[Dilbert San Diego]

Pornography is an issue to be concerned about. However, it does NOT belong in a presidential campaign.

It’s an issue that many people, not just men, but some women, have struggles with. But, does it rise to the level of a presidential campaign issue? No.

[Raider Sam]

Does it rise to the level of government involvement?

[Antoninus]

Pornography is an issue to be concerned about. However, it does NOT belong in a presidential campaign.

Well then you can blame the media for bringing it up. Santorum's position statement on the issue is nothing earth-shattering.

[Tribune7]

However, it does NOT belong in a presidential campaign.

But enforcement of law does.

I don't think Santorum is pushing for new obscenity laws.

And how exactly would Romney or Obama answer "will you enforce obscenity laws?"

[altura]

Does Santorum allow himself to be trapped into these side issues or does he bring them up?

Either way, it’s not smart.

It jut reinforces fears among some people that he would be a theocratic president.

[fwdude]

Pornography is just a small portion of the possible violations of public obscenity, and the whole ball of wax is, I believe, what Santorum was addressing. The "wardrobe malfunctions" during nationally-viewed football games, not to mention the finger and corresponding obscenity by another "artist," absolutely gutter and offensive "art" which is subsidized by you and me through a government bureaucracy, protesters allowed to express all manner of lewd and universally illegal acts of public obscenity with impunity. These all need to be addressed immediately by a conservative president.

[The_Freemason]

This kind of nonsense is why Santorum will get shellacked by Obama.