Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Says He Would Enforce US Obscenity Laws That Obama Ignores
MSNBC ^ | March 16, 2012 | Andrew Rafferty and Alex Moe

Posted on 03/16/2012 10:56:03 PM PDT by Steelfish

Santorum Says He Would Enforce US Obscenity Laws That Obama Ignores By NBC's Andrew Rafferty

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL -- Rick Santorum accused President Barack Obama of not enforcing the country's obscenity laws and said Friday that as chief executive he would crack down on illegal pornography.

Santorum found himself answering pornography questions during a stop at an Italian restaurant here after the discovery of a statement posted in his campaign website in which he asserts that "America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography." Recent reporting has shed light on the letter in which the former Pennsylvania senator vowed to "vigorously enforce" all the country's obscenity laws, though he said the statement was posted three weeks ago.

"We actually respond to questions that we get into our campaign when they say 'What are you going to do about these issues?' And when we respond we post them up on our website. And the response is, ‘we'll enforce the law,’" said Santorum.

"I don’t know what the hubbub about that is," he said. "We have a president who is not enforcing the law, and we will."

The candidate best known for espousing family values argues on his website that pornography causes changes in the brain to both children and adults, and contributes to violence against women, prostitution and sex trafficking. "The Obama administration has turned a blind eye to those who wish to preserve our culture from the scourge of pornography," he wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at firstread.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; 2012electionbias; antiprotestantrick; culturewar; familyvalues; freespeech; how2lose2obama; kenyanbornmuzzie; lostby18forsenate; mittromney; nannystate; nationalissuesricky; newtbotsforromney; newtgingrich; obamassillytwin; obscenity; obscenitylaws; peripheralissues; pornification; pornography; proillegalssrick; prounionsrick; rick4anticondomczar; rick4antipornczar; rick4pope; rick4proillegalsczar; rick4prounionczar; ricksantorum; ricksdebateoncondoms; ricksearch4ridicule; saintsantorum; santorum2012; santorum4censorship; santorum4obama; santorum4romney; search4dumbproblems; senatorsactimonious; tinybrain; tinyideas; tinyiq; tinysolutions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-500 next last
Porn kings contribute to liberal causes and liberal politicians turn a blind eye to criminal obscenity.
1 posted on 03/16/2012 10:56:09 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

>>Porn kings contribute to liberal causes and liberal politicians turn a blind eye to criminal obscenity.<<

Frankly, in the scheme of things on a scale from 1 (least important) to 10 (metaphysical importance), porn rates a .0005


2 posted on 03/16/2012 11:04:39 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Spoiler Alert! The secret to Terra Nova: THEY ARE ALL DEAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Pornography is an issue to be concerned about. However, it does NOT belong in a presidential campaign.

It’s an issue that many people, not just men, but some women, have struggles with. But, does it rise to the level of a presidential campaign issue? No.


3 posted on 03/16/2012 11:21:45 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Major issue of the day!


4 posted on 03/16/2012 11:23:38 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Does it rise to the level of government involvement?


5 posted on 03/16/2012 11:24:45 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Santorum would be a disaster as the nominee. (as would the other two)


6 posted on 03/16/2012 11:30:15 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Agree with you 100 per cent.


7 posted on 03/16/2012 11:31:06 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“illegal” pornography probably refers to kiddie porn.

Libertarians think its just art.

sickos


8 posted on 03/16/2012 11:37:58 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
What will the next major policy statement be; resurrecting the Temperance Union and Sunday Blue Laws??? This is a Commonwealh’s/State's Attorney General type issue not an agenda for the highest office in the U.S. ...what is Rick thinking???!!!
9 posted on 03/16/2012 11:38:54 PM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

Molesting kids on camera is not something for government to stop?


10 posted on 03/16/2012 11:40:01 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTM5oGv8hvM


11 posted on 03/16/2012 11:40:10 PM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Always amazing how many Freepers have no problem with kiddie porn


12 posted on 03/16/2012 11:42:44 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think kiddie porn is already a federal crime that is heavily policed..as it should be.


13 posted on 03/16/2012 11:44:40 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
That is Santorum’s problem, he thinks Government has the answer for everything. What's next, will he suggest burning books, more government intrusion into the private lives of FREE Americans. I certainly agree the pornography is a problem, however, so is an intruding government that thinks they can legislate absolutely everything. Just let him keep talking and he will begin to sound like Obama.

Oh I forgot about all those intrusive bills he has already authored, and some he just thinks he can author to “save” all us sinners.

By the way, maybe he and Karen should consider all the time they are spending away from their precious daughter. I don't mean that in a harsh way, so lay off you next ugly post. I just think if Bella is truly living on borrowed time, God would want him not to waste one minute away from her, especially on a political run. Time is so precious, it gets away from all of us. Rick and Karen are spending a great deal of time away from that sweet baby, and I just keep asking myself if it is worth it.

Politics is not worth wasting the time they could be spending with that precious child. GOD bless Bella and her family. I have her in my prayers daily. I also think Bella is just about the sweetest name I have ever heard. I wish I would of thought of that name when I had my daughter.

14 posted on 03/16/2012 11:48:50 PM PDT by Bobbisox (All American Conservative Mama Grizzly (MR. NEWT - 2012)(MS. SARAH - 2020))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

What the hell are you talking about?


15 posted on 03/16/2012 11:49:04 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Frankly, in the scheme of things on a scale from 1 (least important) to 10 (metaphysical importance), porn rates a .0005

I think many Democrats would disagree with you. They think it is very important to have an issue like this to use against Republicans. "The Religious Right wants the government to search your computer for porn!" will make a great get-out-the-vote message.

16 posted on 03/16/2012 11:54:25 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

You need to get your mind out of the gutter.


17 posted on 03/16/2012 11:57:52 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bobbisox

Sadly, politics is religion to politicians.


18 posted on 03/17/2012 12:00:10 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
It must be Newt!

If Santorum is the candidate, the election will be about his SERP.

2012 has got to be about Obama! the economy, STUPID! and not about morals!

I read the First literally!

19 posted on 03/17/2012 12:08:54 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; Raider Sam
> Always amazing how many Freepers have no problem with kiddie porn

To GeronL: Name them, please.

List the FReepers, by screen name, who have said, "I have no problem with kiddie porn". And who are not obvious DU trolls.

Not just FReepers whose beliefs you differ with, and therefore you wish to slur with such horrific accusations. Just list the ones who state they "have no problem with kiddie porn". FReepers are not shy. If such a person exists on FR, they will say so.

Surely you are aware that child pornography is already wildly illegal. And that therefore such a FReeper, if they exist, is advocating doing something wildly illegal on a conservative forum? If such a person exists on FR, they should be run out on a rail forthwith. Flush 'em out and I'm sure the Admin Mods will be all too happy to ban them.

So yes, please list these "many FReepers", whose numbers are so large they "amaze" you.

20 posted on 03/17/2012 12:12:46 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-500 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson