’ You know that one? Everyone is going to be rich. Everybody. And we're all going to be able to ride out to the great white suburbs, get a McMansion, get flat-screened TV to cover up the holes in our lives. That is the American fantasy, which is turning out to be the American nightmare.

That's not my American dream. My American dream is about the freedom to make my own way in life and be left alone. I have no interest in great wealth and have no issue with those who do.

In the eyes of Van Jones and his comrades, I'm the worst kind of poor because I don't seethe with anger at those who have more. Any anger I feel is directed toward scum like Jones who make themselves rich by stirring anger at other wealthy people.

[RoosterRedux]

Van Jones is down with Alinsky.

Demonize your opponent...

'Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It.'

Saul Alinsky

[combat_boots]

My favorite is the ‘white suburb’ remark, made in Hawaii of all places.

I ask you. Where else are the wealthy so out of the way in this country? You have to fly in. A few times, in some cases.

And, he’s married to a White woman, had a nice, cushy back account at Shore Bank, and has led, as in for pay, several ‘foundations.’ C’mon, Man. You work for the CAP. You are part of the 1%.

[jocon307]

Well, we hate you Van, so that’s one. Oh yeah, and I hate Ayers and his harridan wife Dorhn, so that’s 3 altogether.

I’m on my way.....

[savagesusie]

Marxism is all about identity politics-—to label everyone and make them hate all other groups. What a miserable system—it always is filled with hate and loathing, but most of all FEAR. (Solzhenitsyn; Whittaker Chambers).

How can anyone fall for such an evil, ugly way of life-—they have to destroy Christian Ethics-—those ideas about trusting and loving everyone which makes all relationships so worthwhile and fun.

Life is always hard and brutish and short-—Marxism makes it intolerable, since it removes humanity from man. Christianity creates Romance, Chivalry, love and joy. Why are our JUDGES dumping Christian Ethics from our Constitution where our standards and Natural Rights come from that Judeo/Christian God.! They have NO RIGHT IN THE USA TO REMOVE GOD. Wake up, liberals—you are so stupid to try and create a godless world.

[WashingtonSource]

Van Jones hates everyone in America. Like a good Commie, he projects his own hatred on everyone else.

[dfwgator]

We just hate liberals, like you, Van.

[IrishPennant]

I will self moderate my response and remove my comments

[Yosemitest]

First, I'll add this.

Fascist Projection
June 4, 2009 4:30 pm by R.D. Walker

Here is a comment made about me today on another forum.
RD is getting geared up for the his speech during the July 4th parade on Main St. Ohio. He’ uses the winter months to get that snap in the salute. De Karki suite well starched along with the Red, White & Black armband. This year he might grow some facial hair

That was in response to a comment I made regarding inaccuracies in Obama’s Egypt speech. I get tagged a fascist a lot around the web.

Reading through Mussolini’s definition of fascism this morning got me thinking about what fascism isn’t. To understand what it isn’t, you have to know what it is.

Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity.

It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts

The rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual. And if liberty is to he the attribute of living men and not of abstract dummies invented by individualistic liberalism, then Fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State. The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism, is totalitarian, and the Fascist State – a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values – interprets, develops, and potentates the whole life of a people.

If this is fascism, the Real Revo is about as far from fascism on the political scale as is possible. We stand for individualism. We are fiercely independent, largely self-reliant, skeptical of government power, fearful of the passions of the public at large, and modest in our national ambitions. We believe the government that governs the least, governs the best. We understand the State to be a necessary evil. In other words we are the polar opposite of fascists.

It is amusing how often, however, we are called fascists by the very people who embrace Obama’s vision for larger government, the unification of society, social democracy over federalism, of corporatist economics and basically every attribute of 20th century European fascism. The irony is rich: The favorite insult of fascists to tag anti-fascists with is the slur of referring to us as fascists.

Below, Mischelle Obama gives the infamous speech that would have made Mussolini proud.

MIchelle Obama Speaks at UCLA Rally Part 1 of 4 9 minutes 20 seconds

MIchelle Obama Speaks at UCLA Rally Part 2 of 4 9 minutes 20 seconds

MIchelle Obama Speaks at UCLA Rally Part 3 of 4 8 minutes 28 seconds

MIchelle Obama Speaks at UCLA Rally Part 4 of 4 5 minutes 12 seconds

Listen to Michelle Obama: We have to fix our souls at YouTube.com (It's well worth your time)
or read Michelle Obama - We have to fix our souls - our souls are broken [AUDIO & TRANSCRIPT]

Then I'll add this.
I don't mind being call "RIGHT".
That the left knows we are "RIGHT" just tickles the hell out of me, since that leave the left "WRONG"!

