Forced Abortion ping....
Ah, ‘tis always enlightening to watch liberals defend one of their many versions of the “luminiferous aether”.
“’the statements of a person suffering from schizophrenia surely cannot simply be taken at face value.’”
“I am the Law” comes to mind.
To me the even bigger question:
What “Doctor” performed such a procedure?
If the judge decided that the woman was also too good looking for her mental condition, would the “Doctor” also have agreed to ugly her up a bit?
Besides having judges that don’t deserve to judge anybody, we have doctors that don’t deserve to be doctoring anybody!
I believe this scenario is how things got started in nazi germany...first the mentally ill, then the physically deformed, then everyone that did not agree with them...then the camps...
“...would choose to terminate her pregnancy if she were mentally competent, chiefly so that she could resume antipsychotic medication that would have harmed the fetus....”
So...murdering the “fetus” to prevent it from being “harmed” is ok....
I get it...
Only in the warped, sick, delusional insanity of a liberal brain could this even remotely make sense.
Christina Harms, who retired from the bench last month after 23 years, said she concluded that the woman, a 31-year-old who suffered from delusions, would choose to terminate her pregnancy if she were mentally competent, chiefly so that she could resume antipsychotic medication that would have harmed the fetus.
So the mentally ill woman went off of her meds so as not to harm the baby and the judge gleens that she doesn’t want it? It seems to me that she REALLY wants it. If she can’t proprly take care of the baby (after resuming medication) they can put it up for adoption. It looks like the judge she is looking for reasons to abort.
One of our BIL has a schizophrenic sister who has had 3 kids that were all adopted and raised by one of the other sisters.I can’t imagine a judge ever saying that any of those 3 kids didn’t deserve to live.The youngest is serving in S.Korea as a US soldier......
““We need to protect judges from the popularity of the moment.’’ “
‘How about we need to protect unborn children from the popularity of the moment of murdering children? This “judge” meeds lessons in morality not whining about herself as a victim.
Simply Nazism
In the particular circumstances of the case I do agree with the Judge.
Darwinian Eugenics in action.
Ahhh Massachusetts... the land of many laws... nuff said.
Forget China, US has its own government forced abortions
This was done in the past to ‘mental defectives’, etc. who had no choice in the matter...outrageous that this woman feels she can order the killing of a children because of *her* emotions about the situation, which seem to be anti-Catholic AND anti-Constitutional! So glad the appeals court caught it!
Now when is this woman losing her job as a law-creating ‘judge’??
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
So the judge is rendering her decision based on her uncanny ability to read what is inside another's mind.
I'm glad I'm not standing before her as a defendant.
I fear I'd be sentenced to life in prison if she could read my mind...
And so it continues...first make it legal for a mother to murder her own baby....then make it not only legal but advisable.....then make it easy to obtain.....then make it a government given right......then let judges order it done.The insanity continues!!!
I can’t help but think that her last name is appropriate and indicative...