David Limbaugh nailed it when he wrote:

"... Communism, as conceived by Marx, was based on the perceived class struggle.
Marx envisioned that the "workers of the world" would unite against so-called capitalist oppression.
Marxism was thoroughly materialistic and rooted in class warfare.
Nazism was probably not so virulently anti-capitalist -- at least in terms of its ideological emphasis.
It was more racially and nationally driven.

So where does that leave us?
Well, today's liberals see themselves as champions of the "working man" and enemies of corporate interests and the wealthy.
Their political lifeblood is class warfare on behalf of the "working man" (read: labor unions).
Redistributionism is at the heart of their philosophy.

When those on the left today call conservatives "fascists" or liken Bush to Hitler,
they are betraying their contempt for what they perceive to be excessive nationalism, patriotism and militarism on the part of conservatives.
But there's a darker side to their thinking.
The left's worst-kept secret is that many liberals believe -- or would at least like the electorate to believe -- that conservatives are racist.
So there you have it.
Conservatives are nationalistic, jingoistic and racist.
Point, set, match. They're fascists.

But it's as divorced from reality as it is sinister.
Conservatives are driven by liberty and a healthy skepticism for centralized government.
They aren't enemies of the federal government
but believe it ought to be limited in its powers and scope, as contemplated and designed by the Constitution.
They are the opposite of racists, aspiring to colorblindness and equality of opportunity and rights for everyone.
We will proudly accept, however, the charge that we are nationalistic, patriotic and firm believers in American exceptionalism.

Liberals can definitely identify with communism, as indeed they have through the years,
as in their glorification of the Soviet Union in years past
and their romanticizing of communist dictators, such as Cuba's Fidel Castro.
But they also have far more in common with fascism than conservatives do,
given their penchant for centralized governmental power and too much state control over business and industry,
as we've seen most strikingly under President Barack Obama.

As political theory and actual practice throughout history demonstrate,
both communism and fascism are left-wing political and economic ideologies --
as far as they can be from the right wing of the spectrum."

But I would add the following.
We've got to discuss the liberal's problem of psychological projection.

Liberals do this all the time.
Here's a definition.

Freudian Projection

The following is a collection of definitions of projection from orthodox psychology texts.
In this system the distinct mechanism of projecting own unconscious or undesirable characteristics onto an opponent is called Freudian Projection.

• "A defense mechanism in which the individual attributes to other people impulses and traits that he himself has but cannot accept.
  It is especially likely to occur when the person lacks insight into his own impulses and traits."
  
  
• "The externalisation of internal unconscious wishes, desires or emotions on to other people.
  So, for example, someone who feels subconsciously that they have a powerful latent homosexual drive may not acknowledge this consciously, but it may show in their readiness to suspect others of being homosexual."
  
  
• "Attributing one's own undesirable traits to other people or agencies, e.g., an aggressive man accuses other people of being hostile."
  
  
• "The individual perceives in others the motive he denies having himself.
  Thus the cheat is sure that everyone else is dishonest.
  The would-be adulterer accuses his wife of infidelity."
  
  
• "People attribute their own undesirable traits onto others.
  An individual who unconsciously recognises his or her aggressive tendencies may then see other people acting in an excessively aggressive way."
  
  
• "Projection is the opposite defence mechanism to identification.
  We project our own unpleasant feelings onto someone else and blame them for having thoughts that we really have."

And here's a problem with honest people.

(General) Projection

Here projection is assuming that others act or perceive similarly – according to this definition it is not necessary for a projected trait to be undesirable or unconscious.
Projection is probably inherent in social animals and the single most important psychological mechanism.
The following are given as examples:

1. Individual A assumes that B sees the colour red as he does, until informed that B is colour-blind;
   
   
2. Someone who never lies is easy to deceive because he projects his truthfulness onto others, assuming that others are honest also;
   
   
3. ‘It takes one to know one’;
   
   
4. An inept con-man fears that others are trying to cheat him, signals his fear and alerts others;
   
   
5. (Freudian) An individual who possesses malicious characteristics, but who is unwilling to perceive himself as a protagonist, convinces himself that his opponent feels and would act the same way.

Liberals constantly project their own vile values onto conservatives, intentionally or unintentionally,
and they need to called on it, shamed on it, and laughed at to scorn, when they do it.

We MUST get rid of these evil people.

[ETL]

Obama's former "Green Jobs Czar", Van Jones, links "Green Movement" to revolutionary communist movement!

See "Goal is complete revolution" below...

VAN JONES (Obama's former 'Green Jobs Czar')

YouTube:
"Valerie Jarrett, Senior Advisor to President Obama, speaks [lovingly] about Green Job Czar, Van Jones, at the Netroots Convention on August 12, 2009. Then Van Jones speaks about [a COMMUNIST] transforming [of] the whole society."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnDxzvc0OXk&feature=related
_________________________________________________

"Jones was the leader and founder of a radical group, the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. That group, together with Jones' Elle Baker Center for Human Rights, led a vigil Sept. 12, 2001, at Snow Park in Oakland, Calif.

STORM's official manifesto, titled, "Reclaiming Revolution," surfaced on the Internet."--via TheObamaFile
http://www.leftspot.com/blog/files/docs/STORMSummation.pdf
_________________________________________________

VAN JONES SHOCK ADMISSION [in his own words]: "Goal is Complete Revolution"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh4Z0V0zNQg
_________________________________________________

Here is the transcript of the above YouTube video:

“Right after Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat if the civil rights leaders had jumped out and said OK now we want reparations for Slavery, we want redistribution of all the wealth, and we want to legalize mixed marriages. If we’d come out with a maximum program the very next day, they’d been laughed at. Instead they came out with a very minimum. “We just want to integrate these busses…”

But, inside that minimum demand was a very radical kernel that eventually meant that from 1964 to 1968 complete revolution was on the table for this country.

And, I think that this green movement has to pursue those same steps and stages.

Right now we say we want to move from suicidal gray capitalism to something eco-capitalism where at least we’re not fast-tracking the destruction of the whole planet. Will that be enough? No, it won’t be enough. We want to go beyond the systems of exploitation and oppression all together. But, that’s a process and I think that’s what’s great about the movement that is beginning to emerge is that the CRISIS is so severe in terms of joblessness, violence and now ecological threats that people are willing to be both pragmatic and visionary.

So the green economy will start off as a small subset and we are going to push it and push it and push it until it becomes the engine for transforming the whole society.

SOURCE for this transcript (it matches the video):
http://ironicsurrealism.blogivists.com/2009/09/02/van-jones-obamas-green-czar-%E2%80%98green-jobs%E2%80%99-goal-is-%E2%80%98complete-revolution%E2%80%99-away-from-%E2%80%98gray-capitalism%E2%80%99/
_________________________________________________

Here's the original source for the Van Jones quote about the time he spent in jail following the Rodney King/LA riots (Jones was arrested in "peaceful" protests in San Fran). It was in a 2005 interview he did with East Bay Express. They of course (what else?) claim he "renounced his rowdy Black Nationalist ways" since then (yet he's calling for "complete revolution" in Aug 2009! ...see above):

But in jail, he said, "I met all these young radical people of color -- I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, 'This is what I need to be a part of.'" Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. "I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary." In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. "I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th," he said. "By August, I was a communist."

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/gyrobase/the-new-face-of-environmentalism/Content?oid=1079539&showFullText=true
_________________________________________________

The 1992 LA/Rodney King riots were instigated by the Revolutionary Communist Party...

From David Horowitz's FrontpageMag.com /DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

"Throughout its history, one of RCP's [Revolutionary Communist Party] principal objectives has been to foment civil unrest in the United States. The most notable example of such efforts occurred on April 29, 1992, when RCP members looted and trashed the downtown and government districts of Los Angeles, triggering the infamous Rodney King riots. During the days immediately preceding the violence, RCP -- which maintained close ties to the L.A. gangs known as the Crips and the Bloods -- had circulated throughout South Central Los Angeles a leaflet featuring a statement by RCP National Spokesman Carl Dix, titled 'It's Right To Rebel' -- a quote popularized by Mao Zedong.

Encouraged by Dix, RCP activists helped lead the riots that would leave 58 people dead, more than 2,300 people injured, some 5,300 buildings burned, and $1 billion in property damaged or destroyed. On the ten-year anniversary of the rioting, RCP member Joseph Veale fondly recalled the violence as 'the most beautiful, the most heroic civil action in the history of the United States.'"
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6197

[ETL]

"Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal".--James (Jim) Cone,
African American Religious Thought: An Anthology (Paperback)
by Cornel West (Editor), Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (Editor)
__________________________________

SEAN HANNITY: But Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not backing down and has not for years and in his strong stance on the teaching of black liberation theology is nothing new. He had the same things to say last spring when he appeared on "Hannity & Colmes:"

WRIGHT: If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the '60s, systematized black liberation theology that started with Jim Cone in 1968 and the writings of Cone and the writings of Dwight Hopkins and the writings of womynist theologians and Asian theologians and Hispanic theologians, then you can't talk about the black value system.

HANNITY: But I'm a — reverend

WRIGHT: Do you know liberation theology, sir?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354158,00.html